Dr_Arrow

Well I just hope that DoctorK will create a new RamGEN for FC 2.0. Because generally the whole lockon series is lacking good campaigns. Where you can download hundreds of campaigns for Il2 - for LOMAC there are maybe some tens campaigns and only a few of them are really worth it. With FC 2.0 and triggers and other randomization factors even the current RamGEN missions would be a blast to fly.

AFAIK - vanila Su-25 has the advanced flight model similar to Su-25TM.

Fantastic, DoctorK! :thumbup::thumbup: Thank you very much, do you plan also some functional updates?

I think you have to have LOMAC installed in the default directory in program files folder. I am also not able to use my pilot in RAMGEN as I don't install games in my program files and I just enter mission debriefs manually into the program and use ramgen just for mission generation. I think we have to live with it until someone makes a new version with the possibility to select directory where LOMAC is installed.

any news here??, I love RAMGEN - it creates very good missions - often much better than the user created ones.

However, that chart doesn't say anything about weights of both aircraft. Are their weights the same or are both planes fully fueled?

Thank you very much for your work, unfortunately there are not many user created campaigns for LOMAC (compared to say Il2). Don't worry about some mildness - I prefer missions with realistic difficulty, where I can survive as I play DiD style. I just wonder how people can like difficult missions where you have to die 3 times first to figure out the only "right" approach for the mission. With Su-25/T I prefer to apply realworld tactics, the basic rules are if there are fighters - bug out, if painted by medium/long range SAM - bug out (unless you are on SEAD), try to take out ground targets from safe distance out of their engagement zone.

Well, I would recommend to read this article for many posters in this thread to understand the basic concepts of autopilots and how it works in Ka-50: http://www.simhq.com/_air13/air_429a.html

Thank you very much for the pointers. I know jpm's campaigns - but to be honest, while there are many missions - briefings, situational reports, etc. are rather rudimentary and not to par with Red Hammer, which is campaign with well thought and achievable mission goals with nice situational reports. Jpm's campaigns are fine in quantity but the ones I tried had non-existent briefings or just few words like, destroy this or this, but there is a lot of them so some may like it. I play lockon in DiD style, so I need to have good situational report of situation in campaign briefing to be able to create a well thought plan to survive in plain Su-25 :). It is also more immersive:) The ones on lockonfiles look nice though, I'm gonna try them.

Thanks for answer, I'll do it this way. Aside this glitch, it is a superb campaign. It's a pitty that there aren't many that good campaigns for the plain Su-25.

I know this is pretty much outdated - but I was very upset when after one hour of flying in the attack railyard mission I was just coming for landing and my plane has just disappeared :( Now I know it was probably because of Il-76 landing. Without mission success - the mission wasn't even logged in my log, so that's not too much encouraging.

Thanks for answers, I'll stick with T-frog then. With lower loads and keeping the speed up it sure can pack a good punch:)

Maybe a dumb question - but what is C/pi ?

I've read older topics about making Su-25TM flyable. It's been said by Alfa that there is no point in doing this, because players cannot use ground radar with SU-25TM as it is not modeled in the sim. However perfomance wise - SU-25TM is lighter by 1 ton than the plain SU-25T, which makes it reasonable to use as it could make a difference. Is this modeled when using SU-25TM as player flyable aircraft? Thank you for any answers.