slundal

Thank you :) Maybe I'll try over at general. I noticed that I have the same issue with the KA-50.

I doubt this qualify as a bug so I'm posting here initially. I've recently upgraded my rig with two additional monitors giving me almost 180 degree field of view. Great! Right? :) So here is the problem. I run the sim basically by stretching out the resolution. Over all three monitors. In this case I have it set up as follows: Left 27" (1920*1080) Centre 34" Ultrawide (2560*1080) Right 27" (1920*1080). The total resolution is set to 6400*1080. In the Harrier for example this looks fine. But in the Viggen it is so zoomed in, even at max zoom out that it becomes unplayable. Which is really a shame. I've added two pictures to show what I'm talking about. Is there anyone out there who can help me set this up better? I can also add that I've tried to change the min max field of view in the view.lua in mod/aircraft/AJS37/config This only results in the Viggen module not showing up in DCS at all. Which is too bad since I suspect that this is the setting that limits the zoom out. As a final not I'm running this in Open Beta but I do not believe that it would be any different in stable.

Anyone no longer able to use RB75 (maverick) after latest open beta release? Can't get the EP sight to show any video. When I switch to ATK the EP sight doesn't show any video. I've done the RB75 to death so I'm pretty sure I haven't just missed something in the setup for it. :smartass: Tried in my own cold start mission as well as in instant action when I spawn in the air.

The AIM54 will get preiodical updates from the AWG9 throughout is flight until it can make an lock with its own scanner. It is not strange that it would drastically change its course to respond to a sudden maneuver from a target. And even if it looses AHR track it will fall back on updates from the AWG9. As long as you still have the enemy as a radar contact the AIM54 can be redirected. Also I believe that even if you loose radar contact briefly and then quickly require it AWG9 will again send updates to the AIM54 to correct its course.

I've started using the rolling landings with the harrier on the Tarawa and it works just fine. We're discussing using it in our squadron since it requires less fuel and allows for a return with more fuel, ordnance. Alos I actually find it easier especially in bad weather.

So I've discovered that the TPOD seems to give coordinates in decimal form. Is there anyway to (inside the Harrier) convert it to minutes and seconds? Also follow up question. Does the harriers nav computer use decimal or minutes and seconds?

A while back ago I saw several post about how you intend to make both the JA37 and the J35 AI units to be used in DCS. But recently I haven't heard anything about this. The AJS37 is amazing, but without realistic AI units to support it the experience is kinda flat in my opinion. I'm not demanding nor complaining but since these units have been specifically promised by heatblur it would be nice to at least get at status report.

I'm looking for interested Viggen pilots who wants to join my squadron Gustav Röd which flies in the TAW.net DCS branch. We are usually among 20 - 40 pilots on the European side every Sunday flying mission both in PvP and PvE setting covering almost every "modern" airframe available in DCS. check us out:https://tawdcs.org/squadrons/ Recruitment video: E9gSYoMyDsY

Awesome! Thank you renhanxue. This what what wanted to know!! :D Please see if you can dig up those images, would be really interesting to see. :) Also huge thank you for the source! This is going to keep me up for a few nights. ;)

I was under the assumption the one of the main design requirements of "System 37" was a STRIL integration. Source (Swedish) https://www.aef.se/Flygvapnet/Notiser/FPL37_Viggen.htm

I know that both the J35 and JA37 were equipped with datalink (STRIL). The J35 could receive commands directly from ground operator displayed on their instruments for example. And JA37 could even overlay each others radar information, if I'm not mistaken. Was there any datalink systems active in the AJS37? If so do we have any chance on seeing them integrated in the sim?

So I did this video initially just no have some fun. But due to a bug in DCS currently when (as far as I know) you start in a hangar you face the wrong way this might actually help someone! So enjoy! :pilotfly::lol: c9dtl6iKeqA

Since the 2.5 update some of my favorite roads to land on for the Viggen has been "littered" with telephone posts next to them making it insanely difficult to land on without hitting the posts. :joystick: So please share with me your favorite roads to land on in 2.5! Preferably with grid and LOLA. And maybe even a screenshot of your parked Viggen. :D :pilotfly:

omg, I'm just insanely stupid. haha Thanks!!

So this might just be me being stupid but I can't for the life of me figure out how to add the Ticonderoga class in the mission editor. From what I can tell it should be there in the list but isn't. Am I missing something obvious?

Thank you! :) I have all those switches bound to my hotas. If I'm using the right procedure then I'm gonna file this under "bugs" instead.

Come on! No one?

So I'm trying to do a nav fix and or move my target waypoint. My process is as follow. :pilotfly: 1. T1 Fix - grid goes away, cross-hair shows up. (the M or B changes to an E) 2. Move cross-hair over desired area on the radar screen. 3. TV Fix From what I can tell this should be the correct way of doing things. But, every time I do this the grid just comes back. The cross-hair is still visible and the target waypoint does not move or no navigation fix takes place. :joystick: Am I missing something important here?

It seems like a lot of people are picking up the Mirage 2000C now during the autumn sale so I thought this might be useful. Just a "quick" walk through of the Mirage cockpit and a simple startup procedure: WXI-ruILYro

Bullshit I'm sorry, I really love the MiG-21 module. But this crap about the god damn activation issues with your product is absolute bullshit. Why the hell do we have to thru something like this just to get this module working. I have never had any problem with any other module in terms och license and activation except with the MiG-21. Which idiot on your team is responsible for this mess? I'm not gonna touch a product from Magnitude 3 LLC again. I'm very disappointed at how your are creating issues and then excepting you customers to fix it for you. I really wanted to use much more colorful language but out of respect for this community I'm restraining my self.

So I've been trying to recreate what an old school strike mission for the MiG-21Bis would be like. I know that most airforces worked with detailed pre-planning, navigation and absolute radio silence. The MiG-21 is not a CAS fighter so it can't be as flexible as the A-10 nor is it as competent as the AJS-37. Anyway here is my take on it. Please give me suggestions and comments on how I can improve the mission and make it more realistic. The video includes both the planning stage and the execution. QKFv4wcY5ec

I have put time-stamp links in the video description so it is easy to jump back and forth between them. But yeah I know, didn't plan that far ahead when I made the video. Might make a revised one in the future. :)

Did this as much for my self as well as for everyone else who wants to study the different signal coming from the RWR. There is a complete list of aircraft and ground installations tested in the video description so you can jump back and forth and have a listen. Hope you guys find this useful! :) 2MFFyElZFWE

Thanks mattebubben, as always you are a infinite well of information! :D Much appreciated. ;)

First: What is the difference between RB75 and RB75b can't find any reference to this in the manual. I assume the RB75T is for a heavier warhead (T = Tung = heavy). Of course I understand that the "b" version would be a slightly newer missile. But there is literally no info about this. Second: Is there any other ground attack weapon you can equip together with the RB75? Every time I try to equip any other a2g weapon with the RB75 the sight doesn't turn on and I can't launch or lock up anything whit the RB75. Is that a bug or was it intended to be like that?