sylkhan

After a lot of testing ls6-100 here are the results : - Target select (area mode) - 100 % direct hit - 10/10 targets destroyed - Target locked (point mode) - No direct hit - 7/10 targets destroyed - PP point - No direct hit - 6/10 targets destoyed 1) inacuracy of target locked is due to target not centered after being locked (coordinates are not accurates) Target selected, area mode, (coordinates are good, target is centered) 100 % hit Target locked, point mode, coordinates are not good (need to be the same as "area mode"), target not centered, no direct hit 2) Inacuracy of PP point is because Map coordinates <> JF-17 Coordinates PP point, coordinates are not good (not the same as "area mode"), no diect hit I moved the PP point for JF-17 to have same coordinates as "area mode" and 100% direct hit The conclusion is : guidance is perfect, but 2 things need to be correct 1) Locked target need to be centered 2) Jf-17 coordinates need to be the same as Map coordinates (tested on caucasus map ) The difference between map coordinates and Jf-17 coordinates affect all LS6 and GB6, but LD-10 too(Often slightly off), i mentionned it on Deka discord (my discord name is : Kaenzdhi)

+1

Yes, it is the new system from ED, but they forgot (strangely) to add red ECM, that gives the "blue" military GPS system, lower accuracy or no accuracy at all) For the red side and to get around this, DEKA should do an optional ("what if" FC1 version like ED have done with KA-50) with 2 minor changes 1- "BEIDOU" guidance system (i don't thinks it's modelled in DCS, unfortunately, but we can use glonass with better accuracy ) 2- Metric system There is already a chinese mod cockpit. Problem solved.

I'll try to remember it

Great, Thx @uboats It was quick

+1

Coming from a true flight simulator it's always funny to see these arcadish items from Flanker It's more cheating view and doesn't fit the simulator philosophy

That's the point, a F10 map for a simulator should not be configurable, but just a map (like a paper map, with annotations)

No problem not solved, because other player will look at it. If arcadish game is your cup of tea, why not, but some prefer simulation with more realism, anf this F10 map is a joke.

Caucasus CCD Caucasus IR CCD = IR and Image Quality seems to be degrade too

Yes i know, red side + "unrestricted sat nav" checked in the options has the same GPS accuracy than blue side, but i don't understand why ED has degrade GPS accuracy for red side.

ok, i have done 2 tests on blue side, 4 ls6-250, 4/4 hits 2 times 100% hit. I can confirm accuracy on blue side is Ok, the inaccuracy is on red side due to the stupid new feature (lol) of ED. I would like to understand why a red JF-17 should have a worst GPS guidance, than a blue JF-17.

It's a post from an ED team Guy

@uboats Here is a short video + tracks Does the new "degrade Red GPS" from ED, affect the LD-10 too ? EDIT : I have done some test with LD-10 in blue side and the accuracy is way better, then yes, it affect LD-10 too. Somtimes i do a direct hit or just near the taget, and no damage, that's very strange. 2LD10-PAS-No hit.trk 2LD10-SP-HIT-no effect.trk LD10-PAS-LOFT-no hit.trk LD10-SP-no hit.trk

I thought it was a joke, but it isn't. That's crazy..... I will select "unrestricted sat nav" option in the Mission Editor, and see the difference.

+1, even SEAD can't be done actually with JF-17 I have JF-17 since day 1 (it's my only modern fighter), and i am very disappoint since some months because of inacuracy of weapons. I can't enjoy and play this bird anymore, too bad.

@J20Stronk You should do some more testing because i think something is wrong with guidance, even LD-10 guidance is strange. I have done some test against SA-11 (here is 4 ld-10 launched in SP mode at 15 mn) IMO that should be investigate, but that's just my opinion

I agree, but other Jsow/jdam seems more acurate than ours, it should be the same. I am refering about videos, because i don't have f-18, then i am not sure about my statement. Look at the image 8/8 targets, we can't do the same with our jdam/jsow

It's sometimes more than 3m, and they were more acurate before, something is actually wrong IMO. If you look at the f-18 JDAM/Jsow they are perfectly acurate, look at 3.40 mn, our ls6 & GB-6 are not. It's normal because you use the same bomb on 4 pylons, then only 1 profile. If you have bombs on dual rack or different bomb type (250 & 500) you will need 2 profiles Yes with laser they are ok Your track is too long (18 mn), try to make them shorter EDIT : in the last changelog i can see "Prepare to switch to ED’s LS-6/GB-6 " Perhaps @uboats is waiting for the switch and can tell us some words about this.

Syria & persian gulf EDIT : After re-testing ls-6 100 i have the same acuracy problem than other Ls-6, very strange, if i am the only one with this behavior JF17 entrainement-syrie.miz JF17 entrainement-golfePersique.miz

Perhaps LS6 better like "leaopard" than "APC (my targets)", (just kidding). I use mission editor It's seems to be something wrong with my install then, I will try to de-install the module, do a repair, and re-install the module. EDIT : after a fresh install, no luck, even in TOO mode (pod), ls-6 (250 & 500), GB-6 HE, are not accurate, only Ls6-100 are ok

I tried with 4 target and it works, but i use only 2 profiles Profile 1 ->PP1 & PP2 Profile 2-->PP3 & PP4 I hit only 1 target but each ls6 go to his target (missed them because of inacuracy of LS6 (and GB6 by the way)) Your Sharkplanner is great, didn't know about it, can you add FC3 (su-25) planes, it would be really useful

What version of DCS MT or non MT ? Can you do a track ? It's strange, my LS-6 250 & 500 often miss the target (DCS MT, TOO & PP)

After patch LS-6 100 ok LS-6 250 not ok (TOO & PP) LS-6 500 not ok (TOO & PP) GB-6 ok GB-6 HE not ok (TOO & PP) GB-6 SFW ok