WildBillKelsoe

oh. I just connect the wires? cool!

Oh yes I think I am not even close to finishing the sketch.. Will do. Thanks

I know the A variant is the older one hence its called Rook/Grach in Russian. Speaking of which, this forum I hear is dedicated to the free T not the FC3 one, even though it is in an FC3 sub-forum. Go figure..

I doubt you'll find road footage of it

the A is called Grach/Rook the T is called the Frogfoot/T-Toad this looks like a Rook.

lol if it did I am quitting DCS for good...

wait so you want to also use it roadside? good luck with that.

I wish.. its not commercially available where I am. That said, thanks for your input. I am using this board based of ATMega32U4. As I understand it, this is compatible with MMJOY?

Nice to see you bud! OK after testing the CCRP training mission I think I know where the problem is: The stores management system. You see if you are carrying anything BUT KMGU dispensers, the dial should be set to KMGU. All FAB/KAB/SAB/RBK, etc.. will drop CCIP unless it is set to (KMGU/MBD/..) AND if you are carrying KMGU the dial should be set to Salvo/0.1~0.4 AND NOT KMGU (go figure..) or It will drop CCIP. The tutorial is irrelevant in the speeds and altitudes unless the SMS is fixed. So yes it's a bug but looks simple to plug the munitions to the correct setting kind of bug. Also, the referencing altimeter for the CCIP/RP is apparently the radar altimeter.

Hey bro, there is a windows app if you can sport an additional monitor as the extended display. It's called helios. Might be worth a shot.

@IronhandIs this Rich Sorochak?? Is this THE Rich Sorochak on the line?? The guy that hooked me into this thing 10+ years ago?? Nice to see you buddy! @Jascha I just booted up the CCRP training mission like you said. I am still investigating the issue. I will update on my next reply. Thanks

maybe in the T variant we are talking about the A variant I think for CCRP to work the plane must have a (somewhat) stabilized form of gyro/servo/dampening/actuator mechanism (AKA autopilot). I will look for the number 5 mission though. I highly doubt now that the A variant is as sophisticated as the T at least in FCS. I think the A variant was the prototype variant iirc and that was merely a steam gauge manual flying plane. Think Bf-109. Cables and pulleys.

I don't think the A variant is equipped with CCRP capability (I checked the control bindings for CCRP steering mode (A-10A has it).. maybe it is related to munitions?

I wouldn't think it would matter because of the AoA vs speed curve wouldn't allow it to STO because of its a weak engine (its the non after burning variant of the Mig-21/Su-15 engine)

Hi, I bought the components and stuck them together. I would like someone with arduino sketch knowledge to help me finish this thing.

Well that too.. but I guess people would like it more than others and cut their sales. Its a double edged sword

A friend of mine in the Russian Airforce (boom!) told me that the Su-25A has an independent flight control channel they use to disconnect the rudder from the nose gear when they do the wipe before taxiing I wonder why Eagle Dynamics in all their might didn't add such an important basic realistic feature to the plane that has an advanced flight model.

it is not possible at this time. the only solution is to run the track, change the head motions/takes as desired, then save the new track.

Well nothing superseded the old Mk.1 eyeballs since the dawn of time. At least I am led to believe this by living.

to answer your question which I struggled with long ago, the answer is yes! here is why I think yes is the right answer: 1- personal reasons: I used to wear eyeglasses. nearsighted to 2016. got LASIC done. now I still need to kneel in to read small text, or lift up textbook closer to read the fine print. This is human limitation. 2- game related reasons: our equipment can NEVER match the acuity of the real eyesight. this means if you can not spot the thing from afar, you dont fly. my point is, as long as you can pick things up using any means necessary, you are not considered cheating. you are considered relieving your eye strain. just like in the real world. I hope this makes sense.

Ah yes it is this behaviour thanks!

I am bidding on the version we are getting its probably the 1967 version used in NAM. I wouldn't expect glass cockpit display or digital instruments... I would expect A LOT of round dial instruments..