Dementia

ну тогда дайте 120С для синих ) потому что это только проблемы красных ))))))):pilotfly:

i have an question.... i use 2 monitors on LEFT i use it AS MFD and on right i play the game.. on M2000 i got an problem i cant see Radar on my Left screen but when i go to External view... my Radar pops on left screen and when im back into internal radars goes to black screen. how can i fix this?

what about F-15E?

ok now let me fix my point of view withsome links. http://www.explainthatstuff.com/radar.html High spatial resolution radars and optical cameras are two major kinds of sensors for civilian earth observation, and military applications. Their images are quite different from each other and radar images are usually much more difficult to understand [1–3]. This paper will discuss about this issue and show the reasons. We know that the human eye’s vision system is similar to a camera, or in another words, the human eye is indeed a camera. The basic imaging principle of optical camera is “small-hole” imaging, it gets the two dimensional resolutions about the target through angular discrimination, but for SAR/ISARs, they get the range resolution by discriminating the arrived time from target, which is proportional to the signal bandwidth, and thus is inversely proportional to the time duration of compressed pulse signal, while get the azimuthal resolution through aperture synthesis, which is inversely proportional to the coherent integration time. So radar images have unavoidable and severe geometric distortion compared with optical images, e.g., layover and foreshorten, which makes the radar images more difficult to read. For ordinary optical camera, the signal (light) comes from the sun or other artificial sources, it is wideband, continuous, random and incoherent. When imaging, the signal interacts with the target, where reflections and scattering occur. Due to the short wavelength, which is in the order of several hundreds of nanometers, the scattering exhibits diffusion characteristics and is localized for almost all natural or man-made targets, i.e., the scattered signals from every part (structure) of the target go through the lens and is sensed by different part of CCD matrix to form a pixel. The pixel is formed by incoherently summing the single scattering and multi-scattering signals from the same part of the target, so there is only additive noise, at the same time the scattering center (referred to as the pixel) is very stable and independent on the direction of incident light if the looking direction is fixed. But for SAR/ISAR, the transmitted signals and the scattered signals are both coherent, and the image is reconstructed by coherent processing the echoes, where the pixel position is not stable but dependent on the direction of incident wave, i.e., one may get different radar images for the same target even the looking direction is fixed but the incidences are different. The role of multiple scattering effect is very useful for camera in some degree for increasing the randomness of incident light, so make the image looks more uniform and smooth, but for radar, it is very harmful because it leads to the scattering centers deviated from their geometric position or induces ghost scattering centers. The noise in SAR/ISAR images is composition of additive and multiplicative noises, so it is very hard to remove. For camera, the signals come from the surface scattering of the target, but for radars, the signals come from both the surface scattering and the volume scattering for general nonmetal target, and the volume scattering makes the scattering centers more complicated. As for the signal point of view, for camera, the light waves are continuous, non-coherent and are of one octave. But for SAR/ISAR, the signals are usually pulsed and coherent. So integration 1412 PIERS Proceedings, Guangzhou, China, August 25–28, 2014 time for optical image can be much longer than that of radar image, i.e., the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of optical image could be much higher than that of radar image. Optical images and SAR images are presented and compared to illustrate the similarity and the difference between them

please do basic reaserch good example like T.A Said is israeli Iron Dome ) that can track and shoot down 155mm shells i have Mention A10C TGP becouse it has Radar ( TGP POD that use Visual kind of Detection) and it has an MFD that display and ur Brain that can has use like central command and i doublt bird would reach 1m or even 550km/h or we have some supersonic birds? the funny part is that ground force naval and air + central intelligence are evolved in new way of combided command to share data ) somethin like datalink betwen jets like A10C that share stuff or ka-50 but this is an game and you dont have all of those stuff ) not even lil bit so your ground commander is some holy ghost that can jump into any tank,car,truck or troop and use it as he will..... so he can warn pilots about incomin 27T/ET or just press F10 and see woot hes controlled units can see )

in air Combat Even 1Sec can result in outcome is it lose or victory u should know that as u playin flight sim

how can u judge and say it wont be useful in real life? lets say u have small outpost with high ranked officer that u need to protect and in some random god will u have those Radars setup that protect u from missles / rockets or even 155m shells and can shoot em down in flight and avoid 90%+ dmg to that area is it still not useful in real life? i mean guys.... please....

you can ban me after u show me some proof ;) until then its just "i gues" or " might OF Been Him" dosnt really work

Becouse :D it would break hes logic LOL the funny part is that he knows how A10C TGP works he knows how radar works :D but he says those statement like i justt dunno who Monkey with Granade if u will

did u really just said that?....... i mean....really? did u just really said those stuff.... i mean expalin why radar cant detect , track and preditct inpact zone? you can do better then KH-58 and mavs on f10

Please Explain me Dear internet user why u so sure that Radar cannot see missles? of that size?

330 is it?> :)

do 50more km/h when hes limit is 250 yes in real life he might do ) depandin on hes age service time and many other factors but doin 330 on decend of 1000feet ) and flyin 5k feet i start to wounder

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B0-50 ka 50 wiki https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B8-8 mi 8 wiki :D correct me if i am wrong mr sofa warrior ex militia mi 8 pilot with any other jet or craft how would mi 8 blade hold that mass that pass its limit by over 60km/h? also DCS dosnt have material strength and other things that could possibly save heli from death

no i call cheater those who does not fit those parametars :D! or its USA prapogand to make USSAR look weak? https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B8-8