What do you want to see most in DCS World?

[nen]

Just imagine to fly a dynamic campaign with your squadron mates vs other squadron or the machine in Korea or Vietnam theatres. Mig 15 vs Sabres or Mig 21 vs Phamtoms, Thunderchiefs or Supersabres...

[Force10]

I voted for Dynamic Campaign.

 

But what I'm really after is more or less a career system. Being in a squadron with wingmen that have names, a squadron kill board, medals, a chance to move up in rank...etc.

 

Making a campaign truly dynamic can be a daunting task...so more like dynamic mission assignments within a career system is what I'm trying to say.

 

It would breathe new life into the modules owned IMO.

[Scoggs]

Had to register just to vote. Dynamic Campaigns would be soo sweet.

 

This here shows why Dynamic Campaigns are such an important feature that needs to be added to DCS.

 

Even though I voted for 4th Gen fighters (cause... Hornet) the more players we can pull in the better the game can be.

[RoflSeal]

Dynamic Campaign would be so sweet.

[Toxic]

The Dynamic Campaign & an F-4 phantom :D

[Home Fries]

+1 for the Dynamic Campaign System.

 

This could be the gift that keeps on giving, especially if it is generating an ongoing war like the Falcon 4.0 system.

 

Imagine creating campaigns using the ME to set orders of battle, supply lines, control objectives, having LUA customizable AI "personalities" in charge of the war effort with different ways of achieving strategic goals, and the ability to jump into any aircraft in the campaign (for which you own the module) and fly with others in an persistent environment!

Edited November 2, 2015 by Home Fries

[Stonehouse]

Very much would like a dynamic campaign but considering the effort involved I voted for new maps because that seems more likely to happen soon.

[DracoLlasa]

Thats hard to pick just one.

 

Regarding Vehicles, i would say that

4th generation, multirole fighters

New helicopters, like attack helos, we have some good utility helos, but we need more 'modern' attack helos

 

Then regarding 'other' i would say

Dynamic campaign system

Then maybe New and improved air traffic control system, but DCS 2.0 may cover this for me.

[rrohde]

Hard to choose, Wags...

 

I picked 4th Gen Fighters, since I would like to see DCS move forward - and not backward (i.e., WWII or Vietnam etc), with a lot more coming from ED and Belsimtek specifically.

 

DCS World is a flight simulation platform, which ED can expand upon and make it future-proof. Because of that, DCS needs an overhaul of ATC procedures, much improved special effects, and a dynamic campaign. That should be the building block for all future content.

 

With a dynamic campaign, add-on missions and campaigns become less important.

 

Oh, and attack helos? Yes please. AH-64 and Mi-28. :)

[PiedDroit]

Very much would like a dynamic campaign but considering the effort involved I voted for new maps because that seems more likely to happen soon.

You've been kindly ask what you want most by the developer himself, there's no better time to voice your preference ;)

[HiJack]

We need a dedicated server to have fun with dynamic campaign as you cant almost have moving units in the current version with much over 16 players. We need a server that runs many players, human jtac, human players in ground war and a server that holds thugs and cheaters out.

Edited November 2, 2015 by HiJack

[pepin1234]

Infantry specialized squad.

[AH_Sid]

Improved multiplayer with dedicated server and online performance tracking.

[Cali]

I'll like to see a DC like what Falcon 4 has.

[Evilducky]

As much as I'd like a dynamic campaign, I had to pick other because I'd much rather see them work on bringing the FC3 aircraft to a DCS level over the dynamic campaign. The aircraft I enjoy flying are all stuck at the FC3 level while the US gets all the cool clickable airplanes :(

[Sierra99]

If by 4th generation fighters you mean F-16 then yes please. Blue Forces are seriously Behind the 8 Ball when it comes to SEAD missions. Yes I know an A-10 can perform SEAD...but it's a little unrealistic. I know the F-18 is coming...The simple fact is I have a Thrustmaster Cougar I have never used to its fullest because F-16 sims to date have not been DCS quality.

 

After that, dynamic campaign and realistic ATC would be my next items.

[AMEDooley]

I'm all for a dynamic campaign! That would make the game infinitely better. The problem I have with the campaigns right now if if I fail, I just redo the mission. I want to see a step back if I fail. It'll seem more like a true war campaign. It would increase replay and bring in more pilots. Who would fly falcon BMS when you could play a far superior sim imho.

[BlackLion213]

Thank you for this poll, I'm glad there is real interest in all of these topics.

 

I voted for new theaters since thats what many of the current DCS modules need to complete the experience.

 

That said, a Dynamic Campaign is much like the huge upgrade offered by DCS1.5 - it enhances all of the existing modules and would make any campaign much more realistic. Would probably increase the relative value of DLC campaigns as well.

 

I also think more 4th gen fighters is sure to be popular, I couldn't say no to any of them.

 

My 2 cents,

 

Nick

[Sierra99]

I selected the dynamic campaign, but I also have one for "other"

 

Multiplayers under 1 flight. 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, all recognized as human players under the leadership of 1-1. shared waypoints for the flight, 1-1 and others can use the easy comms to communicate orders and commands. Not sure if that fits under improved multiplayer or not.

 

AegisFX this is implemented with 1.5... Unless I have no idea what you're talking about.:music_whistling:

[Sierra99]

I feel like before anything new is released (After DCS 2.0) The devs time should be spent fixing all the existing bugs and getting the current modules out of beta. This includes fixing the ATC logic.

 

This way any new content in the future can arrive with a clean slate and not have years of old bugs coming along with them.

 

+1

[AEF SNOWMAN 161 SQN]

That ATC definitely needs an upgrade. Randomized male/female voices for approaches, taxi, clearance, and take off. Would bring a more realistic element to the sim.

[spamhater160]

Could maybe the Rafale fit under that 4th generation category? ;)

[Lucky]

AH-64D

[SchniX]

Hi,

 

I voted for Dynamic campaign system.

 

New maps already in progress, so i didn't choose it, but, IMO, new maps should have more focus, more official third parties working on many different maps, and also releasing the map creating tools to the community, i know the concern about quality etc..but, there are very talented peoples and groups. it will boost and make the success of the sim much more big IMO.

 

Also, optimization of the amount of vehicles, CA is great, but, on multiplayer, moving few groups of vehicles causes a lot of lags and make it unplayable.

 

Last thing, i would love that the work on the F-16C and AH-64A will continue.

 

Thx

[thaisocom]

Really hard choose...still I'd love to see more helos UH-60, OH-58, CH-47 and etc. Hence, I choose more helos.

 

Sent from my C6602 using Tapatalk