Hulkbust44

Yep that's it, FCS takes care of it, in non ACM flight you'd only use the pedals if you wanted an intentional yaw. Sweeping strafe for example. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Okay, so this behavior is what I would expect if the FCS was deflecting surfaces to compensate, watching the FCS format, it is not. Not at all. The rudders are the only surfaces moving. 260 knots and below (until you get to AoA scheduling) it rolls in the direction of the pedals. Somewhere between 260/270 KIAS it does switch, the aircraft rolls away from the pedal input. The airspeed distinction was missing from the OP, this is peculiar. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Not a track, but a higher speed that's basically what it's doing. F-16 is a completely different system. No where near the same rudder logic. (The thing gives up past some 22 alpha) Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Yeah, because nothing has the fly by wire to the degree that the Hornet does. Certainly not with the yaw logic. Aerodynamically, what does kicking the rudder do? You're yawing the nose and pushing one wing out in front of the other, and the inboard wing will have it's airflow blanked. This causes the outer wing to create more lift inducing a roll. Opposite aileron will of course counteract that, and that's what the FCS is doing as it's logic is to execute a level yaw. This makes it very good for spread out suppressive fire on gun runs. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Sounds correct to me. The pedals in the Hornet are a yaw command. Push the right pedal, nose yaws to the right, to keep the track the FCS compensates by rolling the opposite direction. Take a mustang, give it a good boot of rudder and see how you need to move the stick to keep her straight. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Absolutely not. Most people have never even heard of the ED documentation. It should be there to detail everything about the module as manual, not a pick-up and go guide. 3rd parties already do the latter. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

1500 is probably what's needed, the NATOPS of mostly non combat systems is some 900 pages. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

No, it is absolutely not a separate system. The TACAN functionality in the Hornet is run off the MIDSL LVT, it is in fact the same system. When it's powered, you will get some MIDS functions as well. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Nope, completely unimplemented past the visuals. Just like MIDS and most of TGT DATA. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Correct, it dosen't. Expect for SCENE and AUTO track if a moving target. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Though in SCENE, it will continuously update. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

SCS to the radar commands AACQ/FACQ If the TDC isn't over something else, then the L+S will be the STT target. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

So why do you think you'd want a compressor stall? Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Not really a thing on these modern engines, the only time it's even mentioned in the aircraft manual is in relation to ingestion of ice. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Are you in SPOT? Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk