Jump to content

Nightvision?


Nosferatuwhisky 1-1

Recommended Posts

I’ve not seen anything in relation to having noghtvision like it seems the AV-8 has.

 

If u're talking about NFLIR - then yes, Hornet provides NFLIR video on the HUD.

In case, if ATFLIR is present.

 

As I remember, somebody from ED TEAM already told in ATFLIR topic, that it's planned.

Might be wrong.


Edited by ICS_Vortex

PC: i9-10850K ~5.2GHz / Asus Rog Strix H490 Gaming, Asus GTX1080 Rog Strix Gaming OC, HyperX Fury RGB 32Gb RAM 3200MHz, SSD 512Gb, HDD 1Tb, Windows 10 x64. 2 x Samsung Curved 32" 

VirpilControls software engineer

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This might be dumb but... what's the difference between ATFLIR, NFLIR, LANTIRN, etc.

 

I know what they stand for, but not sure what the real differences are.

 

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as far as I know we will get nightvision, there was much ado about the lack of black panels in early development pics, which has been rectified by now

 

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3269888&postcount=26

 

and apart from that I think it has been confirmed very early on in development

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

"DCS World is the main public build, it has nothing to do with being stable" -Bignewy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as far as I know we will get nightvision, there was much ado about the lack of black panels in early development pics, which has been rectified by now

 

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3269888&postcount=26

 

There is a lot more to the NVG compatibility than just the black wall panels - the entire cockpit(new HUD, DDIs, MPCD, panel and stand-by instrument lighting etc) was modified for this with the Night Attack version(from Lot 12 and up).

JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This might be dumb but... what's the difference between ATFLIR, NFLIR, LANTIRN, etc.

 

I know what they stand for, but not sure what the real differences are.

 

 

Thanks.

 

Older targeting pods. Lantirn was a US Air force Targeting pod introduced in the 80s ( was also used by the US navy on the F14B of the late 80s and theF14D)

 

whilst the Nitehawk pod was a US navy TGP for the Hornet of 80s- 90s period. Worse quality than Lantirn. BAd enough than in 2003 OIF Hornets relied on Tomcats when possible with thier Lantirns for targeting and confirmation that the target was indeed an enemy.

 

 

 

The AtFLir was introduced into service in the 2000s . is currently in Service. Its of the same generation and comparable technology to the Lightening 2 TGP that the A10C has ( which replaced the lantirn and other aircraft like the F15E and F16C)

 

Atlfir is slightly worse but of comparable technology and Generation of the Lightening 2 in Use by the USAF and USMC. Its capabilties are said to be a "quantum leap" over the Nitehawk.

 

Build:

 

Windows 10 64 bit Pro

Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD,  WD 1TB HDD

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The AtFLir was introduced into service in the 2000s . is currently in Service. Its of the same generation and comparable technology to the Lightening 2 TGP that the A10C has ( which replaced the lantirn and other aircraft like the F15E and F16C)

 

Atlfir is slightly worse but of comparable technology and Generation of the Lightening 2

 

Lockheed Martin = LANTIRN -> SNIPER

Raytheon = ATFLIR

Rafael/NorthropGrumman = LITENING

 

what does "worse" here mean?


Edited by probad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lockheed Martin = LANTIRN -> SNIPER

Raytheon = ATFLIR

Rafael/NorthropGrumman = LITENING

 

what does "worse" here mean?

 

This was a comment from a concluded report of a study between the l2 and atflir that the usmc conducted in 2006.

 

http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA498288


Edited by Kev2go

 

Build:

 

Windows 10 64 bit Pro

Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD,  WD 1TB HDD

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Older targeting pods. Lantirn was a US Air force Targeting pod introduced in the 80s ( was also used by the US navy on the F14B of the late 80s and theF14D)

 

whilst the Nitehawk pod was a US navy TGP for the Hornet of 80s- 90s period. Worse quality than Lantirn. BAd enough than in 2003 OIF Hornets relied on Tomcats when possible with thier Lantirns for targeting and confirmation that the target was indeed an enemy.

 

 

 

The AtFLir was introduced into service in the 2000s . is currently in Service. Its of the same generation and comparable technology to the Lightening 2 TGP that the A10C has ( which replaced the lantirn and other aircraft like the F15E and F16C)

 

Atlfir is slightly worse but of comparable technology and Generation of the Lightening 2 in Use by the USAF and USMC. Its capabilties are said to be a "quantum leap" over the Nitehawk.

Thanks man!

 

Enviado desde mi Moto Z Play mediante Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a lot more to the NVG compatibility than just the black wall panels - the entire cockpit(new HUD, DDIs, MPCD, panel and stand-by instrument lighting etc) was modified for this with the Night Attack version(from Lot 12 and up).

 

that is so interesting, please tell me more and be as specific as possible

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

"DCS World is the main public build, it has nothing to do with being stable" -Bignewy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pure fighter guys don't use them. The F-15E community yeah, peace they're air 2 ground, but the F-15C doesn't need it.

 

No one dogfights at night, it's just not safe.

 

That's incorrect. Many squadrons receive training on them for the F-15C. At least one, I can prove with a statement directly from the USAF.

 

http://www.jble.af.mil/News/Features/Display/Article/260998/

 

"The F-15 pilots face a different challenge. Their aircraft was not designed for night vision, so lights in the F-15 cockpit must be turned off. The smallest sliver of light can white out the goggles.

 

“You have to either turn off or tape over the lights you don’t need,” Captain Nyman said. “You also have limited depth perception with night vision goggles.”"

If you aim for the sky, you will never hit the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that is so interesting, please tell me more and be as specific as possible

 

Well I don't know if I can be that more specific, but if you look at the initial F-18C(Lot 10 and 11) cockpit as it was introduced in 1987, you will be hard pressed to find much difference from an F-18A . It got the IFEI(integrated fuel and engine indicator) and new style UFC, but other than that it looked just like the F-18A cockpit.

 

With the introduction of the Night Attack version(Lot 12 from 1989), the F-18 got a much improved ability to conduct strike missions at night. In this connection the cockpit got a major upgrade - a lot of which had to do with NVG compatibility. In terms of displays, It got a new raster HUD, tri-color DDIs and the MPCD - all NVG compatible. The cockpit lighting system was modified for NVG compatible illumination of panels and standby gauges(certified for NVG use). On the INTR LT panel there is a switch that, when set to "NVG", keeps manual illumination adjustment within a NVG compatible regime(and some of the dials were changed with odd shapes - I assume in order to be able to find the right ones by feel). There is a storage box for the NVGs at the rear of RH console...and the wall covers were painted black :) .

JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's incorrect. Many squadrons receive training on them for the F-15C. At least one, I can prove with a statement directly from the USAF.

 

"The F-15 pilots face a different challenge. Their aircraft was not designed for night vision..."

 

No but the F-18C version being developed for DCS was, so that alone also makes it more needed for this than for the F-15C.

 

I am sure that you could find use of NVGs on pure fighter aircraft - e.g. for air refuelling at night, but USMC_Trev is right that its much more relevant for strike fighters such as the F/A-18C. I recall reading that F-18C squadrons are often specialising in particular tasks and that those which are operating primarily in the fighter role seldom carry the NVGs unless the specific mission calls for it.

JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

There is a way to move out NVG from the center of the screen?

like it is for the torch

 

it is very unconfortable to center the NVG with the line of sight because you have to focus the target with the center of the screen expecially when you have more then one screen it is impossible


Edited by Ares63
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...