Jump to content

NAVAL ASSET PACKS


toni
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey ED, what do you tell me about developing Naval Packs parallel to your Nimitz class and also according with the HB Forrestal + Map ? I t could include the entire AI Air Wings ,CV traffic Pattern / Trap/ Launch capability, several surface scorts depending on the year of comission , etc .

 

More ideas are welcome !

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually:

 

-AI Air Wings: Unknown and not planned. Require build new AI 3D models, texture and animate them (according time and era).

-CV Traffic Pattern: Unknown, can be make changes on DCS W core to better AI traffic, and can require add new functionality to airport / carrier use.

-Trap: On progress, some new animations and landing physics has improved on some aircraft's (Su-33 / F/A-18C) to carrier landing. Surely we see more improvements in the future.

-Launch capability: Planned. ED team talk about new launch physics on carriers with the incoming CV-70 / Kutnesov optional DLCs, waiting for news.

-Surface escort: Unknown, similar to carrier air wings AI units, require build new 3D models and build a new array of features to fill big holes on sea environment (AAW, ASW, ASuW warfare, Formations, Picket duty, Underway replenishment (VERTREP, CONREP)) and a long of features, normally on the Wishlist section.

 

Surely the future HB Forrestal can be improve with new carrier features, but some AI as carrier operations (parking, deck aircraft movement, hangar, elevator operations, deck crew, CAG), and a long etc has actually unknown.

  • Like 1

More news to the front

My Rig: AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Eight-Core  3.60 GHz / Crosshair VI Hero / Corsair H115i / 48 GB DDR4 RAM Vergance RGB Pro / GTX-1080 8 GB RAM / HD 1Tb / SSD 2Tb/2x1Tb / Warthog / 2 MDF / TFPR / Track Ir V / Logitech G633

DCS: Roadmap (unofficial): https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=116893

DCS: List of Vacant models: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=4076891#post4076891

Silver_Dragon Youtube

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually:

 

 

-Launch capability: Planned. ED team talk about new launch physics on carriers with the incoming CV-70 / Kutnesov optional DLCs, waiting for news.

 

Hi is ED going to charge for the new carriers ?



 

Water cooled i9-9900K | Maximus Code XI MB | RTX3090  | 64GB | HP Reverb G2 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi is ED going to charge for the new carriers ?

 

Unknown actually.

More news to the front

My Rig: AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Eight-Core  3.60 GHz / Crosshair VI Hero / Corsair H115i / 48 GB DDR4 RAM Vergance RGB Pro / GTX-1080 8 GB RAM / HD 1Tb / SSD 2Tb/2x1Tb / Warthog / 2 MDF / TFPR / Track Ir V / Logitech G633

DCS: Roadmap (unofficial): https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=116893

DCS: List of Vacant models: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=4076891#post4076891

Silver_Dragon Youtube

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi is ED going to charge for the new carriers ?

 

hopefully not, MP segregation is bad enough with one asset pack

  • Like 1

METAR weather for DCS World missions

 

Guide to help out new DCS MOOSE Users -> HERE

Havoc Company Dedicated server info Connect IP: 94.23.215.203

SRS enabled - freqs - Main = 243, A2A = 244, A2G = 245

Please contact me HERE if you have any server feedback or METAR issues/requests

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem paying for stuff I can drive / fly

BUT I have a problem paying for stuff that should be part of the core sim

 

The fact that there is still no dedicated server and people hosting are expected

to pay for copies of DLC just to host a "dedicated" server for others to play on is not good, no one else does this

METAR weather for DCS World missions

 

Guide to help out new DCS MOOSE Users -> HERE

Havoc Company Dedicated server info Connect IP: 94.23.215.203

SRS enabled - freqs - Main = 243, A2A = 244, A2G = 245

Please contact me HERE if you have any server feedback or METAR issues/requests

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, this is a sticking point with a lot of people. I can see why we'd have to pay for Naval packs. This is a niche sim in a shrinking market - notice how many (few) flight sims are for sale anymore. The work required to bring any ship to life is massive, and then there's the carrier itself. It's a floating naval base. And the only reason they can operate is because they're surrounded by a tidy flotilla of support/defense ships and subs. To make that all work, you have the workload equivalent of a few squadrons of aircraft. All the sensors, communications, integrated weapons systems... that's a lot of work.

 

If we want more product to grow DCS from Eagle D and partners, we're going to have to pay for some stuff, particularly if it's work intensive. Dedicated servers is another bone to pick...

Team Red wish MiG-23/27, Su-17/22, Su-24, Su-30 C, Yak-130, Tu-16, Tu-95, Tu-22M

 

Team Blue want AH-1W, AH-64, Alphajet, A-4, Jaguar, Tornado, F-16, A-6, A-7, F-111, F-15E, B-52, B-1B

Link to comment
Share on other sites

until we have a proper dedicated server, hosters will still have to pay ....

METAR weather for DCS World missions

 

Guide to help out new DCS MOOSE Users -> HERE

Havoc Company Dedicated server info Connect IP: 94.23.215.203

SRS enabled - freqs - Main = 243, A2A = 244, A2G = 245

Please contact me HERE if you have any server feedback or METAR issues/requests

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Johnny_Rico, I totally get you. We can lobby for ED to make all assets embedded in the sim, but we're at their mercy on this. Maybe a thread/poll on the subject?

Team Red wish MiG-23/27, Su-17/22, Su-24, Su-30 C, Yak-130, Tu-16, Tu-95, Tu-22M

 

Team Blue want AH-1W, AH-64, Alphajet, A-4, Jaguar, Tornado, F-16, A-6, A-7, F-111, F-15E, B-52, B-1B

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...