[EVALUATING] ASP should use radar ranging.

[sissypilot]

Multiple sources proved on discussion page that ASP is not implemented correctly especially in A-A mode.

本帖最后于2015年3月12日，由Cobra847编辑

[PiedDroit]

Someone please close this, there is already at least 3 threads on the subject.

EDIT: I don't even know what's the truth about it. Devs are fully aware of the discussion, let them work in peace now (and use the search function to locate the threads).

本帖最后于2015年2月22日，由PiedDroit编辑

[sissypilot]

There is not single thread on the issue in the bugs and problems section.

[PiedDroit]

There is not single thread on the issue in the bugs and problems section.

One of them is in the "Weapons" subsection:

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=132696

 

here is another one (that was moderated a short time ago):

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=139165

 

I believe if you search for "ASP" in the whole LN forum you should find another one, I don't remember where it is.

 

This point has been discussed for a while now and there is not much new things to be brought to the devs attention now.

I'm confident they will address this the best way possible.

[sissypilot]

Thanks. I thought ASP is avionics not weapon :)

I see endless debate. Did anyone come to a solution? Because I think ASP is a mess as it is.

[PiedDroit]

Yeah it's avionics, but... related to weapons as well so neither is wrong I guess.

If something is a mess, but "as per aircraft", well, it's not a mess anymore :D.

To summarize, some people came with sources saying that ASP should be slaved to the radar in certain modes (I won't give details I leave the reading up to you).

Current LN position is that the current implementation is correct.

Since there was a lot of fuss about it I suppose they will come up with something - or maybe not. Either way, it's counter productive to start that debate again now.

[sissypilot]

Good. How do you know LN position? Even their manual says it should on page 132. They don't agree with themselves? :) That is indeed a fruitless debate...

[PiedDroit]

Read there: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=139165&page=4

Posts 34 and 46

[Art-J]

Well, one way or another, the issue has been noted by devs. If we don't have any new tech documentation about sight and the radar, let's just wait and see what next patch or two will bring.

[sissypilot]

All I know is that I set a tanker steady in front of me, lock on it some 1km away and try to shoot at it with guns the bursts fall short consequently. The GS23 is a capable gun with a range of 2km I highly doubt that they did not pair it with a capable ASP as predecessors to the Bis fighter were able to range properly.

Anyway lets see what they come up with....

[Harle]

Read there: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=139165&page=4

Posts 34 and 46

 

Read there http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2324661&postcount=46