Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ice_Cougar

  1. Wow that was amazing to watch! Reminded me a little of Yimie Yu’s videos. Great work! [emoji106] Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  2. Will the tomcat be 2.5 only? Or will there be a version compatible with 1.5.8?
  3. I certainly hope not... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  4. I cannot figure out how to fix this: I've performed re-installs, Steam's "verify integrity of game files", (This is for steam DCS so sadly I can't use the updater.exe) deleting the files that are not passing the check then re-verifying, everything that I could have thought of. I bought the M2K on steam because of the sale. (I don't mind having to switch over to the Steam DCS just to fly it, thud I bought it on there) But I can't seem to figure out how to fix this integrity check issue. (please help)
  5. I fixed the issue on Friday. Works great. Thanks again for making this :) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  6. Am going to test right now. Thanks so much for making this! :D
  7. I try to keep myself close enough to shore to be able to see a large landmark like a busy harbor or river opening or peninsula at maximum radar range to get a rough INS update to get near base for TERNAV updates and/or navigation assistance from the ATC. There is also the strategy of keeping some stationary ships at a waypoint for better precision, but that seems somewhat unrealistic for me.
  8. I think that would require the weather data from each individual server, but the pressures never seem to change so maybe having a pressure converter/calculator for the default Caucasus weather would be possible?
  9. Np, and thanks :) Haha learn the databus and computer well, and you'll find its probably the most capable jet it DCS. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. Yeah for the most part you are correct. More clearly it doesn't work if you click it, I don't think it works if you map it to your HOTAS, and I KNOW it works when you map it to a keyboard key. Also congrats. Its an incredible module :) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  11. The manual says that before takeoff, but after data cartridge loading, it is recommended to enter the ID of starting and landing field(s). So for all we know, it could be an intended feature to make us follow the procedures or something...either that or indeed a glitch. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. I think I've already thanked you for this but I feel the need to thank you again lol. For the past months this thing has been a live-saver! Also, is it possible for you to add a binding that lets the airbrakes be toggled? Thanks ;)
  13. @GGTharos Okay I see. Thanks for the info. :)
  14. Wow. RIP flanker fans then...I never knew that. So you've mentioned these things weren't in the . Is it possible for me to view it? I'd love to read it.
  15. Yeah you're correct on all of those (I just gripe about all this stuff because I love the flanker family) :D However if we look in the manual: It does use INS guidance with radio correction, and only uses the radar's CW to perform final stages of guidance. It has been noted on another forum thread and I'd like to see how it would improve BVR performance of the Vympel 27R/ERs
  16. I see. Thanks for the quick response ;)
  17. Hello Mirknir. Is it possible for the flankers to be put into groups of two or four in the aircraft selection screen (making flights consist of 2 or 4 planes instead of each plane being an individual flight) so the datalink systems can be used more effectively? When it is like this a flight leader of 2-4 could much more quickly tell his/her wingman or wingmen to go after a target marked with a number and other info instead of having to give a heading, radar elevation setting, possibly an expected distance setting, and other info, or having to wait for awacs to find something then relay it to others.
  18. IIRC didn't the Su-33 used to have R-77s and the "Sunburn" ASM in early LOMAC? I knew it could carry other things like KH-31As, Ps, and another ASM that I can't remember the name of, however due to a lack of funding never received these...I still don't see why some of these couldn't be in the game though. A simple ASM mode where you just fire the missiles on maybe a wind-corrected bearing/heading and they use active radar to find anything in front of them like the RB-04. And seeing that the R-77 is in service, we should at least get to use it. We could get by with the same HUD screens as launching an R-27, just the enemies' rwr doesn't instantly go off until "pitbull". Heck. The R-27R/ER should be able to fly off the rail, close-in with a radio datalink, and the enemy RWR should be receiving a lock but no launch warning until the seeker is within a certain range, but even that isn't in yet.
  19. Yeah that is the main problem with my idea. Razbam is going to top it with a glass pitted, turbo-propped dank meme of a machine. :lol: I just wished for a good Bronco for it's slightly (imo) greater weapons payload and pretty amazing STOL performance. But you're right...there is now no use for an OV-10 and to be honest the A-10C already did it in. :cry:
  20. This campaign is looking great! I'll definitely be flying it this upcoming weekend :D
  21. An OV-10D, D+/M maybe...as long as it gets a FLIR and RWR, I'd fly that a bit as a counter insurgency and AFAC aircraft. But as for adding yet another trainer, no. We don't need the A-37. OV-10 is still seeing combat even today. Fighting militias in the Philippines.
  22. 1. Are you using keys to control that switch on the canopy? Because it doesn't work with clicks. Only key-presses. I have one button to set the switch to KONT (continuous) and one to put the switch back into the neutral position (ceases all dispensing unless you're using quick release). 2. Are you making sure the streak selector (dial next to the countermeasure mode selector), is set to "0" instead of "4"?
  23. Thank you for posting this. Mavs on the F5E would make it easily my fav jet next to the Viggen.
  24. If anyone has been cooking an F4 I doubt it'll come out this year, as we probably would have heard SOMETHING about it by now.
  • Create New...