FLANKERATOR Posted July 24, 2014 Author Share Posted July 24, 2014 (edited) Scoring AWACS = 150 pts (team score) / proportional to remaining enemy fighters (pilot score) Battleship = 100 pts (team and pilot) Fighter = 50 pts (team and pilot) Striker = 25 pts (team and pilot) Strela-10/Shilka/Command Post = 10 pts each – Only at Sochi and Sukhumi – SAMs elsewhere do not reward any points Contributing to a kill = up to 50% of target value (pilot score only) Teamkill Penalty (pilot score only) = Accidental (200% of victim value) - Reckless (400% of victim value) - On purpose (ban) ROE Battle duration: 3 hours 1 life per pilot. Strikers hold short for 10mn before takeoff. if you disconnect, seek an admin on Teamspeak, explain what happened and ask for permission to rejoin. A DCS track will be saved automatically and may be requested for refereeing, if any suspicions or disputes. A fresh reboot is strongly recommended for stability and performance. Edited July 25, 2014 by FLANKERATOR Situational Awareness: https://sa-sim.com/ | The Air Combat Dojo: https://discord.gg/Rz77eFj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JunMcKill Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 (edited) You mean this Saturday mate. Good that you guys got Skyhell on Ready5! Mission-wise, I've sent a reminder to Mav to post the link for the mission file. It should be available shortly. Yes THIS saturday!:pilotfly: Thanks for the mission file!, it is good to have Ready5 and even Ready15 pilots! :thumbup: One last question is only one live for pilot? no respawn? Edited July 25, 2014 by JunMcKill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWLF.Wolf Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 One last question is only one live for pilot? no respawn? One life, don't tip over on the taxiway :thumbup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLANKERATOR Posted July 25, 2014 Author Share Posted July 25, 2014 Yes thanks for reminding us, added couple of rules about one life and team-killing. Post #1 updated :thumbup: Situational Awareness: https://sa-sim.com/ | The Air Combat Dojo: https://discord.gg/Rz77eFj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JunMcKill Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 I saw a JTAC in the mission, is CA or JTAC available? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLANKERATOR Posted July 25, 2014 Author Share Posted July 25, 2014 I saw a JTAC in the mission, is CA or JTAC available? No, this is only for admins, GCI (not available in JW2), spectators and live streaming. Situational Awareness: https://sa-sim.com/ | The Air Combat Dojo: https://discord.gg/Rz77eFj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JunMcKill Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 (edited) I noticed there is no ammo in Sukhumi and Sochi, what about this? we have to fly to Batumi or Maykop to rearm? and what color will have the coalitions in the JW2? i.e. green will be red, purple blue, etc Edited July 25, 2014 by JunMcKill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slowhand Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 (edited) Thx for miz:thumbup: BTW Will we be updating to 129(if out) or are we staying with 128? Edited July 25, 2014 by slowhand [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] SMOKE'M:smoke: IF YA GOT'M!:gun_rifle: H2o Cooler I7 9700k GA 390x MB Win 10 pro Evga RTX 2070 8Gig DD5 32 Gig Corsair Vengence, 2T SSD. TM.Warthog:joystick: :punk:, CV-1:matrix:,3x23" monitors, Tm MFD's, Saitek pro rudders wrapped up in 2 sheets of plywood:megalol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLANKERATOR Posted July 25, 2014 Author Share Posted July 25, 2014 I noticed there is no ammo in Sukhumi and Sochi, what about this? we have to fly to Batumi or Maykop to rearm? I think so - Mav who designed the mission will confirm here. and what color will have the coalitions in the JW2? i.e. green will be red, purple blue, etc Up to you guys, mission is very well balanced so if you both like the same color, then we'll do a toss :D Thx for miz:thumbup: BTW Will we be updating to 129(if out) or are we staying with 128? Please do not update, JW1 ran great on 1.2.8...we can update after this event. Great reminder. Thanks! Situational Awareness: https://sa-sim.com/ | The Air Combat Dojo: https://discord.gg/Rz77eFj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
104th_Maverick Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 I noticed there is no ammo in Sukhumi and Sochi, what about this? we have to fly to Batumi or Maykop to rearm? Yes. Both sides have identical distances to RTB to either Maykop or Batumi from Bullseye.... the distance is the same for balance! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 104th Phoenix Wing Commander / Total Poser / Elitist / Hero / Chad www.104thPhoenix.com www.facebook.com/104thPhoenix My YouTube Channel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JunMcKill Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 (edited) I think so - Mav who designed the mission will confirm here. Up to you guys, mission is very well balanced so if you both like the same color, then we'll do a toss :D Please do not update, JW1 ran great on 1.2.8...we can update after this event. Great reminder. Thanks! Flanker I propose that the admins give today the side (color) to every coalition in the JW2, its better, because today we will practice using the color asigned. Regards. Edited July 25, 2014 by JunMcKill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JunMcKill Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 I think so - Mav who designed the mission will confirm here. Up to you guys, mission is very well balanced so if you both like the same color, then we'll do a toss :D Please do not update, JW1 ran great on 1.2.8...we can update after this event. Great reminder. Thanks! ;2127035']Yes. Both sides have identical distances to RTB to either Maykop or Batumi from Bullseye.... the distance is the same for balance! IMHO, I think is not a good idea, it's better to have limited ammo in both bases, with a slow recharge rate, for example after one hour, anyway, you are the designer!:pilotfly: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X-man Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 People are already starting updating their DCS. Are we really gonna fly this on 1.2.8? 64th Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 135.181.115.54 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JunMcKill Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 People are already starting updating their DCS. Are we really gonna fly this on 1.2.8? If someone want to test the 1.2.9, try with the openbeta, it doesn't change the original version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcon_S Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 People are already starting updating their DCS. Are we really gonna fly this on 1.2.8? And from me the same question. 1.2.9 is beta and 104th server run on it already. So, i need install BETA anyway? Or...? :helpsmilie: Quote Немој ништа силом, узми већи чекић! MSI Tomahawk MAX | Ryzen 7 3700x | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz | RX 5700 XT OC Red Dragon 8GB | VPC Throttle CM3 + VPC Constellation ALPHA on VPC WarBRD Base | HP Reverb G2 Youtube | Follow Me on TWITCH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustang Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 1.2.9 is essentially 1.2.8 but with the F-86 and other goodies, MP should be identical in terms of stability. P.S: the 104th server can be easily rolled back to 1.2.8 no problems if needed, all options are available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcon_S Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 1.2.9 is essentially 1.2.8... I tried to get in 104th with 1.2.8 but connection interupted... so need 1.2.9 :P ... lazy to download. OK... downloading now. Quote Немој ништа силом, узми већи чекић! MSI Tomahawk MAX | Ryzen 7 3700x | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz | RX 5700 XT OC Red Dragon 8GB | VPC Throttle CM3 + VPC Constellation ALPHA on VPC WarBRD Base | HP Reverb G2 Youtube | Follow Me on TWITCH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLANKERATOR Posted July 25, 2014 Author Share Posted July 25, 2014 Guys, I think we need to avoid Beta. JW1 ran nicely on 1.2.8. We need to stick to the release version not beta. Situational Awareness: https://sa-sim.com/ | The Air Combat Dojo: https://discord.gg/Rz77eFj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLANKERATOR Posted July 25, 2014 Author Share Posted July 25, 2014 IMHO, I think is not a good idea, it's better to have limited ammo in both bases, with a slow recharge rate, for example after one hour, anyway, you are the designer!:pilotfly: Initial idea was no refuel no rearm near the frontline (Sochi/sukhumi), then we decided to allow refueling at least. JW2 will require a lot of coordination and discipline from fighters, any gap could be used by the enemy to strike ground forces or sneak in for HVTs like the AWACS. A permanent presence over the target area will be a must. Situational Awareness: https://sa-sim.com/ | The Air Combat Dojo: https://discord.gg/Rz77eFj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustang Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 Guys, I think we need to avoid Beta. JW1 ran nicely on 1.2.8. We need to stick to the release version not beta. 1.2.9 will run just as stable as 1.2.8, just sayin :) don't be worried just because it's in open beta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLANKERATOR Posted July 25, 2014 Author Share Posted July 25, 2014 1.2.9 will run just as stable as 1.2.8, just sayin :) don't be worried just because it's in open beta. I hope so Mustang...IIRC, 1.2.4 was a solid build for MP, then things started to go haywire after 1.2.5 and forced us to cancel a bunch of events. I think 1.2.9 needs some testing first, to make sure nothing got broken. JW2 is imminent...I'd go for the proven 1.2.8 :) Situational Awareness: https://sa-sim.com/ | The Air Combat Dojo: https://discord.gg/Rz77eFj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X-man Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 1.2.9 is not open beta. The Sabre is in open beta. I just updated my full DCS to 1.2.9... 64th Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 135.181.115.54 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustang Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 We're currently running 1.2.9 on our server at full capacity (27 clients) and there are no problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaliG Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 We're currently running 1.2.9 on our server at full capacity (27 clients) and there are no problems. Yes I noticed I could not login (I am still on 128 ). So what is going to be? We stay 128 or update? I am confused. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] TaliG - 373vFS “Do not repeat the tactics which have gained you one victory, but let your methods be regulated by the infinite variety of circumstances.” Sun Tzu, The Art of War Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcon_S Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 (edited) :joystick: I update OpenBeta only (for play on 104th tonight) not 1.2.8. So what to do with 1.2.8? Flanky, please finish this dilemma! :huh: EDIT: Just saw your sig: Important! Please, do not update your DCS version if a new release comes out in the meantime. Let's all stay on 1.2.8 for JW2. Edited July 25, 2014 by Falcon_S Quote Немој ништа силом, узми већи чекић! MSI Tomahawk MAX | Ryzen 7 3700x | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz | RX 5700 XT OC Red Dragon 8GB | VPC Throttle CM3 + VPC Constellation ALPHA on VPC WarBRD Base | HP Reverb G2 Youtube | Follow Me on TWITCH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts