eyusuf 发布于2014年9月19日 发布于2014年9月19日 (已编辑) There's appears to be alot of confusion in the way pylon numbering is presented in the air to air tutorial. Heres a youtube to link to illustrate: 本帖最后于2014年9月19日,由eyusuf编辑
Nereid 发布于2014年9月19日 发布于2014年9月19日 Yes, but it's not LN fault. The numbering of the pylons in the mission loudout is unrelated to the pylon numbering in flight. Numbering is: (left) 3 1 2 4 (right) A simple graphic that illustrate the numbering in the manual would be nice. But I see no bug here. DCS:A-10C / DCS:Ka-50 / DCS:UH-1H / DCS:Mig21bis / DCS:P-51D / DCS:Mi-8MTV2 / DCS:Fw190D9 / DCS:Bf109K4 / DCS:C-101EB / DCS:L-39C / DCS:F-5E / DCS:Spitfire LF Mk. IX / DCS:AJS37
eyusuf 发布于2014年9月20日 楼主 发布于2014年9月20日 (已编辑) Yes, but it's not LN fault. The numbering of the pylons in the mission loudout is unrelated to the pylon numbering in flight. Numbering is: (left) 3 1 2 4 (right) A simple graphic that illustrate the numbering in the manual would be nice. But I see no bug here. Nor would you, except if you were about to go into real combat and that was the guy instructing you. You'd see the bug, post haste. Gauranteed. I guess its like Einstein said ... all things are relative. Even instruction. But, having said that. Thanks for clarifying the numbering. 本帖最后于2014年9月20日,由eyusuf编辑
Nereid 发布于2014年9月20日 发布于2014年9月20日 Nor would you, except if you were about to go into real combat and that was the guy instructing you. You'd see the bug, post haste. Gauranteed. Ah! The instruction is wrong? Never tried it. But the numbering is weird - even for the the instructor perhaps. ;) You have to drink a lot of wodka to get it right... :D DCS:A-10C / DCS:Ka-50 / DCS:UH-1H / DCS:Mig21bis / DCS:P-51D / DCS:Mi-8MTV2 / DCS:Fw190D9 / DCS:Bf109K4 / DCS:C-101EB / DCS:L-39C / DCS:F-5E / DCS:Spitfire LF Mk. IX / DCS:AJS37
MTFDarkEagle 发布于2014年9月20日 发布于2014年9月20日 Don't forget to "THINK RUSSIAN"!!!! :beer::matrix: Lukas - "TIN TIN" - 9th Shrek Air Strike Squadron TIN TIN's Cockpit thread
JG-1_Vogel 发布于2014年9月20日 发布于2014年9月20日 Thanks for this, must admit I was getting a little confused and this has cleared things up for me :).
已推荐帖子