What do you want to see most in DCS World?

[Ultra]

My nick is old from falcon bms. But i stopped flying F16. İ dont think devs won't add F16 in the game. [sorry for my english]

 

Oh ok. I too would like to see an F-15E.

[WinterH]

Dynamic Mission / Campaigns would be it for me, way ahead of 4th gen multiroles.

 

There are some 4th gen multirole aircraft I would love to play with, but what can be added by more dynamic and continous missions/campaigns, possible for both single and multiplayer alike, outweighs those aircraft by a very significant margin for me. Also prospect of doing new fighters at DCS level of realism (apart from a few fairly declassified ones like F-18 and F-16) is a questionable prospect in my opinion. Whereas, an improved mission system would benefit each and every module ever released, and will be released, even the most interesting aircraft module ever would only add itself to the sim.

 

That's just me anyway :)

 

Edit : Well I see new options, my choice still remains Dynamic campaign system but, I'd also love more pre 4th gen aircraft from 40s upto and including 80s :). More plausible, and as far as I'm concerned more fun!

[Soulres]

More Helo's and More Attention to Ground Forces (Player Controlled)

[Ultra]

I'm glad to see that the interest in "old stuff" is so low. (C'mon guys you have plenty of WWII sims!)

 

I think that's because he just added it to the poll. It wasn't an option at first.

[kontiuka]

Voted for DCS (oops, I mean, Dynamic Campaign System). New theatre maps would be a close second.

[Antimon]

Well F/A-18 and many other in the works and with new maps I voted for Dynamic Campaign as that is really only BIG THING missing from DCS.

 

ATC and weather system improvements in a shared second place because IMMERSION!!!

Edited November 1, 2015 by Antimon
Typo

[Wine]

My biggest wishes,

 

#1: F16 with various model options.

#2: External aircraft sounds.

#3: Pylon removal as option on all aircraft ( for aerobatic purpose ).

[PiedDroit]

Dynamic campaign system for me as well.

[Nightmare]

We need multirole fighters ( F18 ) with Dynamic campaign !

[Face521]

F/A-18 E is all i need :)

[xxJohnxx]

Multiplayers under 1 flight. 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, all recognized as human players under the leadership of 1-1. shared waypoints for the flight, 1-1 and others can use the easy comms to communicate orders and commands. Not sure if that fits under improved multiplayer or not.

 

That is actually possible with the mission editor in 1.5.

[hannibal]

Uber DCS+ would be a combination of DCS (detailed cockpits/physics/eye candy), FSX (ATC/world terrain/weather) and BMS (dynamic campaign/multi theater)...

 

personally i would like to see PERSISTENT STATS, but i think many will disagree... but to have a score list brings in new (noob-ish) players, but out of the many new players will bring few dedicated hardcore pilots that i think will build on the existing fan base. (a reason why Warthunder is popular).. sure you will have team killers that shoot at anything cause they dont understand real life game play, but thats why you have passworded servers! ok, so the mature pilot doesnt care about stats, but i think there are ppl out there waiting to boost their achievements have a crown of top gun in this facebook age of narcissism! lol (personally i dont like flying for 30mins to 2 hours, kill targets, and it was all for nothing when i exit the server..)

 

as much as i would like a World Size DCS, not going to happen because of hardware limitations (why FSX appeals) but what i think is possible is a richer ATC (or even carrier OPS) experience. DCS has possibility of an amazing experience just from sheer joy of dealing with checklist, radio freq's, ATC comms just to take off from one point, enjoy the views and land to the next airport/base/air station/aerodrome (working with flight plans)... add richer weather experience cause FSX clouds are soo amazing

 

i hear alot that BMS > DCS due to the dynamic campaign. i dont play BMS, but i do understand why, i do have to say in my past experience of DCS, DCS gets boring when the missions i play, i losses my interest when looking for that one stupid unit hidden somewhere that you have to clear before moving on to the next task...

 

probably the most game changer tech now is VR. i am super looking for cooperative multi-seat play in VR. currently facebook backed oculus released 'oculus social' app for on their platform.. the social aspect of VR is ENORMOUS. From reddit forms and youtube, DCS is hands down on of theeee MOST BEST VR EXPERIENCES for the rift VR headset. With facebook/oculus advancing social multiplay apps, I feel multiplay experience on DCS will be UNREAL.

huey with 2 gunners.. a B-17 with turret guns... :) :)

 

i look forward to the day i am in DCS AH-1W Cobra as a gunner, in VR with a buddy pilot in a multiplayer session fighting our way through a dynamic campaign in Granada (some very scenic location to show EDGE)

 

i end this by saying with or with out these features, DCS is still hands down the best sim out there, nothing else comes close, i am even lucky to experience a fraction of what you guys have brought/released.. the A-10C an UH-1H alone is a feat of software programming by itself.

 

love hannibal.. ^_^

Edited November 1, 2015 by hannibal

[Elo001]

Registered just so I can vote in this

 

Imo the one thing holding DCS back from being THE best flight simulator is actual missions/content embedded in a larger context

 

The dynamic campaign of BMS is amazing and actually gives the missions you fly "meaning", it's the thing that puts BMS ahead of DCS for me. Dynamic search&rescue missions for choppers to extract (dynamically shot down) pilots for instance would make DCS so much better

 

Like, seriously, I'd easily pay 50 bucks for a dynamic campaign module

Edited November 1, 2015 by Elo001

[Boris]

Really, dynamic campaigns is winning? I fail to see the appeal... Scripted campaigns are far more immersive.

There are so many things listed that are far more important. Combat theatres to fit the aircraft for instance. Also, in depth ATC is far more fundamental to realism.

[VTJS17_Fire]

When the Hornet is released > more maps. But only with this fighter.

[Call911]

The rest will come with time, so better MP w/dedicated server pls :D

[Laro]

A dynamic campaign system could be nice for MP and SP.

Setting up a server with a list of allowed aircraft and the dc system does the rest.

Random frontline between red and blue side and random generated missions.

 

When a player joins, he can decide to pick one of the generated missions or select free flight.

When the timer for a generated mission runs down to zero and no player selected that mission, the AI will fly that mission.

 

Maybe with some kind of resource management, like flying weapons/fuel/spare parts to a FARP with our nice transpot helicopters.

There would always be some action on a server and you could use a lot of different aircraft in "one mission".

[glynd02]

An Apache Longow as Combat-Helo has bitten the dust :cry_2:

[will487]

I voted combat theatre maps,

 

BUT:

I would LOVE to see multi engine aircraft appear in DCS World :)

[gospadin]

Everyone who didn't vote dynamic campaign has probably never tried to make a mission before.

[Fudge]

Other, open mod tools such as 3d export from a free package eg Blender.

 

Followed by multiplayer campaigns.

[fostiras]

I really anticipate 4th gen aircrafts. Secondly, dynamic campaign would be a feature that would make the game a lot more interesting. Finally, I believe that most of Dcs players including me would really like new engine sounds (basically externals). Imagine feeling those goosebumps while playing Dcs and listening to real-life external engine sounds…

[Toxic]

Dynamic campaign system!!

[steele6]

Multi-role 4th gen aircraft First!

 

THen the dynamic Campaign :)

[Kal-El]

Combat theater for me. All seems out of place if you don't fly where it belongs.