What do you want to see most in DCS World?

[Jumbik]

When people vote for Dynamic Campaign, I suppose they they want a Dynamic Multiplayer campaign right?

 

The scripted single player ones are really good already.

 

Dynamic Multiplayer campaigns would be the second best thing after F-18C :)

[scaflight]

A dynamic campaign would probably see a considerable influx of BMS vets. :)

[TomCatMucDe]

By the way Wags, why do you ask? :D will we get one of these soon ? :D DCS 2.x or 3?

[jemi]

F/A-18 C is all i need

[Silver_Dragon]

A dynamic campaign would probably see a considerable influx of BMS vets. :)

 

Sorry, but Falcon campaign has copyrighter. ED make other point outside F-4.

[totoaero]

I chose "Improved multiplayer with dedicated server and online performance tracking"

 

and after : IA bombers for WW2 (B17, B25, Ju88, He111) and then new 3d model for the older, like B52, Mig23, C17, B1, Tu95 etc...

[Peter5on]

And they could sell Dynamic Campaigns funcionality as a payware DLC, and make money to expand.

[jj_pt]

Dynamic campaign system with multiplayer abbility

 

Ditto.

[VIKBELL]

I said 4th generation ,but I was torn also with Vietnam era .

[Mysticpuma]

Just give us a WW2 P-51 visual model (which is required for the new WW2 Europe expansion), so remove the twin antenna to a single one behind the canopy, remove the antenna under the front cowling and remove the squiggly antenna in the tail.

 

Job done.

 

Cheers, MP

[JLX]

Dynamic campaigns!

 

Not just dynamic but with added variety and just plain more of them. There are still bugs in some of the missions included with the modules. I'd like to see in-depth and and highly polished campaigns with really high production value as flight sim'ing for me is still a single player affair.

 

A better ATC system was a very close second. Looking forward to checking out Hollywood's VIACOM 2.0! But I'd love to see some much more sophisticated and flexible radio implementation within DCS itself.

 

VR (both Rift and Vive) wasn't on the list but I'm assuming that's a no brainer ;-)

[gregzagk]

This is mostly a priority list and not a wishlist as most of the selections are on the way right? :)

 

So IMO, in order to proceed to a Dynamic Campaign System which is really important, we would first need a stable Multiplayer - Dedicated server system.

 

That together with performance tracking will lead first to user made Dynamic Campaigns as the mission builders will not have to limit themselves due to performance issues.

 

That can give time to ED to built a complete Dynamic Campaign system which will get better time to time with the additions of Theaters and new modules.

 

Stability is the first priority for me as clients join to relax and simulate war situations and not to deal with technical issues.

 

Multiplayer should be the future and we won't be able to use any of the additions without a stable server system. :)

 

Keep it up ED!

 

Greg

[AndyHill]

Dynamic campaigns, BOTH single AND multiplayer.

[Ciribob]

I voted dedicated server. It would be a huge help for multiplayer!

[Haukka81]

Dynamic campaigns, BOTH single AND multiplayer.

 

THIS , AND single and mp dynamic campaings should be same. :joystick:

[WildBillKelsoe]

AI overhaul

[Pirogoth]

Dynamic campaign, absolutely.

[Esonub]

Wags, first thing thank you for asking the community ! ... Second thing is of course Dynamic campaign will make the game much more better ...

 

I hate to compare stuff but now i have too ... look at the dynamic campaign in Falcon BMS its so much fun and versatile.

im pretty sure something like that will change the whole game interface, but imagine that its not gonna be like 20 F-15c against 20 Su-27's in the air dogfighting same time ... its all Dynamic.

[Leonski]

F-16A,B,C,D,E,F,MLU,Block anyway all the models!!

Or just ask Aerosoft as a 3th party.

[greco.bernardi]

1- New sounds, effects and visuals

2- New theathers (Normandy map too)

3- Better damage model for WWII birds

[Shadowowweosa]

иностранцы - судя по результатам опроса, вы все сошли сума.

[Bullitt]

Dynamic campaign hands down. Right now lack of content in the way of missions is one of DCS' biggest short comings, and while adding new missions and campaigns helps it does get old playing the same missions over and over again.

 

With a dynamic campaign system in place thing like replay ability are no longer an issue. Players won't have to rely on other to get new mission to enjoy or be forced to fly a mission they created taking out much of the surprise of whats going on. Not only that but mission types. Want to fly SEAD? Do a fighter sweep? Take out an Airfield? Instead of searching trying to find a mission or building one from scratch just select that mission type in your campaign and go to town. It may take more time and work to setup something like this, but in the end it would save a lot of time and resources down the road I would think than trying to keep your customers happy by constantly having to build new missions and campaign stories throughout the lifespan of this great simulation.

[Pikey]

didnt even read beyond dynamic campaign. You all need to go create more missions and feel the pain of hungry sqn mates looking for content. DYnamic campaign ftw.

[Rogue Trooper]

DC for me.

If I could merge 2 then DC on a dedicated server with stats.

[Gaanalma]

But, why do we need a dynamic campaign first, if then we can not flying it in multiplayer, for server problems and Netcode restrictions?

Edited November 1, 2015 by Gaanalma