whartsell Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 I am really enjoying the C101 and want to use it in its intended role as a trainer. Obviously in order to do that multi-crew needs to be functional. What is the state of multi-crew? what works and what is still WIP? Im very excited to do some primary/secondary training in a plane with western nav systems but cant recommend my "students" buy it for training unless i know its up to the task. Depending on the state of multi-crew I would love to find another c-101 owner to play with multi crew as well Arduino,EOS and Helios Tutorial Static ATC menu mod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vibora Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 (edited) All systems are operative in rear cockpit except navaids, though TACAN needle works. Multicrew in Multiplayer will be only available once AFM is implemented, that's a DCS limitation, there's nothing we can do about it except finishing the AFM. Edited January 11, 2017 by Vibora Roberto "Vibora" Seoane Alas Rojas [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kontiuka Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Just curious ... what is it about the SFM that prevents multi-crew? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vibora Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Just curious ... what is it about the SFM that prevents multi-crew? According to ED, SFM aircrafts are not supposed to have multiple crew. It simply was not coded by ED. Roberto "Vibora" Seoane Alas Rojas [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert31178 Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 That's weird, because the Gazelle has multiplayer and it's flight model is NOT advanced...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilWillis Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Oh we do love a comedian! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Focha Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 Oh we do love a comedian! Who is the comedian? ASUS N552VX | i7-6700HQ @ 2.59GHz | 16 GB DDR3 | NVIDIA GF GTX 950M 4 Gb | 250 Gb SSD | 1 Tb HD SATA II Backup | TIR4 | Microsoft S. FF 2+X52 Throttle+Saitek Pedals | Win 10 64 bits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quent Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 That's weird, because the Gazelle has multiplayer and it's flight model is NOT advanced...... The amount of work that was put into the Gazelle module by the Polychop Simulations team is absolutely tremendous. Its flight model lives up to the EFM standards and requirements, which is basically the third-party equivalent of ED's PFM. Pretty please, know your stuff before dropping false, out of subject information in here. 1 Kind regards, Quentin. [sIGPIC]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic105862_2.gif[/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cichlidfan Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 ...which is basically the third-party equivalent of ED's PFM. Actually, no. An EFM could be anything since all it means is 'made by a 3rd party' Flight Model. There is no innate equivalency between an EFM and EDs PFM ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1 :thumbup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kontiuka Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 Actually, no. An EFM could be anything since all it means is 'made by a 3rd party' Flight Model. There is no innate equivalency between an EFM and EDs PFMAlthough SFM and EFM are different even for a third party. What the C-101 has now is definitely SFM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winterz Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 What is the state of C101's flight model btw? Sorry if it has already been asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kontiuka Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 What is the state of C101's flight model btw? Sorry if it has already been asked.W.I.P. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=159201&page=38#378 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winterz Posted April 1, 2017 Share Posted April 1, 2017 Thanks kontiuka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quent Posted April 13, 2017 Share Posted April 13, 2017 Actually, yes. Labelling a flight model as being an EFM essentially means that given developers had to develop tools, assets in order to reproduce complex and advanced systems or aspects of an aircraft because they couldn't do it within the very restrictive limitations of the standard SFM that is initially provided by Eagle Dynamics. A PFM module is essentially a module that includes an AFM++ modelisation along with an Advanced System Modelling of all electrical, hydraulic, oil systems and avionics in general. Most third-party developers have delivered just that through their own EFM modules so far. Therefore, from what we've been served with, and from what we can observe in the trends, it is safe to say that whenever a module offers an External Flight Model, it will be a third party counterpart of ED's PFM. Kind regards, Quentin. [sIGPIC]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic105862_2.gif[/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts