Cleaner Airports (less clutter objects)

[Johnny_Rico]

Would it be possible to have cleaner airports int the future

 

So it would not have aircraft littered about that just take up space eg:

 

 

[Northstar98]

+1 I personally think it should be an option in the ME to have airfields populated or not

[Gierasimov]

To the contrary...

 

+1 I personally think it should be an option in the ME to have airfields populated or not

 

I think AFBs and airports should more cluttered but with relevant A/C - that's for SP though.

I like the idea of toggle option very much.

 

Each time I want to create a mission I need to start with getting things on the ground - I'd welcome the possibility to pre-populate AFB with A/C, ground services, and personnel (even static or current M4 soldier style). I like NTTR ground "clutter" at the base but I wish it was also included as objects in ME.

 

I agree though those things such as Il 76 with national markings makes no sense if we want to put other nations at given airbase.

[FlightControl]

Have a look to this video:

 

B8fnopjiybg

 

It may help...

 

Demo mission here:

 

https://github.com/FlightControl-Master/MOOSE_MISSIONS/tree/Release/CLA%20-%20CleanUp%20Airbase/CLA-001%20-%20CleanUp%20Airbase

 

Documentation

http://flightcontrol-master.github.io/MOOSE/Documentation/CleanUp.html#CLEANUP_AIRBASE

[Northstar98]

I think AFBs and airports should more cluttered but with relevant A/C - that's for SP though.

I like the idea of toggle option very much.

 

Each time I want to create a mission I need to start with getting things on the ground - I'd welcome the possibility to pre-populate AFB with A/C, ground services, and personnel (even static or current M4 soldier style). I like NTTR ground "clutter" at the base but I wish it was also included as objects in ME.

 

I agree though those things such as Il 76 with national markings makes no sense if we want to put other nations at given airbase.

 

I just think if it's optional, or can be edited, then everyone is happy if you want a more immersive, cluttered airfield, you can have them; if you want a clean slate airfield with nothing on it, you can have it.

 

I can't decide whether or not I like a completely barren airfield or a much more cluttered one because in reality I want both. I have mission ideas where I don't want to operate out of a specific airfield or I want to make an atmosphere of limited resources at airbases; sometimes I want them to be totally bustling with activity and make them look very busy - there are missions where both and everything in between are appropriate.

[discwalker]

+1

[Stryker2000]

What Gierasimov and Lunatic98 said. I love options. And the nationally aligned assets should be a part of any mission build. If an ally is involved like a hypothetical Poland or Egypt, Russian assets make perfect sense. But a US-Euro oriented mission should have all Western hardware around bases. There should be C-17s, 141s or KC-135s sitting around.