Jump to content

naturestrike

Members
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by naturestrike

  1. Gryphon 1 | Phantom MiG-21bis
  2. Gryphon 1 | Phantom Mig-21 reserve.
  3. Yup, this update definitely messed something up in VR it is practically unplayable now.
  4. I have the same issue. Has ED been notified of this?
  5. no bombs loading on pylons
  6. Also, is there a newer thread/discussion on this? https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php...72&postcount=1 This one is around 2 years old, and I'm guessing much more is known abou lt to it now.
  7. You're right. Regardless of what was the "right" or "wrong" choice I guess it's good that people were compensated. This luthier person though..I hope he gets what's coming for him. NEVER to be trusted or worked with again. Gratz on the spitfire btw everyone :D
  8. Wow never realized how much of a mess this was.. they duped 2500 people! $150,000!!! I think ED should not have gotten involved. This was between the backers and creators, right? The backers should take full responsibility for their decision to fund this project, even if it fails like it did. And like so many other kickstartes that turned out to not be legitimate. Why was this to be any different? I hope you can undersatnd how horribly shady this all looks now. LOL seriously EVERYONE watch this video... he better be out of a job or "flipping burgers" like he said. What an absolute joke. Just watch the second video, it perfectly sums this all up. There's nothing more that can be added after that
  9. Also I wanted to mention, this but it's kinda unrelated. But what is the actual story about the ww2 map? I heard it was started on gofundme by people and it failed, then ED took over (even though it wasn't their responsibility to deal with it). Just wanna know the actual story out of curiosity.
  10. Agreed, just wish i knew their thought process. Their communication isn't the greatest in the world as stated before.
  11. Oh don't get me wrong Yurgon. I think DCS is AMAZING one of a kind and they have done tremendous stuff like you just stated. The things i said just are merely to accelerate the what I believe to a be a the baseline infrastructure for all these great things. I would LOVE to have ww2, trainers, etc you name it, but after the things i stated. :p I just believe base DCS is "incomplete" without some stuff like dynamic campaign and more modern fighters. Afterwards though, should be expanded for sure.
  12. None of what i said implies I don't care what people want, I messaged the guy talking about ww2 birds hoping he enjoys them to the max when they're out. I'm talking about priorities here bud.
  13. haha the f-35 was a joke. My actual point is just to scramble after the latest fighters/bombers/transport with enough information available to the public to make an honest study sim of it.
  14. Awesome! It's great to see these comments and see where people agree and disagree.
  15. "developing aircraft for DCS takes time, many third parties who were new to DCS created trainers, each trainer has its own role to fill, it also gave the devs the opportunity to learn DCS from the inside. You do not have to own them, so I do not see the problem, same for the WW2 stuff." Not sure how you do that quote thing :p But I 100% agree with you, and I made sure to do that myself. Vote with my wallet. I encourage all customers to do so even if it's hard and boring to wait for only a new "legitimate" release. <3 which for me are Razbam Harrier, Leatherneck Viggen and F-14, and lastly if real the VEAO eurofighter
  16. First thank you a bunch for your reply. The point I'm trying to make is probably ED working on WW2 etc IS one of the huge reasons for all of the mentioned above. Prices, time, content, and not working on the real complex important projects like dynamic campaign for example. But just my two cents :D i'd love to hear other thoughts on this.
  17. I know this is a shot in the dark and will make 0 difference but I want to get it off my chest anyways. DCS could have been 10 times the sim it is, if it was planned right from the beginning. There is no reason to have 4 trainer aircrafts with such an incomplete sim. Even in real life the point of trainer aircrafts is the price/experience to run a real one. BUT this is a sim! I'd rather have my F-14 right away and crash it a million times as i learn. It makes no sense to have F-15, SU-27 modelled at FC3 levels, and have WW2 aircraft fully clickable. It doesn't even make sense to have WW2 in DCS yet. PERIOD. you really need to establish the infrastructure and modern aircrafts first, YOU are the only ones in the modern fighter jet business. IL-2 is available if people need their WW2 fix, but DCS is the one and only for modern fighters. If anything WW2 aircrafts are all about the dogfights, ballistics etc so it makes sense to have it like IL-2 level inside the cockpit. Fighters on the other hand need a fully clickable cockpit because of the complexity required in dealing with the systems. Also your company has reached a size where it's almost inexcusable the amount of delays(due to stuff mentioned above most likely, and causing community jokes "TWO WEEKS"), the prices, the communication/transparency with customers about how far products are, and lastly the prices. In any product, as you go through many iterations and learning processes the level of complexity/quality increases or the time/price decreases. It saddens me that the A10C was released 5.5 years ago, and it trumps almost everything that has come out since. We expect the quality to go up ( and if that is impossible to do DCS world limitations that is understandable), but at least the price, and time between products should be drastically decreased as you learn the ropes with every new aircraft. So for my wish, i hope you get to work on what i view as the important stuff for a modern combat simulator. Like a dynamic campaign (available in falcon for ages, I'm positive one can be made that is order of magnitudes better than theirs), Modern aircrafts(f16s rafale, f-35 :P or WHATEVER you guys can get your hands on for the public), and finally new MODERN conflict maps to match the aircrafts. Thank you for reading this and I'd love to hear what I'm missing out on or not seeing correctly. Also, I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this.
×
×
  • Create New...