Jump to content

WolfHound009

Members
  • Posts

    105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About WolfHound009

  • Birthday 01/03/1997

Personal Information

  • Location
    Classified
  • Interests
    Cold War Military Aviation
  • Occupation
    Student

Recent Profile Visitors

1638 profile views
  1. Early 70s F-14s had that chin pod right? It looked a bit like a TCS but i'm not sure.
  2. As far as TCS options go, I am hoping that there will be some way to simulate an early USN -A and by early I mean with the ALQ-100 pod slick, no TCS, no Bullet fairing. I know In theory that the -95GR (IIRAF) That HB is working on could be used for this and this comes with its own set of compromises in terms of simulating a early USN -A. The fuel tanks won't be usable and theres no ACLS. However these are minor points (I dont mean to sound ungrateful). i originally thought that it may have been better to have a USN 95-GR that has the options to remove fuel tank pylons and disable ACLS? Cos then within that, Iranian and USN -95GRs could be simulated. However, what I have just said comes with its own set of issues as this USN -95GR would leave the REDFOR without an F-14. Maybe, a compromise could be to allow the -135-GR (Early) to have a TCS option/feature where it would be possible to only have the ALQ-100 sensor mounted to the nose without the actual TCS/Bullet fairing, this way the simulation of an 'Early (1970s)' USN -A becomes possible.
  3. what will be the difference between the Early -135 and the -95 ?
  4. Will the -95GR be US and Iranian or soley Iranian?
  5. How did these early IRSTs work? Like was it an IR TV image or something? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  6. [emoji120][emoji120][emoji120] ROLLS ROYCE SPEYS!!!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  7. I don’t think so I think it was just the E that had the internal Vulcan. I think Naval Phantoms carried a gun pod. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. I’m curious weather the Naval Variant from HB will be the Bravo or the Juliet Phantom ? What are the differences between the two ? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. Cool [emoji41] So like the F-14A -135GR And F-14B is like the cake. The USN -95GR is the icing and the IIRAF -95GR is the cherry. The Forrestal is the plate. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. Is the -95GR going to be IIRAF and USN ? Or exclusively IIRAF? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  11. Ya early IRST, I read that Grumman tried to sell the Iranians the ALR-23 IRST but it was lowkey kinda trash so they decided to not buy it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. RIP [emoji3590] Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  13. OH. MY. GOSSSHHHH. U absolute legends. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...