bephanten

if your second engine is not starting, tell crew to apply air for a second time. odd it is.

ai will abandon the plane with empty fuel, even on final approach or on the flare over the runway. spit_fuel.trk

once, nick the gray told a story that a new gunsight was being forged deep within mount doom.

same problem here. works ok for first time. then it does not work. i also have a keyboard modifier bound to the pov button for the command.

does this thing have aesa radar simulated?

as title says, i see a weight difference about 300lb between civil plane checked/unchecked. it has no effect on 3d model. i deselect external hardpoints. maybe dcs is simulating the burden of ptsd?

Exactly. Jug is a good diver too. But ai and its flight model is joke. There is no energy fighting routines for ai.

The devs may have decided this exclusively for fucke Wolfe's. They can recover from high speed dives relatively easily. Try chasing a diving Dora to the deck. You may likely lose control and crash.

an ai spitfire with attached bombs in belly and wing hardpoints also fly and dogfight like the sleek one. it can climb and turn with the german birds. i set up a mission where i have a clear altitude and weight advantage against a jettison restricted bomb loaded spitfire. it can defend my bnz with pulling endless verticals. in same scenario, a p47 cannot pull same verticals.

new sounds are waay better. it feels like a proper engine now. but the rpm surge of mw-50 still feels odd.

ed should have a guideline for canopy glass graphics. starting with, no effect should hinder total visibility under any condition. i've waited so long for new spitfire cockpit, and the old blinding sunlight reflection has carried over to new cockpit. i don't know, if you're planning to solve these problems with vulkan raytracing. but there is definitly a problem with testing. i would have rejected the new canopy. the effects should be subtle, not in your face.

Impressive. I hope your framework becomes a standard for DCS modules and other 3rd party developers

Does virtual component system allow failures in individual warning panel lights. Like there is a fuel system problem, but it's warning light is faulty.

How would a 3d model update by developer would affect this project?

I was kind of wondering about use of raytraced audio and procedural audio. There are limitations to the current engine. For example engine sound does not behave similar to gun sound, where you can hear delay with gun sound based on distance but any change in motor rpm will be heard instantly in external camera.