Jump to content

SharkWizard

Members
  • Posts

    82
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS

Recent Profile Visitors

1140 profile views
  1. I believe you could mount a virpil collective stick in the way you described if you used the higher mounting point on the bracket the opposite way around after you have removed the lips on the bracket which would interfere with the collective using a hacksaw. an out of scale drawing: the "blood" denotes where the cut happens. Maybe some virpiler can confirm this? In theory it might also be possible to attach the bracket top side down and roll the stick on its axis, and then attach it. But it would require a modified or a new limiting cam for it work sensibly after that.
  2. I am somewhat attracted to the early fulcrums, in clean brand new coats of paints in the 80s. Very nostalgic. There is also something about those 90s and early 00s disheveled looking ones
  3. Bruce Gordon has a pretty nice video on the radar scope Some good explanations on the instruments Razbam would do us a big service to model this plane after the MiG-23MLA and the Mirage III. I hope they will.
  4. As I recall the C101 has both blunt and a sharp nose depending on the skin choice (based on a bool statement in the lua I assume). The first 100 or so production MiG-29 9.12s had ventral fins which had extremely limited aerodynamic effect and were deleted afterwards. As seen on this picture It would be very nice to have these available for skin-makers as an option for those making skins for many of the famous early MiG-29s. Additionally it would be nice if the pilot model had optional moustache geometry. As we all know the aviators moustache gives a pilot 10+ to flying. All pilot meshes should have that option but I digress.
  5. Agree with you, and I just have to share this: popping the chute just before wheels touching ground :
  6. They have at least scanned a MiG-23 cockpit with the SPO-15
  7. Yes, the F-15E is out, Flogger graphics are on schedule and only now the flight model programmers at Razbam can concentrate on the three (at the very minimum) different flight models required for the MiG-23 and mixing their equations while the wings are sweeping back or forth. Very exciting.
  8. This is actually probably the biggest problem for ED at the moment. They cannot be seen to making a training tool for someone using MiG-29s against them. But this sort of beaurocratic law-fare against the folk is not unique to the Federation though.
  9. Didn't notice if it had already been mentioned in this thread. But during Enigmas interview with Overstratos from Razbam he mentioned that the MiG-25PD has basically the same weapons control system as the MiG-23MLA they are modelling for DCS currently. From that you could possibly deduce the implication that it's not completely beyond Razbam to model the PD for DCS.
  10. Mr. Enigma released this video today: Here, of course, he is "preaching to the choir" and additionally he is not Razbam. But at least he did interview Overstratos, who is in charge, at one point and the interview is linked in the video.
  11. If its any consolation, the Baas dudes look like they will be publishing a high fidelity mod of the Draken in a year or two
  12. Naval Fulcrum is way howterer especially the 9-31 which is howterest
  13. MiG-29K 9-31 original K Convair F-106A early 1960s model and a gunfighting 1970s/80s model MiG 1.42 Me-262 GIUK map
  14. Certainly. However ED did feature the old Tornado model in a trailer before the announcement of the 3rd party Tornado that is in the works at this time. We could thus say there is a precedent for this sort of revelation ritual.
  15. They actually had to fix the 29 flight model. It has a dampening system like so many other jets, which makes it much easier to handle in real life than the early pfm indicated.
×
×
  • Create New...