Hunt3r.j2

Erm, MPAT doesn't have the penetration to take out tanks...

Is there a mode like this in DCS: Black Shark that would allow us to basically just fly around with no objectives to be completed?

Well, I think the greater issue is that ATI and Nvidia haven't even standardized their GPU computer architecture. ATI is backing OpenCL, and Nvida backs CUDA.

Ageia PhysX was acquired by Nvidia, and they use the API to drive some physics on their GPUs. It's not really designed for the type of physics that flight sims would use.

I've been pondering this for a while now, but would this be possible? From what I've seen, it's possible for GPUs to use APIs like PhysX to do calculations that would otherwise be saddled on the CPU. So would it be possible for GPUs to take some of the load off of CPUs?

Even getting the data on a gen 4.5 fighter could be rather... iffy.

Doesn't Fanatec have FFB pedals?

It would basically require huge amounts of very very good LODs, I mean for everything. Or DX11 to go from flight sim levels of detail to quickly tessellate to FPS levels of detail.

The sea men are in with the women.

So wouldn't it make sense to lock onto tanks, so you could fire it off without worrying about keeping it steady, and instead, scanning around?

I'm wondering if anyone knows how the AH-64A designates a target from itself. No, I'm not asking how the Hellfire finds the way, I'm asking how the AH-64A CP/G can lock up, say, tanks, or just a patch of ground.

Are you sure that it isn't the joystick having problems with the sensors?

I say it'll be the F-86 Sabre.

Ka-52 is classified heavily. So no.

DCS: SU-25 would be a nice. Package the SU-25A and SU-25TM in one, no more arguments!

:music_whistling:

I was referring to the A-10 flying low enough that just a normal Mk82 would be fine. Anyhow, with danger-close, cannon and accurate rocket fire is good enough, no?

When it comes to unguided bombs, you can get them accurate enough, mostly because there is a launch cue.

AFAIK A-10s are not usually equipped with smart bombs because dumb bombs are in general, good enough to do the job.

Well their G series mouses and keyboards are good. I've had a G15 for a good 3 years and nothing bad has happened. I did have a G5 break on me, but that was because I bent the wire and eventually it went dead. I did have an MX Revolution die, but the battery died, which is normal.

I really don't see much point in having a perfectly exact A-10C stick replica, mostly because we aren't just going to use it for a single sim and not any other.

Aircraft in general do NOT enjoy low g.

Sensors are different, so the model wouldn't be very accurate.

I'd like to try out the Sharkpit 2.0, but preferably without dust and scratches.

So I wasn't the only one that noticed it.:lol: Anyhow, your best bet is to hover out of range of the target, not much else to do.