joker62

This report is really impressive and I think it should be digested slowly, at least for me. Thanks for sharing. I look forward to trying these FM refinements with the F-14B as well. This's particularly interesting to me. I bought F-14 at the end of January and I haven't stopped flying it since. But I noticed that the bolter percentage is much higher than with FA-18C. Still, I'm thrilled with this aircraft. Excellent work. I will look forward to these future updates as well.

Currenthill great work as always!!! ... I forgot to thank you for sorting your mods by nationality on your website. Much easier to search and find what you need. Thanks again.

Thank You very much ED, this OB update is really an unexpected and very rich surprise. The download will begin soon, in the meantime I read the changelog and then we'll fly. That's pity for issues related to the SC. Anyway thanks again.

Currenthill, thank you very much, good job! Great idea to have everything available on your site. Just a small request: it is also possible to have the release date next to the version? Thanks.

Thanks to you too The_Tau, really very instructive video. Thanks a lot for sharing.

Thank you very much near_blind, that was just what i needed to know. And you are right, it doesn't depend on the previous mission. I've created other short missions from scratch and this "distortion" due to carrier's own magnetic field and induced magnetic field is always present with F-14 on the deck. I thought I'd made some mistakes and instead this information had escaped me, also because the FA-18c in the sim does not seem to be affected by this problem. Thanks again

First of all congratulations on the wonderful F-14 module. I've always taken advantage of free-trial periods of this module and two weeks ago I decided to buy it. I'm really satisfied!!! And now my problem. I've created a short mission to practice CQ (Marianas map, CVN-71, mission starts with my F-14B ready for takeoff on CAT 1). From time to time I change the weather conditions and consequently also the direction and speed of the carrier. After making these changes, my F-14 keeps the direction of the previous mission in the HUD, BDHI, VDI, HSD and even on the compass. I replaced the F-14 with the FA-18C and the highlighted heading is now correct, according new carrier's direction. I dont understand. Can someone help me? Or maybe it's a bug? I attach some screenshots. Thanks. antonio.

Awesome. Thank you very much.

Awesome. Thank You.

I agree. I've rarely read such a detailed, honest and proactive report. There're moments of waiting that seem endless, but when such a report is sent, one is even more willing to wait for the next update. Thanks a lot, good job.

Very exciting to read about EDDCE, its structure and the progress made. Obviously, I think we all are eager to field-test the flexibility and complexity of this engine. We stay tuned for more news when available. Thank you.

Great newsletter. I immediately bought the upgrade to the fantastic BS3 and can't wait to fly it. I'm happy that the work on FA-18c and SC continues, as well as on the new cooling system (even for Yak-52). Great job in today's OB . THANKS.

and sorry if someone has already reported this. example: I fly FA-18C in the sea of PG. The average air temperature at sea level between the Arab Emirates and Iran (obtained daily online from weather sites) is on average 23-26 degrees, even in the months of December, January and February, rarely dropping to 16-20 degrees . In DCS (weather static conditions) in December the air temperature is stuck at a maximum of 15 degrees. Please can you unlock temperatures in ALL maps? In this way everyone will be able to set the local air temperatures of the area in which he will fly. Thanks in advance.

Yes, I understood that, I'll wait. So each third party will have to work on their own map? In this case it will really be a longer job than expected ...

The screenshots of PG are really wonderful and exciting. Thanks for your hard work. However, I hope they will be soon available also in the other maps.

I agree too.

The degrees on the compass rose (in F10 map) are difficult to read, at least for me, even with eyeglasses. Please, is it possible: - make the degrees numbers sharper or bigger (even better)? - add some more colors besides the current one? - add another (selectable) double sized compass rose? Thank you for this very useful tools and for your attention.

Well, we'll certainly stay tuned for updates. Thanks.

I fully agree! Waiting for how ED will decide on this.

Thank you very much for fixes and updates. Can't wait to try it.

I don't want to make controversy or start sterile debates, but I think similar features in a flight simulator completely out of place. There should be an option for those who want to activate these features and not vice versa, for those who don't want to have them. However, thanks to Bignewy (for autoexec.cfg) to remove these, in my opinion, senseless features.

Thank you very much

Thank for clarification. So, at the moment, no Ramat David or Beirut in the planned airfields. However, I'm confident to see these airfields in the future map extension based on user feedback. Thanks again for your good work.

The high detail area should also include airports of Haifa, Ramat David ect, but these are not included in your list. Will they still be included on your map? Other people have also asked about this, but I havent found any answer. It's possible to know something about it. What Sirrah observed is fully shared by me, even for single missions, not necessarily in a campaign. Thanks in advance.

Thank you very much! Outstanding work!