cichlidfan Posted July 10, 2016 Share Posted July 10, 2016 (edited) I played around with each plane I have (I have all except the Gazelle) and here's what I did for the A-10C: I'm sure you guys know that TIR has included a profile for the A10C. Just look in the "Titles" tab in the TIR software for DCS: A-10C. There is no profile for DCS A-10C in TIR. All you did was assign the default profile, unless you selected one of the other two, to the old standalone version of DCS A-10C. IIRC, if you want to assign a specific profile (one of the three defaults, or a custom one) to DCS World you should select Black Shark as the title to assign it to. TIR comes with three profiles. They are located in C:\Program Files (x86)\NaturalPoint\TrackIR5\Profiles. EDIT: Here is the relevant text from the manual. 5.8.2 Title Management The Titles section displays a list of all TrackIR enhanced Titles, allows sorting by genre, and enables you to assign a profile to a TrackIR Enhanced title so that the profile will be loaded automatically when the title starts. In order to associate profiles with titles, click on the drop-down list on the right-hand side and select a new one from the list of available profiles. Keep in mind that the profile will not be loaded until the title is started. Edited July 11, 2016 by cichlidfan ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1 :thumbup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay43 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 18 pages later and its beginning to grow on me, the explanation here and then flying for quite some time makes perfect sense as to why it was changed. I spent quite a few hours now re-setting tir to suit the new view and feel this is how its meant to be and there should be an option but this the best view we now have line of sight, you shouldn't be constantly looking down. Yes you need to look down and glance at instruments but that is all you need the hud has the rest, just spend a bit of time adjusting the pitch in tir and you're good to go. Now i just need a little more fps.... Eagles may soar high but weasel's don't get sucked into jet engines. System Spec. Monitors: Samsung 570DX & Rift CV1 Mobo: MSI Godlike gaming X-99A CPU: Intel i7 5930K @ 3.50Ghz RAM: 32gb GPU: EVGA Nvidia GTX 980Ti VR Ready Cooling: Predator 360 Power Supply: OCZ ZX Series 80 Plus Gold Drives: Samsung SSD's 1tb, 500g plus others with OS Win10 64 bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjohnson241 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 There is no profile for DCS A-10C in TIR. All you did was assign the default profile, unless you selected one of the other two, to the old standalone version of DCS A-10C. IIRC, if you want to assign a specific profile (one of the three defaults, or a custom one) to DCS World you should select Black Shark as the title to assign it to. TIR comes with three profiles. They are located in C:\Program Files (x86)\NaturalPoint\TrackIR5\Profiles. EDIT: Here is the relevant text from the manual. I have an A-10C profile in my TIR titles and it activates a hen I fly the A -10C. I adjusted the view center in that profile and it worked. The Profile may have been a residual from the old stand-alone A-10C but I know I didn't create the profile. It works and that's all that matters. Hi [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 3rd Mar Div RVN '66-'67 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Art-J Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 Well, just to clear things up, there IS an A-10C profile in default TiR software, though I don't know how it works, 'cause I've never used it :). i7 9700K @ stock speed, single GTX1070, 32 gigs of RAM, TH Warthog, MFG Crosswind, Win10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoochiekoo Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 What key, or key combo, do you have defined for centering? If it is a key/key combo used by DCS, it is possible that DCS is trapping the keystroke and not letting TIR ever see it. I have mine set to keys that DCS does not use, which, thus far, has given me no problems. Now I've set Rctrl+F9 as the center TrackIR key but still can't center TrackIR in game. I fly Su-25T and there is no RCtrl+F9 in the command key. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gliptal Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 18 pages later and its beginning to grow on me, the explanation here and then flying for quite some time makes perfect sense as to why it was changed. I spent quite a few hours now re-setting tir to suit the new view and feel this is how its meant to be and there should be an option but this the best view we now have line of sight, you shouldn't be constantly looking down. Yes you need to look down and glance at instruments but that is all you need the hud has the rest, just spend a bit of time adjusting the pitch in tir and you're good to go. Now i just need a little more fps....The HUD is not sanctioned for instruments flying. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aginor Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 The HUD is not sanctioned for instruments flying. Love that argument. While technically true it is hard to explain to guys who just know the HUD is never wrong in the sim except when you were hit. But yeah... Working TrackIR is kind of necessary, and (at least in my short testing session) it seemed to work OK in 1.5.4 DCSW weapons cheat sheet speed cheat sheet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foul Ole Ron Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 Wasn't happy when I first tried out the A-10 in 1.5.4 but after fiddling around with Track IR for a few mins so I could see the HUD and MFCDs together and getting used to the new view I don't think I'd go back. Feels like a good change overall but I guess an option for either type would be best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjohnson241 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 Wasn't happy when I first tried out the A-10 in 1.5.4 but after fiddling around with Track IR for a few mins so I could see the HUD and MFCDs together and getting used to the new view I don't think I'd go back. Feels like a good change overall but I guess an option for either type would be best. +1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 3rd Mar Div RVN '66-'67 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagnumHB Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 Wasn't happy when I first tried out the A-10 in 1.5.4 but after fiddling around with Track IR for a few mins so I could see the HUD and MFCDs together and getting used to the new view I don't think I'd go back. Feels like a good change overall but I guess an option for either type would be best. If you had to fiddle around with the TrackIR for several minutes to get a view you were satisfied with, one that includes both the HUD and MFCDs, I don't see how you actually like the change. What you did was unfortunately waste your actual playing time with control tweaking to presumably try to get the view as close as possible to the old one. That doesn't sound like a positive experience to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkateZilla Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 TrackIR has never been a out of the box plug n play device, it's always required some tuning and personal adjustments on a per user basis. it's only natural to have to adjust settings and curves when the behavior changes. Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cichlidfan Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 I have an A-10C profile in my TIR titles and it activates a hen I fly the A -10C. I adjusted the view center in that profile and it worked. The Profile may have been a residual from the old stand-alone A-10C but I know I didn't create the profile. It works and that's all that matters. Hi Well, just to clear things up, there IS an A-10C profile in default TiR software, though I don't know how it works, 'cause I've never used it :). If it makes you happy to think that, then fine. The Titles list in TIR is a list of EVERY single title that TIR works with. If you think they have a profile for each and every game, then you are welcome to think that. It still is not true. ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1 :thumbup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Art-J Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 Roger, it is only a list allright. Never bothered with checking what it is and how it works, 'cause I've been using my own single profile for all apps from the get go. Thought it was coming with a set of profiles (it's surprisingly short list after all), but after having a second look, nope it doesn't. I admit I was wrong, though not sure if Your trademarked somewhat arrogant attitude in pointing it out was necessary. 1 i7 9700K @ stock speed, single GTX1070, 32 gigs of RAM, TH Warthog, MFG Crosswind, Win10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foul Ole Ron Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 If you had to fiddle around with the TrackIR for several minutes to get a view you were satisfied with, one that includes both the HUD and MFCDs, I don't see how you actually like the change. What you did was unfortunately waste your actual playing time with control tweaking to presumably try to get the view as close as possible to the old one. That doesn't sound like a positive experience to me. The view is different from the old one still after tweaking. After playing with it for a while I prefer the new view - seems more natural. Only took 5-10 mins of tweaking so I won't be losing any sleep over my time being wasted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dburne Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 The view is different from the old one still after tweaking. After playing with it for a while I prefer the new view - seems more natural. Only took 5-10 mins of tweaking so I won't be losing any sleep over my time being wasted. I have gotten mine a little better with tweaking as well, can't say yet that I like the new way better though, time will tell for me. I am making progress though. Don B EVGA Z390 Dark MB | i9 9900k CPU @ 5.1 GHz | Gigabyte 4090 OC | 64 GB Corsair Vengeance 3200 MHz CL16 | Corsair H150i Pro Cooler |Virpil CM3 Stick w/ Alpha Prime Grip 200mm ext| Virpil CM3 Throttle | VPC Rotor TCS Base w/ Alpha-L Grip| Point Control V2|Varjo Aero| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gavagai Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 Yes you need to look down and glance at instruments but that is all you need the hud has the rest I've watched a real Viper pilot fly the simulation of the F-16C. His eyes were on 3 places 90% of the time: the HUD, FCR, and RWR. You can see the HUD, FCR, RWR and the sky at the same time in the real cockpit with your head level. With the limited FOV of a computer display you have to compromise. If you set your view so that your natural resting place for your head doesn't show the most vital information you are sacrificing SA. You get a nice view of the sky and clouds, but your reaction time will be delayed, or worse, you could miss something vitally important. 1 P-51D | Fw 190D-9 | Bf 109K-4 | Spitfire Mk IX | P-47D | WW2 assets pack | F-86 | Mig-15 | Mig-21 | Mirage 2000C | A-10C II | F-5E | F-16 | F/A-18 | Ka-50 | Combined Arms | FC3 | Nevada | Normandy | Straight of Hormuz | Syria Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dburne Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 Roger, it is only a list allright. Never bothered with checking what it is and how it works, 'cause I've been using my own single profile for all apps from the get go. It is a list, however you can associate a game title with a profile - either one of the defaults or a custom profile you have created. Alternatively you can use exclusive load, which is handy if one uses the same profile for most of their flight sims. I have a custom profile set up for DCS, and I use the Black Shark title in the titles list to associate it with. It loads my custom profile fine for DCS. Don B EVGA Z390 Dark MB | i9 9900k CPU @ 5.1 GHz | Gigabyte 4090 OC | 64 GB Corsair Vengeance 3200 MHz CL16 | Corsair H150i Pro Cooler |Virpil CM3 Stick w/ Alpha Prime Grip 200mm ext| Virpil CM3 Throttle | VPC Rotor TCS Base w/ Alpha-L Grip| Point Control V2|Varjo Aero| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharpeXB Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 TrackIR has never been a out of the box plug n play device, it's always required some tuning and personal adjustments on a per user basis. it's only natural to have to adjust settings and curves when the behavior changes. For myself. With RoF and BoS TrackIR is in fact an out of the box plug and play device. No adjustments needed. The games are designed to work with it perfectly so it doesn't need any customization at all. There's almost no need to recenter it in those games either. Whereas DCS needs it more often. i9-14900KS | ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 HERO | 64GB DDR5 5600MHz | iCUE H150i Liquid CPU Cooler | 24GB GeForce RTX 4090 | Windows 11 Home | 2TB Samsung 980 PRO NVMe | Corsair RM1000x | LG 48GQ900-B 4K OLED Monitor | CH Fighterstick | Ch Pro Throttle | CH Pro Pedals | TrackIR 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagnumHB Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 Doing a quick bit of research shows that the current 1.5.4 implementation is simply incorrect in terms of human factors as far as I can tell. Every worthwhile diagram I could find of normal field of view/line of sight (see 1, 2, 3, 4) indicates that the normal seated line of sight is 15 degrees below horizontal. This agrees with the way the eye works as seen in this diagram depicting the line of sight angled below horizontal. Furthermore, the field of view is wider below (70-80 degrees) horizontal than it is above (50-55 degrees). The previous implementation of centering the view 27 degrees below horizontal seems to be a more valid approximation of the natural line of sight plus some fudging to account for the wider natural field of view below horizontal. Centering the line of sight at horizontal as in 1.5.4 does not seem to reflect the way line of sight actually works. It certainly does not match my experiences in light aircraft being able to both easily see outside and scan the instruments, and I doubt that it matches the A-10 either. Note that in this diagram, the 20 degree field of view below horizontal is specifically emphasized to show the view over the nose. Assuming the 15 degree natural line of sight, it is obvious that the high seating position in the A-10 is optimized to maximize view of the ground, not to have the pilot stare straight out at the top edge of the HUD. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mayo2017 Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 For myself. With RoF and BoS TrackIR is in fact an out of the box plug and play device. No adjustments needed. The games are designed to work with it perfectly so it doesn't need any customization at all. There's almost no need to recenter it in those games either. Whereas DCS needs it more often. It doesn't help that (not sure about 1.5.4) what TrackIR says it's sending to DCS, and what DCS actually shows are different. For example, TrackIR will say that in-game I'm looking 60° to the right, but in DCS I'm actually looking 90° to the right. For me, things like E:D and FSX do exactly what TrackIR says it's doing, while DCS does not. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barao Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 Doing a quick bit of research shows that the current 1.5.4 implementation is simply incorrect in terms of human factors as far as I can tell. Every worthwhile diagram I could find of normal field of view/line of sight (see 1, 2, 3, 4) indicates that the normal seated line of sight is 15 degrees below horizontal. This agrees with the way the eye works as seen in this diagram depicting the line of sight angled below horizontal. Furthermore, the field of view is wider below (70-80 degrees) horizontal than it is above (50-55 degrees). The previous implementation of centering the view 27 degrees below horizontal seems to be a more valid approximation of the natural line of sight plus some fudging to account for the wider natural field of view below horizontal. Centering the line of sight at horizontal as in 1.5.4 does not seem to reflect the way line of sight actually works. It certainly does not match my experiences in light aircraft being able to both easily see outside and scan the instruments, and I doubt that it matches the A-10 either. Note that in this diagram, the 20 degree field of view below horizontal is specifically emphasized to show the view over the nose. Assuming the 15 degree natural line of sight, it is obvious that the high seating position in the A-10 is optimized to maximize view of the ground, not to have the pilot stare straight out at the top edge of the HUD. As I said earlier, I have hundreds of hours in a fighter cockpit, and I agree with you, the current setting of the 1.5.4 version is wrong in my view. But I respect the opinion of those who want to use the new configuration, so I think we should have both options. Dell U2715H 27" IPS 2560x1440 / 60 Hz; Ryzen 7 7700x; 32gb DDR5 6400; B650M Aorus Pro; Water Cooler Arctic liquid freezer II 280 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barao Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 And you are forgetting the AOA when in flight!!!!! Dell U2715H 27" IPS 2560x1440 / 60 Hz; Ryzen 7 7700x; 32gb DDR5 6400; B650M Aorus Pro; Water Cooler Arctic liquid freezer II 280 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dburne Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 I made some adjustments in my Track IR profile and got it better for me, kind of getting used to it now. I still would say I would have preferred the old setup, but maybe after some time I will appreciate the new method better. Don B EVGA Z390 Dark MB | i9 9900k CPU @ 5.1 GHz | Gigabyte 4090 OC | 64 GB Corsair Vengeance 3200 MHz CL16 | Corsair H150i Pro Cooler |Virpil CM3 Stick w/ Alpha Prime Grip 200mm ext| Virpil CM3 Throttle | VPC Rotor TCS Base w/ Alpha-L Grip| Point Control V2|Varjo Aero| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dun_Aenghus Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 Has anyone had any luck trying to fix this vibration view in the cockpit while being unable to zoom out? Frustrating as hell trying to find a solution and the sim is completely unplayable. Only occurs when the TrackIR is up and running. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkateZilla Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 What's your Smooth level at? Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts