Jump to content

gl33k

Members
  • Posts

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Wether physix is hardware or software does'nt matter money wise. nvidia bought rights. everything about it is nvidia own. So frankly , i will wait before trust nvidia will freely share a part of they just bought. in other hand, i agree , in order to spread "standard" physic lib into gaming industry , they must... such physic feature can't be enough precise for model a flight model ?
  2. physX cost money. do you want they bought it , and so release an unpolished game ?
  3. it's just shader writing. yes, it should be there !
  4. flight simulator use a server - client architecture in order to be able to set a multiview display. not sure if it's native , or a feature of a 3rd party plugin.. You can so have a 20 computer network , each one managing 1 different view. computer #2 could have 5fps, where the 19th other have 30fps. you ask me to give you a way to do that in a viable way for BS or FC , i can't. but I KNOW some guy KNOW how do it . SWAT4 on PC use a mini windows head camera for teammate view. this camera doesn't eat more than 10% of framerate. right it's not the same game, neither requirement, but i'm sure their way is more efficient than how ED did that. and GPU wise, i'm pretty sure lockon doesn't push my card in its limit. texture wise , geometry wise, and shader wise ... my cpu is the bottleneck , or should i say the game code ? performance isn't all about harware. software is involve too :smilewink: intel , or few developper conference talk a lot about this rendering technique these time , mainly because multicore cpu are now mainstream. ps: Fighter ops might be modularised. they talked about not throw our old computer ;)
  5. the reason it's so slow is bad technology choice. or knowledge. on other side, some developpers are working on crappy games , but are ace in multithreading optimization. specially console developper ;) the problem is located elsewhere for them :D
  6. and that's exactly what we have yet with flamming cliff. i lost 50% of my framerate with TV on. at 50fps, it 's not so bad. but over a large town , barely 30fps, it crawl to 12 15 , making game unlpayble. ED should look about multithreading stuff. we have quadcore today ...
  7. @LastRiffleround: yes , but don't fool yourself neither other. you know that a new landscape would be great for FC community. and a landscape , isn't the top of the edge of their code... on other side , Everyone were awating for a dynamic campaign. what means conditionnal trigger in editor. all i want is ,i think, what all other want , this time at least ... @britgliderpilot: exactly , good point. i never could get a "randomness" in my own mission. and that pissed me off :/ of course, i didn't read the may 16 report. Indeed , all this BS specs make my hope revive !
  8. hey you , . we didn't make sheep grew up together. so just watch your word. I'm not here for debate with guy like you , simply because you can't. i say, "i prefer thing like this" you answer to me "move , here it's like that" you are useless :megalol:
  9. i would means Plane ... :lol: editing ...
  10. my hope toward lockon were huge. after a while i understood that no plateform opening would appear , so , we stayed with same unique topography, too few addons , particularly playable. One time again , my hope are same :noexpression: , i would like to see a team who share some of their tools (SDK) in order to balance work load :D. i'm dreaming about flying a F/A 18 over afghanistant, with dynamic weather, mission trigger, and diplomatic condition too . no only "fly straight and attack". this action isn't possible with flamming cliff. too bad. In short, will it be some flyable PLANE in near futur ? is it confirmed ? are they actually working on it ?
  11. gl33k

    DCS vs. H.A.W.X

    master of the obvious :music_whistling:
  12. gl33k

    DCS vs. H.A.W.X

    it was never done. but your assumption could be false the day when ED will release an iso of "DCS for Xbox 360" ... Anything is possible. as far as it doesnt eat more than 490MB of ram... right, but yesterday, i already played sim . the day before yesterday , i was too ... right, see #1 i don't understand ? all is about harddrive and device driver. keyboard too , but , theoricaly ,all is possible. it has a cpu , a RAM array , an harddrive, an operationg system. the only thing missing is ... customers . entirely false. no one has ever did it. i means, on mainstream market. on niche sim gaming. but it's not "undoable".
  13. rgr that edit: key received ;-D thanks ED !
  14. Hi. i sent an email this morning to "activation@lockon.ru" , i would like to know what is the delay before received my key.
×
×
  • Create New...