tarball

seems like a significant regression as most quality tutorials an references suggest that the flashing ATK on the HUD is there to help return to gimbal limits.

what became of this?

Is the new 2.0 version self updating? I can't quite tell from the UI.

Very interesting omission here.

Thanks. The manual in the Release version is older and the manual in the Open Beta version is newer, but not RC7 either.

Perhaps a silly question, but I'm guessing these updates only apply to Open Beta for the time being?

Straight to OB or will it appear in stable?

this needs to be stickied

Thanks for the post, going to check it out now. I sometimes wonder why ED bothers with a Beta/Stable version when things like this don't make it to the stable version. Then again, perhaps the 2020 version isn't finalized either. About to find out...

The bigger bug is the reflection. I wish FC3 got more love.

This too is my number one flown aircraft in DCS, far and away. Something about the Rook is compelling. Great ground attack and handling. I'd love a full fidelity as well. Ditto for nearly all the Russian aircraft.

old bugs, inconsistent and not up-to-date documentation. Then I see the ambitious product roadmap and realize that ED enjoys almost perfect market monopoly in their space. Despite this, they will be taking on the AAA, Ace Combat, Air-Quake space with Modern Combat. DCS is a pretty girl and gets away with these flaws. BMS is and older and not-as-pretty gal and has to deliver the goods, But yes, thank you for pointing this out as I love flying both the frogs.

I can't tell the rhyme or reason for what is fixed or not in DCS but these errors are very annoying as they remain in place for YEARS. Why would I have confidence in other products when simple products are left like this for a long time?

It seems DCS 2.5.2.18736.400 may have fixed this? can anyone confirm?

Why does this manual "dance" persist if this is a known performance issue? Why wouldn't the game do this internally? Just curious.

Thanks for your hard work Skatezilla. Is your utility a pass-through to the DCSUpdater command-line tool?

Thank you.

Help, I am using 2.3.0 and I set a MISSION START trigger to take a DO_SCRIPT_FILE action to load Moose.lua from here: https://github.com/FlightControlMaster/MOOSE/releases/download/2.3.0/Moose.lua I can't get anything in Moose to run after that.

when is this new version good to go?

Old thread but... Since so many props have been placed into DCS, how's about the Skyraider?

I only have the Wikipedia entry to go on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-25 However, the SU-25SM seems to be the "plan." Given the Caucasus theater we've used for so long in DCS, perhaps I should have inquired about the SU-25KM as it is Georgia's way of keeping some sort of production of the SU-25 alive. I realize one must already mostly give up on timelines as the aircraft featured are all over the place, but modernizing the Frogfoot would be interesting.

Hello, I tried to post this in "Wish list" but that forum doesn't seem to allow posting right now. I love the SU-25/SU-25T. I like how ED keeps things going with both Russian and western equipment. The SU-25 is such an important aircraft, I was hoping we may see the SU-25SM standard at some point. Thanks.

I've had a similar experience - had to bail really quickly after the fuel leak. However, I'm still so new with the SU-25 (haven't played Flaming Cliffs for a decade), that I wasn't sure if that was just normal. I love the simple frogfoot and fly it almost exclusively.

Interesting question, but there is not a Shkval in the SU-25, you are probably using the SU-25T.

I see this problem too.