diogofalcao

Do you have a second HDD? You could move these folders to another drive and create a hard link.

Download it here: https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/releases IMO this is the best dynamic campaign ever.

How much do you charge to make one?

Really??? What's the difficult of creating a female model and skin tones? Honestly, I am a black rich person. I don't care to pay extra for the product as long as I am represented.

Of course I am, there are pilots in every single country in the world. Why only White and Russian Pilots represented?

I am sorry but your comment doesn't add nothing to the discussion I see hundreds of posts asking for 1% performance match up. Why can't we ask for a simple 3d model and several skin tones? Is that too much? Really???? Just check the first page of each planes forum and you will see. Something is wrong here. I see lots of you supporting those requests. Maybe some of you are racists?

I don't have the time to learn how to create skins. Maybe you are a teenager, I have a family and my own company to take care. WE are asking ED to do it. Period. We WILL ask for it because we PAID for this product.

If the subject hurts you that much, why don't you just ignore it and live your life? Just step away! Do you feel threatened about people asking for a simple 3D model coloring and female model? Leave this post for the ones who cares, like me. I see several posts asking for such tiny details like 1% of performance difference, or same old crap posts (BF109 takeoff is not realistic) that it's interesting for maybe 1 our 2 people. Why cant' we ask for some 3D models representing each race and gender? Go back to 1950 then. This is 2020 and people like to be represented. Why are all the pilots white males and not black or asian males? Why are they white ppl all the time? Why not all females? For the people asking for mustaches, that's ok, you have the right to ask for it. Get this chance to also ask for a pocket saw, a checkered t-shirt and a pit smoker. I agree that this is not a Role Playing Game but Im sure 3d artists can adapt the models in like a week. Just like they change the color of the landing gear because of that photo from wikipedia. I've spend thousands of dollars maybe just on this simulator, I support the developers by having every single module ever created. I can request a black model, american latin model, asian, female, whatever.

I am pretty sure Khopa (actual campaign developer) said he would be on trip without internet access. Maybe when he comes back we can ask for a proper Topic as both versions deserves own discussion. Guess this would help a lot of people with proper info and some ppl don't even know there is a new version out there.

It's a new version from another guy, AI didn't change ofc but there a lot of new features.

Terminology is based on real aircraft. Best way to do it is hover the mouse on what you want mapped and it will show you the command.

https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/ IMO, is the best dynamic campaign you can get.

Congrats on the release!!

Search for Hard Symbolics Links, I use it on several modules. It works pretty well even when updating because its created on OS level.

This youtube channel has some good tutorials, even though some of them are for the other sim, the technique can be applied to DCS.

Thanks Khopa, This Campaign is simply incredible and improving each version. I will let you know if any issues comes up. Congrats!!! Edited: Not sure if this is an issue, still under construction or I don't know how to do it, but no mission is showing Gen.CAS nor Gen.SEAD/DEAD under Flight Planer - dropbox with waypoints. Running BLUEFOR, Allied 1944 vs Axis 1944 Channel Map Thx Edit 2: While I was trying to start campaign it returns an error informing that the mission is trying to use radio 251 Mhz on P47 for example (it's range does not go until 251, its much shorter) I can investigate the ranges if you need.

I forced physx to cpu (nvidia control panel) and now I get less stutters, not sure if it's just my system but it's so smooth now (could be placebo effect and I don't even know if DCS uses physx), but someone else could try and tell us.

Yeah, it's sad cuz those of us who can live with some bugs and prefer the new stuff coming out fast will have to wait for the new toys.

Agreed, the sim is getting bigger and bigger so we need ED to focus on core features before anything else. I wouldn't mind paying 50 bucks for DCS 3.0. We all know that every company needs money and maybe that's why they are focusing on new modules so much. My vote is to charge for DCS 3.0 but that's number 1 priority.

Some people do positive marketing, I prefer this band wagon. I am very satisfied with all my purchases. These guys (ED) has expertise on the subject, more than a decade doing flight simulation I would say they do it pretty good. Errors will happen, it's a constant development. I am sure it's expensive to develop all these modules, so if you want the company to improve of course you have to be vocal, people who love will also criticize and that's part of the business. Tell what you think, companies will try to have your trust and then you buy the modules if they are good. I am honestly very satisfied with the investment on my hobby, it gives me thousands of fun time per module (no other game can provide you that). Of course they need to improve, business is a constant growth or else you die, they will always need to improve, perfect companies do not exist. What I request is just much, much more transparenc. Do news videos on youtube telling about development, people like it, tell them the challenges. Be honest with what when wrong and why, people will trust you more like that. Show us all the research needed, people will see why some things takes longer. You can give ETAs, just inform em in advance it's not happening when things go wrong, it's ok. You also need to have more restrict partnerships, some of third parties takes long time to fix things. Do contracts with SLAs, we accept things going wrong but taking months to fix bugs customers will not be happy. You are on market for more than a decade, overall the player base trust ED, including me. And that's why we will always criticize and wait for a feedback on the investment. We do it because we care. I honestly really, really like Bohemia's Interactive business model, they used to be a small company back in the days. Arma 3 IMO is still very modern and with ongoing support, they create DLC's and also offer the mods (with SDK) possibility. There are many many aircrafts in the history, I am sure ED will always have planes to create. Or maybe they could also focus on some of the core features missing. Like Vulkan, combat scenario, ATC, sell them as DLC's, np about that.

Watch this video to understand why the modules cost that much and why they take long to be completed.

1st day purchase!

Great manual! Thanks for sharing.

Open beta I am sure stable build is working just fine, maybe ED should just get rid of open beta. Shit is ruining their image because ppl seems to refuse the difference between stable and beta. Someone will come and say that stable has bugs too, then you see Windows with first version launched in 1985 still has several problems. God damn, I saw AIX bugs a lot of times. I've seen Linux bugs, Java and high-end equipments that costs millions of dollars simply freezing. Don't come and say that because of agile mindset, or extensive tests bugs will stop, they will EVER exist. Softwares are written by people and even the automatization of bug testing are written by people. We are not talking about a software for local market, this shit probably has millions and millions of code lines and we are talking about aerodynamics, complex math not a bunch of IFs, ELSEs.