Jump to content

Starfighter

Members
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Yeah, that one. It was hilarious. Really challenging with the Mirage, but doable. We wanted to do timed runs in the near future..
  2. Are you serious? That was such a fun part of the map. We just discovered it and had plans for so many missions which include the canyon.. now its gone. I know the existence of the canyon was probably a "bug" all along, but I know nobody who ever had a problem with that. Even the people who really care a lot about realism didnt mind it being there, so far off of the usual playgrounds on this map. Is there any chance you can bring it back?
  3. Hot rearming would be awesome. I have a different problem tho: The plane rolls backwards when the throttle is idle. I have to move my stick to like 15-20% to keep it in place. Is this intentional?
  4. Short answer: It worked like described in the linked FAQ. Dont know why so many posts said that you cant transfer from Steam anymore after the new keys got introduced.
  5. Come on guys, no one can give a quick "yes" or "no"? What confuses me is that apparently, after the Steam version got new keys instead of old starforce keys, the modules cant be transfered to normal DCS anymore. Thats what I read in many threads. However, on this FAQ: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/support/faq/500/#1510447 under the section "How to transfer keyless DCS modules purchased on STEAM?" there is an explanation on how to apparently still do it. Now whats right? Im just cunfused guys.
  6. Hello together, I would like to know how the current situation about modules bought on steam regarding a transfer to the standalone version looks like. I obviously see the sticky post that all post-Mirage modules cant be transfered, but I also see some more recent post which indicate that is it (again?) possible. Reason is, I still have a steam gift card and once the sale hits Steam, I would like to grab a Viggen or Harrier while its on discount with my gift card, but only if its possble to activate them on the normal version, where i already have a couple of other modules installed. Long question, short answer, is it possible or not?
  7. Well there was that statement a while back
  8. What about putting ordnance under the wings while aligning? Will I need to do the small 90 second alignment after that or is it only necessary when no alignment is running when changing the loadout?
  9. Wait so you mean once the 8min-alignment is started, I can do whatever I want and take-off without screwing the alignment?
  10. Would much rather have the Tornado as well..
  11. I've been busy testing the GBU-usage with the Mirage now, and successfully engaged stationary tanks and structures. However, if I assign the JTAC to lase a ship, it just says "no targets available" when starting radio comms. The JTAC has a clear line of sight and is well within range to the ship. Tested with some russian destroyers and cargo ships. Is it even possible to get a JTAC lasing a ship for you? If yes whats the trick?
  12. Thanks for the information! Good to know.
  13. Also, I'm 95% sure I submitted this to the M2000 subforum rather than the normal Razbam one, maybe someone can move the thread.
  14. Hi, I have a couple of problems with different A2G platforms in the Mirage. First, in the official manual, it says that the BLG-66 is able to be used in CCRP bombing. However, when I select them, it automatically shows the normal CCIP interface and I have no clue how to change that. Since the Belugas are cluster bombs, it would make a lot more sense for me to release them in a horizontal flight rather than a normal CCIP dive attack for a bigger spread of the clusters, especially since dive attacks in the Mirage appear to be extremely steep and thus reducing the spread of the bomblets even more. For this CCRP would be really helpful I suppose. Next, will the GBU-24 ever get fixed? It still has a low-res model and doesnt follow laser guidance. I've read in other threads that this is the case for years now. I personally would think that its not THAT much work to make the 24 usable, and it would certainly be nice to have a 1k-guided bomb on the M2K. As far as I know Razbam isnt responsible for the GBUs, but does anyone here know if some officials have ever made a little statement about these in the last time? Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...