Inseckt

That was it!!! I feel so stupid. Thanks!! Watching now...:pilotfly:

Really!? Kind of insane, I thought China was beginning to loosen up a bit, with all the fuzz around the olympics and stuff.. To bad. Allthough I'm confedent that is not the problem I experience myself, as I live in Norway. Youtube also suggests I might have javascript disabeled, allthough I don't think that is the case, how can I tell, and in wich case where do I turn it on??? :helpsmilie: Sorry for slightley off topic! Edit: ops, seems I got some help while writing this, thanks I will check my browser settings... EditEdit: I did have javascript enabeled... D*mn... Stupid youtube... Please let me know if it gets uploaded anywhere...

Is the video uploaded somhwere else? Youtube says I need to update my flash player even though I have the latest version, can't quite figure it out... I MUST see!!!

So, if I have understood this correctly, you need to have LO:MAC AND LO:FC 1.2 To be able to patch to LO:FC 2.0? It is not a direct patch from LO:MAC, right? Just to clarify... Great news by the way... Might be the "boost" LO needed to stay alive until DCS have fast jets...

Never happened with me, allthough I rarely fly with more than one wingie... Maybe it was modelled? Nr. 55 might have been going through a rough patch lately, and when he caught his wife in the sack with is best friend (Nr. 53), he snapped and whent on a psycko trip. :pilotfly: Seriously: Awsome Pics, might just be desktop material....

^^^^^ This is fine if you want to keep giving him ingress points, but lets say that you want him to engage a new set of targets directly ahead, can you make him engage without using ingress points all together? I would like to know myself for quriosity purposes.... (I havent been using it myself, so I wouldnt know...)

Have you heard of tachview? You can find it at lockonfiles.com. As I understand, the new version even records shell rounds, so you could use it to proove/disproove the battledamagetheory. Anyway, I have never encountered performance degrading damage, that does not consequently also generate a warning/Instrument readings... And, before letting totally go of the Anti Ice-theory, I must just make sure you know the difference between rotor and engine anti-ice functions... (Huge operational difference)

I have my finger on Cp's suggestion... Could you take off when Engine anti dust/ice were off?

Maybe you can find something in this thread... Don't know if it's exactly what your looking for, but atleast its a start... http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=44499

I would love it... I'd pay for a blackhawk anyday... Escpesically* those turbulent stormy nights... *Spelling???

So thats it then??? case closed? and were only on page 6.... I'm glad to hear you are getting into it... :)

I know all modules were announced to be compatible, but latley there has been some "hints" from members of ED that they are having certain "difficulties" making the modules as compatible as first announced... We know nothing spesific, so I think it is fair to be speculating on this. Or maybe the opposite but for the same reason....

Great idea! Hope you get good answers...

This thread is full of good posts about the philosophy of controlling a helicopter, but any newcomer should anyhow take the time to read the long but intresting threads about trim and operation of the autopilot (with and without FD). I think you'll find them among the stickeys. Here you will find plenty good posts wich will elaborate a bit more to the QA provided by EB... But most importantly: don't get discouraged, we have all been through that horrific learning curve of DCS:BS, it will all suddenly make sense....

I agree with DocNobby. If DCS code becomes so open that it will be possible to make actual addons and not just mods, I would'nt care for it unless it was somehowe officially approved by ED to be DCS standard? I know these aspects was discussed at some point, but I can't remember any conclusion. In SP however... ...I would loooouve an X-wing!....

I don't think it is possible to set them up from the ME, like with vehicles, at least it was not so in FC. But you can edit the length and speed of the train, I think, through a lua file....

I don't really think it's a bug, simply a "shortcut" for the trains to turn when they reach the end of their route.

This patch sounds like it will further glorify this outstanding simulator, I especially like the sound of the new triggeractions.... All praise to thee! Ave ED Amen!

@Alphainfinity: Would reason nr. 2 also normally result in the famous recalibration screen of the schval display? Just a side-question... Don't have the possibility to test it my self for some time...

EDIT: accidently posted a meaningless post....

I think I read a similar thread where it was explained that if you overtourqe the engines or something like that, you lose power for a second, and tthen the INU goes haywire becose a part of the system does not back up on batteries... And the autopilot needs the INU to function... Give the INU thre minutes to reallign or something...

I think he intends to simulate it with triggers...

LOL, we just waited 5-6 years (don't know anymore) for BS...

This was a nice nostalgic conversation! My self, I can't remember what my first computer was named, but it's anyway quite funny to think about how far it has come since then... And I'm quite young....

*commits suicide and deletes the game* Hehe, it might be easier to do it in opposite order:music_whistling::D