Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Shimmergloom667

  • Birthday 04/14/1979

Personal Information

  • Location
    Bochum, Germany

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Whenever the stable version is updated - lately that has happened around 2 - 3 weeks after the OB patch.
  2. I just accept that helicopters crab when aerodynamically trimmed. No big deal. I trim nose-tail when I need it (landing, NOE flight, stuff like that)
  3. It being on in Cold&Dark state probably was wrong, have to follow procedures and turn it on, now
  4. Same here, literally just took off from Cold&Dark, started RALT, active after a few seconds, no issues
  5. That is due to not all DCS maps having map image files for all scales included. That is, ultimately, something for the map creators to do and not an Apache bug.
  6. It's for Ugra to fix, and as Bunny Clark said: probably the map itself took precedence, since we got it expanded quite a bit now
  7. And nothing of that would be part of a ~2005 Hornet, which is modeled in DCS. Oh wait, it's you, so it would be a fruitless discussion anyway.
  8. Basically every TGP implementation except the LANTIRN on the F-14 is overperforming as compared to RL. So I think every bit of degradation, every bit of bloom, athmospheric impediment etc. is a good thing.
  9. But why? Are you in a hurry? It's not like it's yesterday's news (speaking about sims) after 6 years.
  10. Carrier ops, better ergonomics, more varied loadout and capabilities, carrier ops, better user interface, more capable sensorics with better usability, carrier ops - everything the F-18 has in the cockpit feels like someone at MDD looked at the F-16 and made a better version of it. (And the Hornet just looks SO MUCH better)
  11. I know people who refuel flying with keyboard. I used a crappy X56 and had no issues. Good hardware sure doesn't hurt, but it is NOT needed for AAR.
  12. Abandoning would mean "stopping on working on it for good", which clearly is not the case.
  13. Man, you guys are pessimists. Yes, it would be great if stuff got finished faster, especially since the Hornet is at a very high level of completion already and we are using it for so long - but now it's the Viper's turn, and it sorely needs it. As we saw, a lot of Hornet developments speeded up Viper development, and later on we will profit off that in the Hornet as well because stuff will arrive faster. Judging the Hornet to be "abandoned" is just absurd. A bit on the backburner? Yeah, obviously. That will change in good time. Just my 0.02$, I am not in a hurry.
  14. Build your own missions, leave out AA threats, done.
  • Create New...