pingo

Ok. First the K4 mission and now a D9 mission. Rep inbound to you +1 Good missions. Thank You very much.

Nice :thumbup:

Start menue - programs - Eagle Dynamics (folder) - DCS World (folder) right click "Repair DCS World" and run it as Admin.

Well check this site: https://mega.co.nz/#F!KJ5X1CgQ!E5bpiw4KSd8jCy3SZ9RS7Q There are a few for the k4 think you would find the bf109k4_handbuck.pdf interesting it`s 26.8MB

Sorry to hear about your problem. I just started up the 190 campaign and briefing is there - it starts normal as it should. Have you tried the repair funktion in DCS World?

MP Video please :)

That`s why the Dora is the last one i bought - eighter they fix the stang or I can find another sim or game to put my money on and some have fun with (for now my wallet is closed) .:D

The historical correct 72-75"MP booster P-51 you mean? Dont know lets wait and se.

In real life pilots on both sides had to fight psychological barriers during WW2 - it was not uncommon to call in an engine or radio problem and ask for RTB. During the BOB campaign german pilots often fought against the so called "kanal krankheit" or channel disease in english - just the thought of ending up in the canal caused by battle damage, engine problems or out of fuel was quite scary for many of those pilots. I can certainly endorse the view that it shouldn`t matter what games or sims idividuals have played - all input is important and should not be classified on game history. All should be able to play how they want to play - after all no one coming from the civilized world would like to dictate to anyone on how to play a game or sim - sure enough the blue skies of the virtuel world can be very frustrating at times.

And one more from a band from my beloved country :)

How about at trip back in time when I was a youngster :D

I dont know Furious if we will ever se an option for 75 boost in the game only ED knows. What I feel though is this community should not have any problems agreeing on an options for 75 boots. It saddens me what I se on this very forum the cheap tricks used. I will newer forget those nights i climbed into my 109E3 cockpit jumped onto TS during the 100% oct debate and discover alot of those people, who posted that they did not have any problems df the 109 and at the same time question the correct historical aspect of it all didn`t fly the spit or hurri, they were 109 pilots - that rocked my boat. Fool me once I can accept that. The 2nd time I will be more on my alert. 3rd time there is just one to blame and that`s my self. I dont want to se the same happen here. I want the community to grov - more WW2 servers and online pilots. Im not angry Im disappointed by the comment i se from some members and will classify it as absolutely rubbish because it has nothing to do with historical correctness.

How about you put some proove to the table, now! Dude. "After several hours", :megalol: How many hours are you talking about? Ace :P Jesus crist were have the world gone.

This story repeats it self again. Last time it was about 100% oct fuel for the spit and hurri in cliffs. Not to forget all the " learn to fly", "it cant be that hard" or the best of them all "hey I have no problems against the 109 in both the spit or hurri". And then in the evening jumping into the cockpit of my bf109E3 and fly together these very same 109 pilots, who didn`t have any problems against the 109. Jesus crist you will kill the WW2 multiplayer community and the servers with your unhistorical support.

I'm probably not quite off the track when I put forward a request for 72-75 inch P-51 model (the later model). I have a strong feeling that P-51 pilots will see it as true historically, as it were.