Tucano_uy

Good. We can do it now.

Somehow the beta-stable duality seems really complicated to some people, most of which probably do not participate in this forum. One out of 2 messages in the last couple of days in some FB groups were about how to install the beta version or “why is DCS not updating to 2.7”

There’s clearly, for whatever reason, no willingness to fix this issue.

Disappointed but expected. Too easy to find the needle in the haystack.

Good it worked. Inside that DCS folder are your setting files. Probably in the future you’ll not want to delete everything as you’ll lose all you config files (key binds, graphics settings, etc) and then my suggestion above might s problem I believe it has something to do with full screen/windowed mode. Are you running a single screen?

It happened to me a lot and read of many people with this issue. I seemed to have it fixed by opening the graphics config file in notepad++ and changed the value of full screen from true to false. It was a long shot and it seems it worked. I am not on my machine now to see the files and be more precise. Or you can try to rename/move/delete your graphic settings file and have it regenerated. When it happened I could hear the music in the background and the interface and menus are actually active. Many times I was able to guess/calculate where the “exit” button was and be able to click and close the game. I hope it helps

Nice, thanks.

Can’t the visibility issue be dealt with transparency? I mean, to adjust the transparency of the drawn vehicle depending of the distance from the point of view. Just found this video interesting , where did the SU27 go at 0:40?

So many electrons bothered for nothing...

it's called dying.

Just for the "sport" of arguing, some people will twist what the others write so to fuel this absolute ridiculous discussion. From the second post, the original and very simple idea was distorted. This thread was not worth 3 posts, and look what it grew to... ridiculous. So blinded by their own concepts that cannot understand that others might have a different vision. So stupid, that "fun" is almost a sin. As if fun was opposed to realism. What do you play DCS for if it's not fun?

:megalol::lol::megalol::lol: 40 posts and almost 1100 views. :doh::doh::doh::doh::doh: I'm dying :megalol::megalol: :cheer3nc:

Seriously... :doh: I don't argue for the sake of arguing. Have a good one!!

Sigh.... I never spoke about a fantasy facility. Sorry if my "fake" apron statement in the OP gave you that impression. Try please to be a bit wide minded, for a second. THERE IS A FRIKKEN AERODROME IN GAME, ALREADY DONE, ED ALREADY WENT INTO TROUBLE TO PUT IT THERE (TO WHICH I AM ENORMOUSLY GRATEFUL, SO MUCH, I WANT TO USE IT), ON WHERE NO AIRPLANE CAN BE PLACED IF IS NOT WITH THE ENGINE RUNNING AND ON THE RUNWAY. I DON'T WANT AN APRON. I DON'T WANT A PATCH OF TARMAC, I WANT A DEFINED, DIGITAL, INVISIBLE, UNOBTRUSIVE PLACE WHERE I CAN ADD A COLD AIRCRAFT IN THE MISSION EDITOR, START IT, GET TO THE RWY AND FLY AWAY. Where is the violation to realism there? What do you think happens to acft after landing and before departing on those runways? Seriously, this took a looooooot more time than it deserves. Got boring already.