Jump to content

Spirale

Members
  • Posts

    342
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Spirale

  1. The best would have been to create a poll " what is the best campaign" ( paid or not). Some free campaign are amazing and the work huge, i think of " Bold Cheetah " from Sedlo. If Bold Cheetah would have been in your list i woud have have voted for it
  2. Hi Bignewy, i fly mainly in VR and it is way slower but thx for your reply
  3. Hi, Check this video: IRL Su 25 low level fight shows real feel of speed It seems that DCS in way sloower in speed perception. Objects or Trees are to big? Thx
  4. This morning i'opened the DCS M2000 forum ( always happy to do this) and saw there was a new post in this "update section" sub-forum. At first i was amazed and exited to read this update.....until i read your post....
  5. This campaign is free and deserve much more attention, this campaign is totally on par with paid ones: Thx a lot for such a quality piece of work
  6. Same problem here and my cable is brand new...
  7. Hi, would it be possible to fly this amazing campaign with 2 humans on board by simply editing the slot " player" ---> " client"? I did that in Regorger II 1st mission and it worked BUT in Regorger I campaign, none of this was good: my RIO buddy was indeed "in" the cat but was not able to do anything with the radar... Our beloved Tomcat is a two seater, it will be fantastic to be able to fly with a buddy because this a free campaign and no licence is mandatory for both players Thx for your futur replies
  8. Thx a lot for your hard work Rudel, the Viggen deserve more attention and you help to it a lot
  9. You are not thanked enough, so ......THX for your hard work and outstanding quality which leads to an unmatched immersion
  10. If the game makes a simple check, why is it not allowed to the Viggen to do the same then when the other aircrafts can? (even if in the Viggen it is a simple "answer" and not an emit) So, with all your comments above, could we considered the Viggen features complete without this two fonctions ( which are "not relevant)? If yes, why the Viggen, after all these years, is till in EA? ( that was my last sentense of my first post)? If all is fully fonctionnal why the EA status is till attached to the Viggen?
  11. In the Mirage F1 you can set a frequency even it is a "cheat" or whatever. Just to say to other aircraft " it is me i am not the ugly guy". My previous question was : would it be possible to create the same possibility as Mirage F1 even if everybody knows DCS does not simulate the real IFF transponder behavior? For the anti jammer filter: if i follow your logic the whole data link for planes like F 14, F 16, F16 should be removed because it is absolutly not a real datalink ( it is hardly classified) and DCS simulated a wrong datalink. A previous post mentioned the JA37 ( wonder beauty!) and the possibility to have it modeled by you HB. Someone reply: the datalink is too classified, it is not possible to do this aircraft blahblahblah...If i follow your logic, ED should remove all "his" F'x jets which all have a datalink, a false one...But they choosed to model a fake data link and people fly their aircraft with datalink even if it is a false one...and they sell their module, they make money with them. Same would apply to missile burn through: nobody knows ( except irl pilots) the real value of the burn through. If i follow your logic , all Fox3 missiles shouldn't be modeled, simulated cause it is not relevant? They all should be removed? Why not simulate a system that would resemble to the IRL one. In DCS you have different sams and airbornes radar/ emitters with different radar waves, why would'nt the viggen have the possibility to adjust, tune, what wave come to him? RCS more tuned will come in the next update, DCS simulated a lot of different waves aspects and returns. Nobody will have the real data, all the DCS planes ( exept may be the warbirds) do not have real data for radar, emitters, rwr, IFF but some are simulated by ED, why not by HB?
  12. For this panel IFF i does not agree with you. F16, F18, Mirage 2000 and Mirage F1 have IFF even the Mig 21. Even if it is an " ersatz" of IFF it is simulated like this but ....exists in DCS.
  13. Hi, I own my beloved Viggen since day one and when i look righ in the cockpit i see the panel " IFF Transpondeur" inert, non fonctional. When I look left i see the knob " anti jammers filter": some told me it was fonctional, i don't see any difference in use...And there is nothing detailled in the manual about that et it different modes... Our Viggen is a very interesting and well modeled aircraft except this two items above so when will the Viggen will be out of EA and this two panels fonctionals? Thx A huge fan of the Viggen
  14. Yes the Mirage F1 feels "alive" while flying! A great sensation! I am a huge fan of the Viggen, like you Travis i have nearly all of them and i think the Mirage F1M will be a great challenger to the Viggen in term of sensations/ capabilities/ fun to fly One word Aerges: THX!
  15. I've posted monthes ago about this campaign and i can say it is a blast to fly, and your campaign Sedlo is on par (may be superior in certain areas) with the paid ones
  16. Hi, since today i have this message....Impossible to connect my name account. Yesterday worked fine wihtout any problem. Help needed please. Thx ps: my clock is set on the right time and region
  17. Hi , I would like to know IRL how did the pilots to send a bullseye position or communicate about it ? It will be handy. I suppose in DCS we have to put a known point relative to the bullseye but....how to extract this position without a reference point in flight? I hope our beloved Viggen will become better and better ( i till think about the jammer filter for example)^^ Thx
×
×
  • Create New...