On the (off)topic, I was here just reading because of my lack of knowledge about real fighter aircraft procedures does not help at all to the debate. But... there is an interesting underlining theme here on wich I felt motivated to post something.
I learned from a colleague, when attending at masters' degree, how to act with a brutal intellectual honesty when arguing: he deepened his topic of study in his thesis and, from that moment on, he started to try to invalidate and search for flaws in his own argument. He called me and other colleagues in a very humble way to try to find logical or conceptual mistakes. His central thesis was very good and was published with improvements based on his and our criticism. Personally, it was a great lesson on how to take the scientific process and the construction of knowledge seriously. In other words, if you get passionate on your arguments and try to defend it at any cost (like everyone else normally does), you wouldn't be able to see other aspects and learn even more.
I would like to give some references for the matter of logics and fallacies (this sneaky bastards are everywhere):
- The Fallacy Detective: Thirty-Eight Lessons on How to Recognize Bad Reasoning
(This is basically a response to the classic book of Schoppenhauer on how to win an debate without having reason, wich is a worty reading too)
- The Art of Reasoning: An Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking
- Mastering Logical Fallacies: The Definitive Guide to Flawless Rhetoric and Bulletproof Logic
- There are great courses for free on youtube and podcasts in several languages, too. I suggest those made by philosophers and respected academics (argumentum ad verecundiam on my suggestion, ok, but these guys have greater probability to be teaching the right stuff).
And before I close my (off)topic comment, I can share a tiramisu or a very nice carrot cake recipe if anyone woud like to try. Carrots' quality control not included.
[Now... back on topic]