It would seem the burden
of research was on you the consumer they did their job telling you what plane and variant you were getting and it's your fault for not doing your due diligence on the topic.
Lack of information on the plane in the west? I doubt it highly the Russians are very proud of the plane rightly so as it was a watershed moment in aviation history and it had quite an impressive service life. And many books have also been published in English as well like those by Mikhail Maslov. His books might be a good place to start to spare you any further embarrassment though you might be used to it.
I'm probably not skilled enough but this seems like it could turn out to be very very interesting though
Su-27s with 2 ERs and 4 R-27Rs might be the hardest opponents
Would it be outside of the realm of possibility to see other variants of it as well such as the J-7M or are only 90s and 2000s varaints being considered
Ah ok so your claims are BS until you can prove them.
It still doesn't explain why SAMs and airborne radars from that era do not produce the same results from the manual and that is the crux of the issue something you just can't seem to grasp for whatever reason and resort to falsely attributing claims to me.
I already did its in the OP here is another thread that goes more in depth
https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=168915
I wonder if you can do the same for your claims
And? So does this mean when literally anything locks it up it should behave like this? No it does not.
I am not asking for a good RWR I am asking for an accurate one and what we have simply isn't that.
I would like to ask when if at all the developers will start working to fix the SPO-10 RWR?
As seen in this link they've been aware of the bug to some extent for a while right, at least 4 years.
https://leatherneck-sim.mantishub.io/view.php?id=51
But they don't seem to do anything about it at all is it that they've possibly forgotten about it.
A dev response official or unofficial would be very nice
It doesn't change the fact the SPO-10 is not behaving correctly in game.
I wonder why M3 has not mentioned anything about the SPO-10 in this update
Do they wish to surprise us at a later date or do they not see anything wrong with its current implementation in game?
I added a track of it if anyone is curious, it feels off but you guys could probably tell the difference.
Strongest wind I've ever flown in for sure if thats the case
Hello, trying to fly this campaign is becoming hard when my plane wants to suddenly veer off course for no reason what so ever. I don't know what could be the cause for it, the load is not asymmetrical so what could it be, weather conditions?
I know the damage done because I have been on both sides have had missiles whack me head on and have fired close enough shots with as I said before not only R-60s but bigger missiles like AIM-9s and R-73s too see the eagle continue fighting as though nothing at all had happened after direct head on hits.
I've one too many a time run into F-15s that just won't go down after a missile hit even head on regardless of missile type, AIM-9s, R-60s what have you.
Will ED do anything in coming updates to rectify this issue?
Have they acknowledged it?
Hello I had an issue with 2 AI MiG-21Bis set to High with clean stores and no pods, regardless of this they still used flares and chaff.
The AI was also being strange and shooting from impossible positions as in
The gun would have to be on top of the plane in a movable mount
I could not find a way to add the tac view but I did attach a track.