SUBS17
-
Posts
4653 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by SUBS17
-
-
6 hours ago, BIGNEWY said:
please bare this in mind in the future, rules can be found at the top of the forum
1.14 It's forbidden to create threads/topics containing in their title/body:
- hyperbolic, rude or strong language, also partially or completely masked by other symbols like @#$%^, etc;
- no relation to forum section (flame);
- no relation to the topic (off-topic);
- please avoid low-effort posts like "+1", "me too", and similar (flood);
- same information covered in other sections/threads/posts (cross-posting);
- over 70% of capital letters for except for abbreviations;
- non-informative content/titles like: "Help me!", "I have a question...", "rant", "I don't know what to do", "+=Super Pack=+" or meaningless set of symbols and letters.thank you
Some words are Titles and they are in CAPITALS. You will find that there are other cultures that use CAPITALS only. It is strictly Human Kind that use lower case. All of the others use Capitals only. And you are not an English Teacher and these are words used in CODING and they are Titles to equipment that is for that purpose. With equipment that is military it is often that they are written in Capitals. FLY BY WIRE, HIGHLY ACCURATE NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AUTO-TORQUE CONTROL and AUTO-PILOT/AUTO-CRUISE, AUTO-TRANSITION, AUTO-HOVER, AUTO-LAND, AUTO-TAKE OFF and a SLING LOAD COMPENSATOR - These words are Titles to PATENTS and that is why it is written that way. Later when Human Kind visits other Worlds you may find that they use Capitals only but also use English.
-
4 hours ago, Dragon1-1 said:
It's neat, but autopilots for helos existed for a while. This is basically letting autopilot do all the work and controlling it from outside the cockpit, I believe the manned Blackhawk already had it in all 3 axes. Not as revolutionary as it might seem.
What is really neat is that it was applied to a helo that's already in widespread use.
This one looks fully Autonomous which is very good for Aerospace Travel.
-
12 hours ago, sirrah said:
@SUBS17; Something really strange going on with your keyboard there mate
Some WORDS in your SENTENCES randomly seem TO APPEAR in caps lock
That is deliberate.
-
2 hours ago, sirrah said:
What nobody knows, is that there's actually a tiny gnome behind the controls
But seriously, that is impressive
It has FLY BY WIRE, HIGHLY ACCURATE NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AUTO-TORQUE CONTROL and AUTO-PILOT/AUTO-CRUISE, AUTO-TRANSITION, AUTO-HOVER, AUTO-LAND, AUTO-TAKE OFF and a SLING LOAD COMPENSATOR. It is very good CODING to make a helicopter be capable of flying AUTONOMOUSLY especially with a sling load.
-
-
9 hours ago, ngreenaway said:
not the one we have in DCS. what we have in-sim is modelled before the pac3 rollout. the AESA version is relatively new to the force
The S300 is literally the same they are both very good SAM's.
-
Patriot Radar on the missile and many SAM and AAM Missiles have AESA Radar.
-
15 hours ago, Dragon1-1 said:
It would be strange to classify the Su-25 while allowing you to make the Hind, seeing as the only major system it has over it is the Klen-PS and maybe the INS (which, as in most Russian aircraft of the time, has very little input from the pilot). Then again, government don't always make sense.
Their Navigation is primarily GPS not INS. They could make a full Modelled SU25 or SU27 there is enough information I think for them to model them.
-
10 hours ago, Dragon1-1 said:
It's not his only delusion, sadly. He's convinced that technology is far more advanced than it actually is. Su-25 in particular is a rather simple aircraft, even in its latest version. I think it has a radar altimeter, but not any sort of GPWS.
Delusion sadly, right and you know so much do you not? Ejection Seats all have GPS for ORIENTATION particularly in the event of an INVERTED EJECTION. The Mig29 has such features so of course so would other aircraft like the SU25. Watch videos of Mig29's and SU27 Ejections and you'll see the seat in some of them fire and ORIENTATE prior to the chute being fired.
-
11 hours ago, baron fon dron said:
The su 25 does not have a collision detection system.
In the video, the pilot pulled the handles of the ejection seat.I did not see him or her pull a handle as mentioned it appears to be AUTO-EJECT. The EJECTION SEAT has a sensor which detects collision or the moment before a collision. Russian aircraft have very good EJECTION SEATS they also feature something that is used for Navigation which the aircraft use. I think the SU25 in that video may have an equivalent of an ACES III.
-
1 hour ago, baron fon dron said:
Su-25 has a manual ejection seat.
Seats with automatic actuation of extraction for a dangerous roll and height were on the Yak-38 and Yak-141
The ejection seat AUTO EJECT uses collision detection to AUTO-EJECT in this case.
-
10 hours ago, Jethro11 said:
Yes, I read power line too. Is there an auto eject on the 25?
Yes.
-
That would be AUTO-EJECT! It must have been a SAM.
-
The Future US Air Force Helmet could be compatible with DCS although the Graphics would look real and it would have G affects. If any of them were to ever post a screen shot Eagle Dynamics would never hear the end of it. Who would CODE such a MOD for a HELMET?
-
-
-
Next Generation Electronic Warfare includes an SRTM JAMMER.
-
On 10/22/2022 at 1:01 PM, GUFA said:
It is very much MV-22 tech as the engines rotating up, to enable vertical takeoff is the same. It also shares the same emergency propulsion with both rotors being connected with a long shaft, that in the event of a single engine failure. One engine can power both rotors. The gen 2 tilt-rotor tech does away with the need to rotate the engines, as well as the propeller shaft that connects the rotors on the gen 1 ( MV-22,AW-609) tilt-rotors.
That would be an EMERGENCY HYDRALIC BACKUP LINE CONNECTED TO THE APU for the ENGINE PODS. There is new technology which adds ROTATING ACTUATORS which would give even more power to the rotors which might be added someday. Those would work even with the engines shut down. There is also AUTO PILOT and AUTO LAND, AUTO TAKE OFF, AUTO TRANSITION, AUTO CRUISE and AUTO HOVER.
-
1
-
-
On 10/22/2022 at 2:24 AM, Dragon1-1 said:
It should be noted that AW-609 is a civilian aircraft, and it wasn't based on the MV-22. It was a parallel design to develop the tech for civilian applications (military ones as well, but this appears to be secondary). The Valor is, so far, a purely military project, though a civilian version is likely possible.
AW609 is not a parallel project it is a different Companies Project to Boeing. Boeing will no doubt someday do a Civilian version of the Osprey as the aircraft has a lot of potential. Looks like a few additions for the AW 609 might be possible to make it simpler and safer to fly. The Osprey has some awesome technology added to it which makes it safer to operate. The early version is very difficult to fly by using the Propeller Pitch and Throttle Controls. The latest version is more agile and is easier to land. It would be noticeable on DCS if both versions were modelled. FLY BY WIRE and the other stuff makes it much safer to operate.
-
22 hours ago, Mars Exulte said:
I believe they said in the announcement they're wanting it to be the first player controlled tanker aircraft.
That would be a very good addon.
-
ZERO SPEED ZERO ALTITUDE and a good clear EJECTION VECTOR. This is a good EJECTION SEAT like the ACES III.
-
On 10/21/2022 at 7:26 AM, Dragon1-1 said:
Well, that's not the one we're getting. We're getting a regular Super Herc. You can shove the MOAB or perhaps the Daisy Cutter out of the rear door, and that's it.
The GRIFFIN MISSILES are dropped through a tube and are carried inside while HELLFIRE MISSILES are on the Hardpoints on the KC130J. The MFD has similar modes to the AH64E.
-
-
This aircraft would go extremely well with FLY BY WIRE, DECS and AUTO-PITCH CONTROL.
UH60 Autonomous
in Military and Aviation
Posted
Look at the above reply.