Wolf Rider
-
Posts
2008 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Wolf Rider
-
-
Hi
Similar here too, as far as the warning level remaining with warning expired
-
Not too sure where to put this post, so apologies, if in the wrong section...
Running update for Alpha and this warning splashes up -
-
I just updated from 2.0.1.56747 to the latest. When I take off from nellis and get airborne in the A10 or F15 (using IR Tracker) I will look left or right and down it hesitates. When I get to the race way and turn left look around the image will stop for a split second then catch up. Did not have this problem with previous versions. Two tracks logs and settings in zip.
To note its the small details that count. I was working on a mission and went to my templates and I see that there in alphabetical order.:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
That made my day. Good work ED.
What is your Operating System?
also, by the side... the Z77 is an unstable chipset (something to consider)
-
[ame]
[/ame] -
[ame]
[/ame] -
-
.
-
ILS Localiser HSI indications Bugged All aircraft
This is a long standing bug even from FC3 days and now still visible in the Mirage 2000C where it is especially eye catching because of the size of the HUD localiser reference.
Once established on the localiser or close to it the HSI or (HUD ILS localiser in Mir 2000) does not smoothly respond to localiser deviations. What it does do is instantly respond to bank changes. For instance if it is slightly deflected to the left and you smoothly apply a left bank correction the Localiser reference immediately reacts opposite the bank input. In the case of the Mir 2000 the localiser HUD line will even move to the opposite side of the velocity vector !
Given this behavior occurs in all aircraft it is a DCS thing and not module specific. the behavior is incorrect as the Localiser steering reference cannot be used for its explicit purpose .... that is to provide a steering reference to intercept and maintain the ILS localiser.
This is incorrect as it cant be used as a steering reference.
I remember there was some argument a while back regarding this scenario... the argy bargy seemed to have been between repeater and Flight Director function.
The distinction was between the "repeater" indicating where the pilot was, in relation to the beam, and the "Flight Director" indicating where the pilot should steer toward to be on beam ( 30° bank, I believe ).... is this what you're referring to?
-
Okay... it appears to may have go into the sim Options/ Control A10C SIM section and pull down thew HOTAS Options... in there, clear out the flight command pitch, Roll, yaw etc and reassign them.
Basically the warthog stick is already set up in game, external software not actually required for it to run as intended, but on occasion there are some settings which do need to be checked.... on stick Trim does need to be reassigned away from default view settings though
-
-
Are you asking, if a user posts something that violates the rules, but then goes back and deletes it or edits?
~
That is the question, my friend, and okay, a fair enough point you've made in the latter part of your post (not quoted)
But the point of the question is; if that post (in original form) no longer exists in the Forum front end, it no longer exists in the thread which any of the general Forum membership can view, that being the thread the general member views.
Sure, it may have come through on 'subscription to the thread' (which is what I think is meant there in the above quoted post), IF they have chosen to do so... but, if they (who may have subscribed) choose to follow that link(?) back to the thread... and that post (in its original form) no longer exists; Does not that say something? The 'unsubscribed' general member, that being The General Audience, would not be aware of what was was, or isn't, so to speak
The terms listed, seem to have been set by a very high level (referring back to the Opening Post of this thread) and in a question relating to the OP, its a situation which could have an unintended consequence... this is the question. Lets be very clear on this, this is the question.
So, I would be asking the level which has set this thread, to consider my question and premise - if you like, it can be done over the PM system
-
Its all good Sithspawn don't worry I wasn't having a go or bored either Pitot :P :) , I was just wondering
-
This was already explained to you, your post was deleted (by a moderator) because it violated rules, you didnt edit it, you didnt delete it.
I'm asking an honest question on something entirely different, Sithspawn, and on topic :)
-
A question to ask (of the higher ups) at this point is; How can a User Edited/ Deleted post ( ie a general member, who only has access to the frontend of the forum), who has chosen to edit their post (for whatever reason), or just plain out deleted their post (again, for whatever reason); have that same User pre edited/ deleted post used in the above situation of the rules as set?
Once a General Member has deleted, or, edited a post, that general member considers the post as No Longer In Existence, for the purposes of this or any other forum? sorry, but this is the way its seen by front end users (different in the Real World, for sure, but that's the legalities of the real world and Emails).
How does that play with the rules as set in the OP?
-
That is sort of what won the debate for me. I was repeatedly told that you couldnt hear such noises with the engine running, so I asked if the engine was dead, could you hear them... then all of a sudden they were in the sim :)
Its a fine balance with DCS, we dont want to turn it into an arcade flying game BUT small subtle things that help you *feel* the aircraft better are needed, especially with these old birds that required your butt in the seat even more than these fancy new fangled flying machines.
thing is though mate... if the engines is dead, at flight time, surely the pilot wouldn't be banging their stick against the seat... oh, and is that a trumpet I hear blowing?
On the ground, during pre flight check, the banging thing could well be a possibility though - who knows just how rough some pilots may be with their stick
- jus' sayin'
-
1
-
-
For our friends up over...
-
[ame]
[/ame][ame]
[/ame] -
[ame]
[/ame] -
Rip Bill Ham Ave atque Vale
'Eliminator" (late 80's), was one of the best R'n'R tours I ever did and kudos for what you did for the good ol' boys mate
[ame]
[/ame] -
Sw is starway dlc. It brings me fps ☺
I use one monitor in 4k.
fair enough mate
another gave similar regarding 4k monitor... not much help I can give ya there, except to start with a fresh vanilla (no addon/ no DLC) install and take it step by step, trying all graphics options first before bringing in the 'mods' ( Starway boasts high res textures - something to consider )
Hope you get it sorted
-
Please, would it be possible to look at the time out settings, with the 'remember me' tick box unchecked? atm, its barely enough time to get one post off, and is far too short
and also, with the 'remember me' tick box checked... 24 hours also seems way too short ( I'm sure vBulletin would not have put the 'remember me' option in, if it was a server issue )
Thanking you for your consideration
-
7
-
-
Dial your Traffic down to low... there's one of the bugbears of another FPS killer
and I don't know what 'SW texture pack" is... so, if you're using mods, you are at their mercy
Plus you don't delineate between all settings... only some
16x Anisotropic, is way too high :)
Also... judging by your Resolution, you seem to be using more than one monitor? If you are, unfortunately, the sim is still CPU bound and there isn't much hope for that on the horizon ( my settings are based on a single 1920x 1080 monitor )
cheers
-
[ame]
[/ame] -
Found it mate :)
Yes I benched with a lot of settings. Here are my settings to play over Bantumi with vsync and never go under 60fps :I changed nothing in NVidia Control Panel or NVInspector.
Okay, from my limited lingual skills...
Turn
Anticrenelage Gamma Correction: to OFF negative (this one is a frame rate killer)
Anticrenelage - Transparence: to 4x
filrtage de texture - quality: to High Quality
Distortion LOD negative, to the other option(clamp)
Optimisation Threadee to Off (negative) because the sim is an old enterprise (no offense) and doesn't take advantage of multicore processing as such
Syncronistaion vertical: to ON (if you're running DCS 2.0 you will have to run the sim in fullscreen (ALT+ENTER ) mode, edit the applicable LUA file or set an Auotexecute file)
And I don't seem to see it, but turn the Frame Buffer (for OPENGL only function to OFF)
Is there something wrong w/ the warning system?
in Forum and Site Issues
Posted
cheers mate