Vannipo

35fps are acceptable for U?

That effect will fade away when your brain gets used to it the next weeks. It learns the dfference of VR and RL.

Maybe no need to put on the HMD while in the menues or mission editor? I want to FLY in VR. Not menue in VR.

That's a problem, how DCS alignes the cloud sprites to the camera. They use the roll of the camera as upvector instead of the worlds up axis. Would be ez to fix.

Just a simple answer to a simple question in the first post. Just execute: ..\DCS version\bin\DCS_updater.exe and DCS will update to the latest version. Doesn't matter which one u have already installed.

Solved. Got new cams!

Just set up this button as a modifier in DCS.

i7 5820k, 6 real cores @4.6ghz. 32GB RAM The Fps on my old 980 ti where as expected with my grafic settings. So, I needed a 1080 ti to get to stable 45 fps. I dont need ASW. I hit 45 fps at any time with nice looking graphix. And ASW doesnt give me more fps. I would never turn any shadows off. If my GPU cant handle shadows on high fps, I need a better GPU. :thumbup:

Its not worth it

Logical conclusion could be: Use another glass shader for the viggen, until ED fixed it.

I think, RAZBAM has to ensure a nice workflow, that Mavs follow the TV or tpod again (after you have locked a target), without having to reset everything and begin from zero. I can't imagine that it's that complicated IRL for the pilots?

btw, for me, the afterburner has visually too less power. Pls match it more to RL-Footage as seen attached. On the DCS screenshot, it should glow like hell in this dark low sun condidtion.

Through the canopy glass of the viggen, there is something strange happening. Especially good to see on low sun conditions. For comparison a screenshot in the same situation in the Sabre. 3rd pircure shows, that it only happens behind the canopy glass. Outside, it looks normal.

Automatically? Hmm, I dont have that here. Did u disable easy comms in the game options?

Hmm, for me even a 980ti OC was too slow. And really need nice gfx. It let me enjoy the flight much more!

yellow writing?? u mean green?

Everything in all flight models is a try to get nearly real flight behaviors. Nothing is "real" simulated. If u would try to simulate a flying aircraft, one frame would take e.g. 2 days to be calculated. U would need a fluid simulation with all properties of air and the particles in it. So, of course the flight models in DCS are not perfect. And I agree, there are in some situations strange behaviors.

never change a running system. :smartass:

Nope. Just read the first post, including the screenshot. This Button 6 in the VPC Software. Its just a ghost. The T50 has 19 Buttons + POV.

Sadly, no reactions on eMails anymore... I don't like that. Hopefully, the new cams are on their way...

The runway lights should simply be brighter. I really have problems in VR to see the runway from a long distance. The whole sourounding area is more lit than the runway.

Hi. The water level on the PG Map is too low. Or the landscape too high? Partly. :) Steep coastlines everywhere and I can see textures, which otherwise definetly belongs under water. Or maybe it's Work in Progress Regards

No, I think anybody has it, but just doesn't recognize it: The complete water level in PG-Map is too low. I see ground, which otherwise belongs under water everywhere.

Yes, I can "tdc" the IRMAV again, or the TV again, but I can't get the IRMAV following the TV again. And that's all about.