Jump to content

MrExplosion

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    342

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by MrExplosion

  1. MrExplosion
    Allied Propaganda confirmed.
  2. MrExplosion
    It's not that easy by far. 150 Octane wasn't used as widely as you think.
  3. MrExplosion
    Thank you for summarizing the current status quo. Great job! As long as there are no known cheats that evil minded users could employ to take advantage of gunsight mods being excluded from IC I am all for trying this!
  4. MrExplosion
    Pls also check for the Anton. It's broken there as well, even tho I dont have a track rn. Thx
  5. MrExplosion
    Yes, I just wonder if damage dealt is realistically modelled. Germans kept that ammo throughout the war, so if ballistics was bad they probably had other reasons to use it.
  6. MrExplosion
    You can check page 8 and following to get detailed measurements of velocity / kinetic energy at different distances and compare that to the in game results. Handbuch der Flugzeug Bordwaffenmunition 1936-1945.pdf
  7. MrExplosion
    Yes, on Saturdays every 2 weeks usually. Join the discord to keep updated.
  8. MrExplosion
    You don't even realize it is totally necessary to "block this behind IC"? Spotting is a skill. Trying to level the ground for all resolutions is a good thing per se, but this script just takes all the skill out of it.
  9. MrExplosion
    Tested this yesterday on VR with my G2 headset. Imo it looks terrible - contacts render as giant bricks and will stay bricks until really close, making it impossible to ID. Also take all the skill out of spotting. Pls add this to IC asap.
  10. MrExplosion
    Why would you make the FuG16 optional? What would it have instead?
  11. MrExplosion
  12. MrExplosion
    Stunning work mate! Can't wait to use it
  13. MrExplosion
    Sorry, misunderstood your initial question. Main difference between mV and Vz: mV is designed to detonate the bomb really shortly after impact - basically while it is still in motion (up to 0.5 seconds of delay) and Vz is used for a longer delay of 20 seconds or longer. These are the basic definitions. I am not familiar with all the details involved tho. If you want to know more you can read the original documentation here: http://michaelhiske.de/Wehrmacht/Luft/Luft/LDV_4200/SERIE_1/Blatt_04_1943.HTM
  14. MrExplosion
    In general you would use m.V. setting whenever you dont want the bomb to detonate directly upon impact but a little bit later. For example a SC 50 with Zünder 15 in m.V. would detonate 0,05 seconds after impact on a 4-story building making it detonate in the basement rendering the whole building unusable.
  15. MrExplosion
    Thanks for providing this. I hope Ugra will put in the necessary changes to correctly model Luftwaffe airfield lightings. The document you provided updated Sicherheitsbefehl Nr. 10 from January '42 and was then further updated in Taktischer Einzelhinweis Nr. 17 in May '44. I provided the Sicherheitsbefehl Nr. 10 for download here and will also be able to provide Taktischer Einzelhinweis Nr. 17 by the end of the month. It would be great if Ugra could provide a means for mission devs to turn the lights on or off via scripting. So @MAESTR0pls get in touch so we can get night lighting in correctly. I would greatly appreciate. SicherheitsbefehlNr10.pdf
  16. MrExplosion
  17. MrExplosion
    Do you have a contact who I can message daily to get some priority onto these plans?
  18. MrExplosion
    Nice skins! Hope someone from ED reads this and makes this happen
  19. MrExplosion
    What about runway lighting?
  20. MrExplosion
    Lights in the hangars but not on the runways?
  21. MrExplosion
    Imo it would be okay-ish to do one airfield properly with beacons, lighting, etc so it's at least possible to do bad weather / night fighter missions.
  22. MrExplosion
    The problem is we won't be getting those beacons from ED in like forever and it only takes a few minutes to put them into the map for the airfields that realistically had this equipment. If we miss the chance now it will never be done.
  23. MrExplosion
    Yea I know and like that channel. The exact device presented in the video FuBl 2 F was used in single engine aircraft that were fitted for night / bad weather ops. I didn't know about the NDB capabilities of the Fug16ZY and always thought it was badly modeled in that other sim but you learn something every day.
  24. MrExplosion
    That's simply not correct. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenz_beam and the AFN-2 is the display device for navigating on that beam and not for NDBs. In depth info: https://www.cdvandt.org/fubl-ebl-project.htm and https://www.booklooker.de/Bücher/Angebote/titel=Die+deutschen+Funk-Navigations-+und+Funk-Führungsverfahren+bis+1945 TACAN development started in the late 1950s.
  25. MrExplosion
    By that logic it will not be possible to have realistic night fighter ops in multiplayer for the foreseeable future. Given that the Lancaster is being made I find that quite disappointing. If the map is based on the time period you mentioned there is no Luftwaffe base on the whole map lol. Don't you find that ridiculous?
×
×
  • Create New...