Jump to content

Hammer1-1

Members
  • Posts

    3165
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hammer1-1

  1. who cares if it never saw Normandy? plenty of other theaters across the aisle...
  2. you know, now that you mentioned it, 7.2.2 was released in December 2024 and I didnt even notice that....someones updating it quietly. Heres to hoping 8.0.0 is in the works!
  3. it hasnt been touched in a long while now. its likely not going to be fixed any time soon either since DTC is one of the things being developed next for most of these aircraft.
  4. you installed it incorrectly. IIRC that only happens if you didnt unzip certain files (or they were installed in the wrong directory). Did you install this into your saved games folder or main directory?
  5. yeah but we know better. its not likely this corsair will be available until at least another year. Mag 3 seems to be deader than dino turds found in the riverbed. I cant remember the last time we had an update for ANYTHING they made: Mig21 or the Christen Eagle. Last update showed them detailing the gun bay which looks like it was just started and the flight model had some sort of issue to overcome with real world performance not being readily available. why that is, I dont know, there ARE still flying examples around Dont get your hopes up unless M3 chimes in...which is about 99.99956789% guaranteed they wont.
  6. Is Santa real?
  7. https://discord.gg/zj5HQtKW he's essentially retired from building these for profit, so keep that in mind.
  8. The APU warning is just to let you know the APU is running. There really isnt much of a consequence of leaving the APU running except just generating time on the engine and wasting fuel. It "should" be off because if you leave it on, you run the risk of forgetting about throttle lever settings and you could very well be flying around with your throttles at 80%. Done that a few times myself.... .. ..... ! Its not a bug; every aircraft in DCS that has an APU (that I can remember of) will tell you the APU is running when you throttle up or pull pitch. Its not supposed to be on unless you need it on for power.
  9. regarding the world map: Id like to know if that will be released in a similar context as to what MSFS2024 turned out to be instead of MSFS2020 - stored on local hard drive or streamed.
  10. Yeah I agree 100%...but with that said, personally I think they need to finish a few modules first, and frankly Id seriously like to know how ED thinks they could model the AESA radar to such a high fidelity without just making it "work" like a video game radar like in easy mode. If they can pull it off and fool even the professional F-35 drivers around then have at it...but I got my ass chewed out for posting an ITAR image once, and knowing after Ive worked at Lockheed once upon the time, the entirety of the F-35 is ITAR controlled. Man, I have serious conflicts right now with this info....
  11. I agree. The first time it was announced, it crashed and burned because the community figured theres no way in hell they can make it accurately, and 13 some odd years later my feelings are pretty much the same. That was a huge mess then...still considered to be a huge mess now, and quite frankly it looks like everyones opinions havent changed either.
  12. he aint wrong though...and I thought the BMS community was uptight.
  13. I flew a C172 once a bunch of times
  14. what makes you think the F-35 is a POS? I can very much assure you that it is not.
  15. Id really like to know what block they are intending to build, because the current iteration of the F-35 series is a tech demonstrator for the most part. What about its stealth capabilities? Helmet mounted optical sensors that can see through the airframe? AESA radar? I really do find it weird that they would pick this aircraft after that F-18E/F were turned down solely because of classification of the secret sauce and the AESA. I worked on the F-18 Blk 3 for a while and I never could see the full aircraft without a security clearance or escorts.
  16. Its easy to make the F-35 quite honestly. Aside from modeling the actual aircraft in full, just turn labels on. edit: did someone mention the F-117 being in progress? I have to ask because Ive seen a few comments mentioned in discord saying so, but I have a hard time believing that.
  17. no, he was going to do the F-35.
  18. this isnt the first time the F-35 was flung around here as a module because I remember Kinney Interactive from 10 some odd years ago with a kickstarter program (and that fell flat on its face).
  19. threads been dead for a while anyways. who cares?
  20. and people wonder why I ditched vr.
  21. Bump, new TEDAC arrived today. Still for sale if anyone is interested. Ill also consider reasonable offers.
  22. Ive just been waiting on an AI A-6E tanker for the last 6ish years...
  23. I am seriously interested in starting my own rotor wing group, searching for like minded people who want the same. Me: seriously relaxed on the ground / milsim in the air, but we're all adults in a simulator, so the BS small stuff should go. You: same as above, but experienced as well, but open to discussion about realism and whatever else. Ive been in several groups in the last 6-12 months where nothing seemed to click with me and the group or people inside. Looking for like minded people that want the majority of their time to be milsim in combat, but the rest of it knowing that we're pretty much the only people in existence in our campaigns/missions and 90% of the not-so-fun tedious stuff is gone. If there are people out there that feel the same way, please shoot me a message. Thanks.
  24. 100% working. Im selling because I just ordered a new one from him with a bigger, better, and badder screen setup and Im trading up. 400$ S&H included. Screen works, zero issues. Alain also supports his stuff 100% so you can ask him for assistance setting up as well.
×
×
  • Create New...