BuzyBat

Read 'internal testing', it doesn't mean we get it, maybe next week or even later if something more is broken. So enjoy your weekend, without beta5:pilotfly:

How many days do we have to wait to get this fixed, already got a ticket, but no response.............yet. (got response, I'm me + number one now it seems, not a word about fixing it)

I used to have that problem with trackir4 not trackir5. Never crossed my mind there was a Alt F1 view, if it works online I probably should get this too, and 3 screens wide.:smilewink:

I don't see the big point in this, or is it possible to remove the 3d cockpit on main screen? Using Trackir5 , I can click in 3d cockpit without problems.

I have that problem too, maybe because i use windows7 Norwegian edition. It's not possible to change the ',' to a '.' without manually edit, or using 'replace all' in in Notepad++. And program changes it back if I reopen it and use save button.

Just for the fun, it's not impossible, but 3'rd try. :thumbup: But I would rather see stationary, pop up camo net, after a few min. Because like it is now, it seems not fair to have uncovered and very visible, even IR profile looking same as easier targets. Would be better for buisness to have SAM units without camo net, and easy targeting for newcomers, and harder with camo net, for us who like a challenge. Just my opinion. Maverick vs 4 Strela 1 Tor 1 TAR.trk

If you put a T 72 at the end of the Strela's, you see what this make it look like, Mavericks really like T72's. And I'll put up a BMP-1 too, didn't know it was like Strela's. Maveric vs 4 Strela 1 T72.trk Maveric vs 4 Strela 1 BMP-1.trk

Back on track again; I made this track in LockOn FC2 to show what it's about. You will see 5 Strela 10 (SAM13), with about 1m spacing, not covered with sandbags or camo net, like in real life to hide them, quite visible. Track only show first Maveric launch, finally lock at about 2.8 miles. Maveric vs Strela.trk

Thanks, it went up 60 points, now only -201.

Har beta her og, og venter på Warthog også, fra Brussel http://www.simw.com/aboutus/

OK, thanks, I didn't know that, will give me a hard time to give him back all those rep's then :) ( This works both ways, or just negative?)

Nobody answers?

You still avoid to answer, so my insult seem to be correct, because you still acting like one :) I just wanted to know if you only gave me -1 point, thats all, and I would forget it.:helpsmilie: Edit; I guess I have to make it more understandable, I only see one posting me reputation, could be that it only show there if there is a comment, I don't know for sure. So the fact that my reputation decreased to -261, and I have doubt that 261 persons did that in just a few hours that morning. I just want to know if I can rule you out, so I can know sombody else did that, understand?

159th_Viper, on my cp I only see one giving me Reputation, did you alone manage to give me all those??????

My email today; :music_whistling:

Then don't zoom. Try 6 x magnification next time as opposed to the 3 x magnification.....;) I don't get this, first you say one thing, next you say different? To me it's very clear there is 2 bugs here, first the slew bug. The second bug is if I got this right ,the SAM vehicles are too bright on display, and thats why we all think it should not be that hard to lock. Because if SAM's are harder to lock, then it should be reflected in IR display too. All in all, this problem and the slew problem making it extra hard to target something, is beyond my understanding, you actually deliberatly want to ruin a possible good game? (at least the maveric use) And to the no patch in future decision. Doesn't this qualify it to abandonware? Edit; Hey, it's FC2 I'm talking about, not DCS series, so stop the negative reputation! :) (lol, down 265 in last 12 hours)

Ok, I know it's lot more complicated than WoP, we almost got a patch every other day on that beta release. Just that I would like a patch sooner :)

Time will tell, I'm probably gone pessimistic, because I don't even expect a patch the next two weeks. (Then simply please remove that line in Pre-Purchase :) ) Maybe you can tell me how many patches you and the rest of Ed testers have recieved, because if it's less than once a week I could understand your beeing so defensive. A simple Torrent with a patch that already made for Ed testers, would do fine, no need to put lot of extra work to document it.

I think every improvement would help, after all it's already broken (Beta remember?), or else why even mention it in the Pre-Purchase post? Maybe it's just me, but since I way back have been waiting for a 1.13 patch, and later the 2.0 came, that we had to pay extras for,without even patching to fix Navigation, it's already dead to me. So ,if next patch will only be a final one, it will be just another broken promise from developers, and I wonder if they care at all but the money...

It would be wort it if we could get a patch, after all there was mentioned about a autoupdater. ( And no stupid remarks from Ed tester team, you already have updates frequently :joystick::pilotfly: ) Pre-Purchase "DCS: A-10C Warthog"

The 'Khashuri Gap' mission has a JTAC, but I'm not sure it's for A-10 or the F/A-18's

I can see a good reason for ED to skip FC2, and that probably next plane would be DCS:Su-25T. Most of work already done in FC2, and no much change in the advanced FM needed.

Using G940, I have to move ailerons to it's limits, to avoid left roll at takeoff, seems joystick axis input arent initialized until it's moved.

Arm switch On?

ppl that don't like HL have no clue about the 'ignore/unignore' menu?