Jump to content

dundun92

Members
  • Posts

    1314
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dundun92

  1. Wow thats an impressive G onset lol
  2. Also question for deka: do you guys actually model the datalink signal for inertial guidance, or is this simply something that wouldnt be possible in DCS
  3. Chizh, could you outline the ECM changes that happened the patch before last? There is a noticeable difference.
  4. FWIW he never attacked the CCM, it was the uber low drag, which has been fixed.
  5. ED has NEVER fixed bugs like this quickly. That F-18 radar bug took MONTHS to be fixed. Nobody was whining every patch because it wasnt fixed when they wanted. Making up conspiracy theories just make this look like you expect the game to revolve around your favorite third party aircraft. Be patient and wait, like everyone else has been for the other aircraft. It took, what, years to get the AMRAAM fixed? Meanwhile you guys got realistic SD-10s just a few months after release. This has nothing to do with ED "not caring" or nerfing 3rd parties.
  6. At this point I will take anything that doesnt pull infinite loops
  7. Also you wouldnt be able to IFF without STTing people. So yea dont see why youd want to tbh
  8. F-16 and F/A-18 do however and our Flanker faces them all the time in DCS.
  9. If that were the case 9Ms would cool either
  10. Perhaps it was notched? The same thing happens to 120s
  11. +1 Look at 5:51 here
  12. So when someone disagrees with you it automatically makes you right, and "confirms" that we all are immature? :doh:
  13. Just a thread for my DCS vids, mostly PvP. Most are from either GrowlingSidewinders server, or the 104th, and occasionally blueflag. Sometimes when I forget to record I will just upload the tacview.
  14. Did you look at the tacview ans measure the actual TOF's?
  15. The F-15 will reach max G VERY quickly, faster than anything else ive flown in DCS, that may be the cause. As GG said G onset plays a big role due to DCSs G modeling.
  16. I see you didnt read the FM paper... https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=281651
  17. That clip was hilarious, I like how that taxing F-15 just flipped and crashed.
  18. This has NOTHING to do with FMs, ED stated this clearly. It purely affects the numbers shown to us in the cockpit, nothing else
  19. Maybe the bandit went into AB, then dropped to mil?
  20. I can takeoff from the old kuz just fine
  21. If you cant make it more accurate, just make the damage radius bigger!
  22. Often I dont even feel like touching the trim as I cannot ever get it back to normal in planes like the F-16:megalol:
  23. Yep its been known for a while, 9Ls are useless in the F-16/18 rn. The 9L should be all aspect like the 9M. From the AIM-9L SMC:
  24. The problem with that reasoning is a), you also likely have an inbound missile to defend, and b) IRL you defend based on MAR, not whether you have a missile launch warning, as you cannot depend on missiles giving an initial warning. IRL you arent gonna go "more defensive" because you have a launch warning than without. You are going to assume he has launched unless you can absolutely prove he hasnt, initial launch warning or not. In the DCS environment, against lower SA opponents it would be somewhat useful, but IRL, or even in DCS against opponents with decent SA and knowledge of stuff like MAR I doubt it would be very effective.
  25. no it hasnt.
×
×
  • Create New...