Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'atc'.
Found 12 results
-
Trying out ILS Landings I found that the active runway logic for Mount Pleasant is a bit off. All Tracks where made with 100°/280° METEO wind direction -> runway 28 should be active in all cases since it´s also the ILS runway with 0kts Wind runway 28 is active. with wind from 1-5kts runway 10 is actice with wind greater 5kts runway 28 is active. should be not too hard to fix and also maybe fixes some taxiing problems ( ) so maybe threads can be merged. tracks attached mount_pleasant_runway28.trkmount_pleasant_runway10.trkmount_pleasant_runway28_0_wind.trk
-
Contacting ATC assigns runway 31. Tuning ILS it is evident that ILS 13 is operating. Editor Wind: 10m 4 knots 206° Vaziani ATC ILS.trk -
Since our group's inception, we've always cared about an environment where Aerodrome Controllers, Aerospace Battle Managers, and JTACs are commonplace. We provide dynamic operations for you to really hone your skills and manage multiple pilots alongside experienced controllers! So if you have a keen interest in Controlling, whether you're new or experienced, please get in touch! Combined Arms is required and we provide free licenses for LotAtc for use on our Servers. EU Timezone - Operations on Thursday Evenings at 1830GMT/BST Training - Boasting a powerful training platform, we offer training in layered steps, at a time that suits you, with a challenge suited to each level. Community - As part of the DCAF, you’ll find opportunities to branch out. We have a diverse community for you to hang out with, and learn from. Ready to apply? https://forms.gle/fhxwzxAJVBjYfU779 Want to learn more? https://dcafoc.wixsite.com/home Come and say hi: https://discord.gg/dcaf-
- 2
-
-
- squadronfinder
- controllers
- (and 11 more)
-
Hi everyone, Very minor thing, at the moment Andersen AFB has 250.100 MHz set as its UHF tower frequency, according to this and this , the correct UHF frequency is 233.700 MHz. The VHF frequency of 125.700 MHz is however, correct.
-
- 1
-
-
- andersen afb
- tower
- (and 2 more)
-
Hi friends, * returning from a mission and your plane is barely holding itself in the air trying to make it back to base. A straight in priority approach would save you, but the traffic pattern is full and the tower tells you to enter the holding pattern because there is no request for a emergency landing, which puts you as nr.1 to land. Instead it tells you to go around. So in short : A option in the ATC menu ' Request emergency landing ' would be so helpful and activating a script that puts all inbound/surrounding traffic on go around or hold. I'm sure many pilots are out there trying to make it back in one peace while struggling holding there plane in the air upon return. Might be a helpful addon or is there another option to make this work ? Kind regards, RWC
-
ATC of FARP keeps telling me about taxiing (there is no taxiway here!), freezes when taking off, or doesn't see me landing (no option to ask to land at all). Hello ED, did you notice that we have more and more copters and next (Kiowa, Bolkov) incoming too? What about ATC for FARP, its ready only for standard airport with the runway but what about FARP?
-
Hmmm, no chocks for WW2 fighter? How is possible ;)? So can you add this option on ATC > ground crew for Anton? It is normal to heat the engine It was in old IL-2 even: Pretty please .
-
I noticed while doing a nav exercise that ATC hold doesn't hold speed over a long period of time, the speed gradually decreases, by the end of a 30 minute leg I've lost 5 knots. This is a bit of a pain for TOT calculations and navigation. Is this a bug or is it intended? I can't see how it could be anything but a bug. Method: 1. Set ATC at 420 kts 2. Engage BALT and CPL AP modes 3. Jet holds 420 4. Change pitch in order to force increase or decrease in speed > return to level flight (ATC remains engaged, not flashing) Expected result: ATC alters throttle to resume 420 Kts Actual result: ATC fails to target 420 kts, throttle does not move, ATC remains at the lowest speed reached during the pitch maneuver ATC_test.miz.zip
-
Greetings fellow simmers, Today I have come to nitpick a small, but prevalent technicality in the phraseology I hear used commonly in multiplayer servers where there is no local controller "staffing the tower," as it were, and the airfields are essentially "pilot-controlled." I say "pilot-controlled" as it is the preferred nomenclature that encompasses all sorts of non-towered operations. A "non-towered" field is a bit of a misnomer, since many airfields do have towers, but their towers do not always operate 24/7/365. They have published operating hours, and when the tower is closed, it doesn't mean the whole field is shut down. You just use the tower frequency as a CTAF, provided there is no discrete CTAF frequency published in the chart. This also distinguishes the term from "uncontrolled fields," since that is also not technically accurate. So if tower is closed, and there is no ATIS to designate which runways are in use, how do you know which one to use? The easiest answer is any one you like. In the real world, we can make use of things like the Airport Facility Directory (AFD), which has all the information that is too much to fit on a chart. This usually has things like the tower's operating hours (if applicable), traffic pattern altitude, preferred runways, noise abatement procedures, and so on. The preferred runways are also sometimes interchangeable with the "calm winds" runway(s). Winds are considered calm when below 5 knots in any direction. In calm winds, you could technically takeoff or land from any runway you wish. Of course, it is always best practice to choose the runway that most closely aligns against the wind, Sometimes this isn't possible, and you have to accept either a left or right crosswind on departure. So in these situations where the runway choice is ambiguous, which runway is "active"? All of them. But also, none of them. There are no "active runways" during pilot-controlled field operations. Active runways can only be designated by a local controller or specified in the ATIS message. At pilot-controlled fields, all runways can be "active." So when you say "taking the active" (where are you taking it, by the way?) or "clear of the active," you're not doing anyone any favors, because they don't know which runway you consider active. Always use the runway number when you're making a call that references a runway. It helps everyone listening on the frequency develop their mental picture of where you are in relation to them, and what is happening on the field, and in the traffic pattern. Always remember that pilots listening on the frequency might not be visual the field, or they are at the field but they can not see you, either because of ground obstacles or you're outside their field of view. When making your CTAF calls, pretend that you are talking to the blind. That is all. Thank you for listening to me quibble about this trivial thing!
-
Squadron name: Nemesis squadron - Timezone/OPS: We are a primarily UK based Squadron and as such we run ops roughly in the evening around 1930 GMT(BST if its summer). We also host additional ops at different times in the week so all nationalities are welcome! - Realism rating: 3/5. We try to be semi-realistic - Roles needed: We are currently recruiting for F18/16/14 and all helicopters. Other jets will be considered on contact. We are also looking for Mission designers, Opfor commanders and LotATC controllers to help make our missions be more in-depth and interesting. - Squadron Requirements: SRS is a hard requirement. Pilots to have HOTAS. RIO, CPG, WSO keyboards accepted. Some form of headtracking/VR. Recommended DLC: Supercarrier – F14/18. Maps PG/Syria. - Basic notes: We are a relatively new squadron that has enjoyed rapid growth since opening our ranks in December 2022. We have no required level of proficiency to fly with us. Flight Training Officers will run specific trainings for your airframe and missions weekly. We have an ‘Advanced Pilot Program’, who have progressed through the relevant qualifications to become our top pilots, who enjoy our advanced missions. If you are at all interested in us, come check us out, or shoot either me (@Armuax#2804 ) or @PRQ2021#6764 a DM, and we will try and answer any questions you may have! - Squadron discord:https://discord.gg/kEJsrhaPwp
-
Hello DCS Apache pilots, If your looking for a European based Squadron to fly with don't look furter, and join our Wild Wolves virtual fighter wing. Casual but aim to be milsim if possible. We are a active Apache group with trainings on every tuesday and thursday. We offer multiple trainings for both the front and the backseat. On saturday we do missions made by fellow Wild Wolves members. We have multiple campaigns. In the missions we fly combined with all our Squadrons. We also have live AWACS. Both our missions and trainings start at: 7:45PM GMT. We also have squadron's of A10 Warthogs, AWACS/ATC, F15c Strike Eagles, F16 vipers and F/A 18 hornets. And looking for new pilots within all skill levels. Check out our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/WildWolvesVFW Feel free to pop by and introduce yourself in our Discord channel. https://discord.gg/ygFpFH5kXW
-
Add option to ask ATC "where am I relative to field" or have ATC volunteer this info. Example. Called "Inbound" west of Batumi (see image), it directs to rwy 13. It gives contra course, which might seem odd. What is happening, I believe, is that anytime I call "[F1] Inbound", or keep calling "[F2] Request Azimuth", it keeps directing me to a point outside of the field in the runways extension (for runway 13, extension is to about 9 nm NW Batumi I surmise looking at F10 map). As experiment I kept calling "[F2] Request Azimuth" (Navigation assistance), it kept giving me any and all directions 75, 250, 179, 56 ... whatever (because I kept passing the point it directed me too). In daylight, you can ignore this and just keep heading for the field until it calls "cleared for visual, contact tower". In pitch black night time on the other hand ... you can keep running around forever getting new directions, never seeing the field or even being told you should see the field. One can infer I guess, if one keeps getting contradictory directions but remembering it's for rwy 13, that must mean you are NW of Batumi. One could then steer 130 hoping to see the rwy and getting the "cleared for visual, contact tower". It would be a help, especially at night, if ATC actually told you where you are relative to the field: "you are NW Batumi" followed by "steer 297" (or whatever) for "landing inception point". If ATC AI was really intelligent, of course, it would never say "297" in this situation, it would suggest a course (and altitude?) that asymptotically approaches the correct RWY approach. But adding human judgement to ATC AI is extremely complicated and will not happen. But adding an option to have ATC AI volunteer where you are relative to the field or adding an option to straight up ask "ATC where am I relative to the field?", that could be done. Following real world vocabulary of course. This brought about because I've never seen RWY lights in multiplayer ever, that I can remember so I tried an night offline mission. Yes, the RWY lights do come on when calling inbound (and goes off if you call abort landing). So then I tried some pitch black navigation and discovered I can run around forever, never seeing the field, if I keep following "[F2] Request Azimuth" directions.
