Jump to content

jojyrocks

Members
  • Posts

    463
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS World Steam edition.

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Будут ли когда-нибудь эффекты пара в FC3? Я надеялся увидеть эти эффекты в последнем обновлении FC3. Он есть только у МиГ-29.
  2. Will FC3 ever add vapour effects like the Mig 29 FC3 module has?
  3. I was also hoping that they add the vapour effects to almost all FC3 planes like the FC3 Mig 29 has...it feels as though something is missing out.
  4. I was hoping that ED would add some VAPOUR EFFECTS for the all the FC3 planes like they did with the Mig 29...
  5. Mirage f1ee startup bug.trk Or...am I doing something wrong in the steps?
  6. I can engine start the Mirage BE and CE just fine, but the EE version is now not starting up, the engine does not spool. BE and CE starts just fine. I tried this in the Instant missions, cold start missions.
  7. I hope they do the F-104 model that has a gun...it did house the famed M61 Vulcan cannon first...then there is that famed engine howl.
  8. Finally! My dream come true... Now comes the wait...2026 maybe...
  9. I am just emphasizing that it is impossible to that in DCS Hornet. You cannot keep the nose up by modulating the stick with full flaps. It is possible with half flaps. But IRL it is seen being done by these pilots, despite NATOPS SOP, pilots seems to do it, especially in airshows and non Navy users. The emphasis is on the part of "doability"/possibility and not about following NATOPS SOP to the letter when we clearly see here, pilots doing just that, not following the NATOPS to the letter, especially non navy users of these planes, Hornet and the Tomcat. Anyway, its a softer smooth landing without smashing it in when you land in land bases, longer runway. Aerobraking is a skill in itself, to modulate the stick for that smooth braking on ample runways. Weather conditions also matter though...
  10. I voted for F-105 and the AH-1 But I do not think there is much data on F-105 to make a module.
  11. Flare nose up aerobrake touchdown in the F-14 is doable like the Iranians do on runway landing. For USN...only demo pilots seem to do it. Despite NATOPS saying not to...even USN pilots, especially demo pilots do it. In DCS it is possible if you land without cutting power to full idle and just modulate the throttle and pitch after rear wheels touch.
  12. I was only quoting the Hornet coz we see Finnish pilots doing it with their Hornets and even in sometimes we do see even in the Super Hornet doing aerobrake landing by USN pilots. Despite NATOPS manuals saying otherwise, some pilots do this when landing on runways. It is also SUPER hard almost impossible to do a long flare nose up with the Hornet in DCS. But with half flaps it flaring and aerobrake is easy.
  13. Iranians do it and even some USN demo pilots do it and even aerobrake the landing. Finnish air force does it with their Hornets too, flare and aerobrake a bit. In DCS flight modelling on that is a bit off as it is impossible to land with aerobraking on Hornet. With the F14, you need to land with a bit of power to aerobrake on Runway. So, it is possible and doable. Not flaring thing is meant only when you land on carrier.
  14. +1 Hopefully, we'll see this around 2025.
  15. Somewhere down the line, the Super Hornet would be a great addition, any early possible ones, expecting an E version as F version would be just too complicated and time consuming to develop concerning the time phase. If possible, whatever is easier for ED or whichever third party takes this up.
×
×
  • Create New...