Gunar_Konrad

Contact support from ED and your bank, to make sure payment was made.

Same over here. I managed to load paypal page and now, "Payment processing... Please wait".

I choose paypal, I got "the selected payment method failed. Please contact the site administrator". So I guess there is a lot of people trying to pay at the same time.

I reported it few days ago. But I think it is not noted yet.

Hi, I will try to explain what I was experimenting. I was doing some fuel testing for my missions, and I found the already reported bug regarding asimetric fuel loads for less than 50% setting on DCS Editor. However this not the bug I was experimenting. Increasing the fuel amount using the crew will load the outer tanks more than inner until they got all full, all good so far, if you reach 100% or just load the plane at 100% using editor, and then call the crew to unload it to 75% will unload compeltely the outer tanks... however if you try 74% or less, the crew will never finish to unload fuel, seems like they only unload the outers and then become a bug. Second issue, i found transfering fuel from external drop to outers, 50 gallons tanks seems to transfer only 25 gallons, and 100 gallons tanks only transfer 50 galls to outers. It is intended in that way? I know irl some fuel remain on tanks but 50% seem too much. Thanks.

I did not see any difference when I drop ir at 100% +- 2%. So, once you reach 100% external tank is pretty empty.

Hi, I approach the target from a side, I use the graphic reference using the canopy/wings borders. Just experiment your references, use tacview to polish that. Once you got your spot for your personal diving angle, then you only have to practice. I personally prefer start diving sround 6-6.5 thousand feets, using the canopy border where the clock is, and dive on idle towards the target, diving a little hard, releasing at 2000ft.

Harrier on hold for me due this reason.

Thanks.

Are the owners of SU27 (dedicated, not FC3) getting the J11? Or it is just for FC3 owners alone? I read somethng about when J11 was introduced, something like on the future we will give the J11 to SU27 owners, however some time already passed and no news about it. Any idea? Thanks.

I am ok with the racks. Would be a nice feature if they modelled the rack shortcomings also. The thing, is Iranians tested that rack, but nobody knows how it goes with it. Maybe ok for Iranians cats, but not accurate for US Navy cats as F14A got removed the capability to carry those racks.

That is the stuff behind the never used rack for multiple Mk82-

Only Iranians did a live test (according to them), but nobody knows details. US Navy wind tunnel study concludes the 4 Mk82 TERs were just dangerous as bombs will collide among them after drop. No Contracts signed. Never used to drop a single bomb with US Navy.

Multiple Mk82 eyectors were not even tested on a live plane, US Navy tested them on wind tunnel and conlcude they were not reliable and bombs will hit among them making the whole stuff dangeorus and unpredictable. So Us Navy never adquired those eyectors. Iran in the other hand tested on combat, but no information available about it. I have the original report if someone wanted it.

1 to 4

Not sure, But I think pilot can not shoot AIM 54. Just the RIO.

Same over here.

I also think the price is closer to cheaper than to a expensive. As a guy said up here, we are getting the A and nice assets. I wuold say its actually a really nice quality-price relation.

I am not expecting any Razbam module during 2018. I will be happy with a couple patches for Harrier and M2000C.

Unfortunately for customers, RAZBAM wont dedicate enough time to it for fixes. In my opinion Mirage 2000C is a mediocre product, and will still like that. Some customers are ok with the product, some not. But at the end, fidelity will be very low compared to other modules, and that is my scale to measure quality. I hope to be wrong. But after all this time... If they fix the FM at least, my opinion about the M2000C will change from Scam to Bad purchase.