DBFlyguy

Thanks for the clarification! My wallet is slightly upset with me.... but I'm a happy camper to finally have the F-15E

It's showing as $64.99 on Steam, is there no EA price for Steam?

@NineLine @BIGNEWY would you mind looking into this? Steam is only showing "for owners of 44", "for owners of both 44 and Channel" or "full purchase"

I own Channel Map on Steam. I'm only see options for "Full Map" $49.99, "If you have Normandy 1944 Map" $14.99 and "If you own both Normandy 1944 and Channel map" $9.99 . I thought the $14.99 discount was if you own either Normandy or Channel map?

336th FS (Seymour Johnson AFB) Flagship:

Surprised no one has posted this classic yet:

Initially both crew were pilots then the USAF went to one pilot with a WSO, I think the USN always had a pilot and WSO/RIO. Mover did an interview with a Vietnam era F-4 pilot who talks about this:

Fair point!

The correct answer is Olds or Robin. null null

This is ED's typical behavior towards 3rd parties unfortunately ... Is it really that hard to update your supposed business partners on obviously important information... Not a surprise they had no clue about the Razbam Harrier dumpster fire or all the issues Heatblur had to deal with concerning getting the Tomcat compatible with the Supercarrier or AIM-54 issues... At what point does ED actually address repeating issues?

Its plain as day on the advertisement that the module included both the A and B for $80 from day one. Now your trying to act like your doing us a favor for delivering on both models? Sure, you could've stopped at the B and that's called fraud. The Hornet was sold and advertised as a single aircraft, not sure how that is relevant. I don't even know why this is a debate, you advertised the product, you set the price point, sold the product and collect profit from said product. Now that folks ask questions about the product to confirm they are getting what they purchased, you get triggered? Obviously we appreciate the missions, AI A-6 and forrestal when they finally come, this doesn't mean we don't actually want the products we actually put money down for. Hope that makes sense.

I'm sorry, say again? It sounds like we're getting an "A-ish" model, not an A. Why aren't glove vanes being implemented? We've all been waiting this long, might as well release an actual A model when its ready instead of a B with TF30s ....

I get English is not your first language. But you literally said other games don't fix issues faster than ED. Those are your words. This is blatantly false as I referred to several examples. Does this make sense now?

The stable may not have as many bugs but there are still several including with modules like the F-5 that have been reported for years yet they are still left unresolved. This is a fact whether you agree or not. If your post doesn't get deleted since you specifically name other games...I'll honestly be shocked since ED doesn't exercise any kind of tolerance in that department... BUT, I will say another air combat sim that happens to also be based in Russia squashes verified bugs in literal hours with multiple hotfixes after reaching out to their customers for feedback as needed on a consistent basis. Also, several other "Early Access" games (think some pretty popular modern tactical FPS and WWII FPS titles) with much smaller teams than ED are also able to squash pretty complicated bugs within a couple weeks (if not days) time frame. You stating no one is fixing bugs quicker than ED is just patently false. I get wanting to defend ED but you need to at least use some factual information. ED and ED alone have created this situation they find themselves in. Until they are ready to take actual responsibility for that and make consistent positive changes... things are only gonna get worse. I doubt Magz and Jabbers will be the last content creators to speak out.

Three patently false statements. Do you actually use any other sim or game software besides DCS, it doesn't seem like it if you making blatantly false statements like this, especially that last one...like seriously man. :no_sad:

Then it's probably a good idea for ED to set the example and stop using Open Beta as the main version of the game. ED advertises release dates based on their release to open beta, not the stable. Thanks.

DCS "Frakenhornet"

Never trust a single thing ED says when it comes to timelines and you'll never be disappointed. :thumbup:

None of those features are coming tomorrow, if there is even a patch tomorrow. Kate just posted an update and literally nothing she mentioned back in April is ready yet. Now estimating those for a "June patch" :lol: ....

Have to agree 1000% This saving info until the last possible second has gotten old. These features were supposed to come in APRIL. We're almost in June at this point and for some reason ED still thinks its a good idea to play mum with supposedly less than 48hrs from said patch that is supposed to have these features. They are either going to be in the patch or not. This 11th hour nonsense needs to stop.

+1 and to the cat's as well?

pudknocker and the GR's will be on their channels, "THIS IS THE BEST THING EVAR!!!!" :lol: per usual Hopefully some more balanced folks like Jabbers and Magz haven't been ousted out of the "inner circle" and will be able to provide some honest feedback on this thing while the rest of us continue to wait....

Not a peep from ED...

Still waiting for someone from ED to confirm exactly what the features are for these two as well?