Jump to content

Chances of getting a mid 1990's JA 37D


Freeroamer

Recommended Posts

That would be awesome!

 

But I guess it's as much work for Heatblur creating the fighter version as it was for SAAB building it back in the 70s/80s (The work of "converting" the AJ 37 into the JA 37 was underestimated grossly).

i7-7700K @ 4.9 GHz | Gigabyte Aorus Geforce GTX 1080 Ti | 32 GB DDR4 Corsair Vengeance @ 2400 MHz (2800 OC) | Asus Strix Z270E Gaming | Samsung 970 EVO M.2 SSD 1 TB | Samsung 960 EVO M.2 SSD 500 GB | WD NAS Red 2TB SATA3 | Corsair Cooling Hydro Series H80i v2 | Thrustmaster Hotas Warthog | Saitek PRO rudder pedals | Valve Index

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some systems that are in the JAS are also to be found in the Gripen and thus classiefied. We're maybe getting an AI model of the JAS though.

 

Well technically, most RWR's and ECM systems in DCS are also very very classified. And A-10C, while extremely accurate has (from what I have read) around 80-90% simulation of the real systems.

 

So if there is only a couple of classified systems, it might be doable. Actually I think that an early Gripen also would be possible. There are plenty of information, even online you can find studies about it's screen symbology etc.

 

But an older JA37 is more likely. Or a Draken :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the development of a JA-37 or even a Gripen for DCS is pretty much up to Saab. Heatblur is definitely interested:

:D

Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

 

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

 

Tornado3 small.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some systems that are in the JAS are also to be found in the Gripen and thus classiefied.

 

We're maybe getting an AI model of the JAS though.

 

I was thinking of this post when I came across this:"

And against the Saab Gripen and Dassault Rafale?

Gripen is a bit of an unknown quantity against modern air superiority machines because it takes a fundamentally different approach to survivability. Whilst in traditional DACT exercises, Typhoon pilots have often referred to the Gripen as ‘cannon-fodder’ due to its inferior thrust-to-weight ratio, speed, agility and armament, in the few cases where the Gripen has ‘come to play’ with its full electronic warfare capabilities, it has given Typhoons very nasty shocks. Against the Su-35S, Gripen would rely on the cutting edge EW capabilities which Saab builds the Gripen (especially the new E/F) around to hide the aircraft from the sensors of the Russian jets in much the same way as the Raptor relies on x-band stealth. These EW capabilities are so highly classified that there is simply no way to assess their effectiveness in the public domain. Having said that, RAF pilots who I have talked to with experience of the Saab fighter’s EW teeth first hand say that the ability of the aircraft to get alarmingly close without detection thanks entirely to EW is very impressive."

 

 

From: https://hushkit.net/2016/03/17/su-35-versus-typhoon-analysis-from-rusis-justin-bronk/

Kozality

Vargar 1-2

107th JAS

http://throughtheinferno.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not as far as I know.

 

Well, I do know. The JA 37 was a whole new development in terms of radar, avionics and other on-board systems. It was an almost completely digital aircraft compared to the other Viggen versions.

 

In fact, the leap between the JA 37 and the AJ/SF/SH 37 is greater than the leap between the JA 37 and the JAS 39.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

woudl be fun I think, but I believe that heatblur wouldn't create another version of the 'same' aircraft (opposed to having planned it in the first place - see f-14 a / b).

 

I think it would be best if we stick to the 'good old' viggen, which is a beast in my eye ;)

sigpic.png.4d2403c54e341ae5cf45e3309e87cb2c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do have a point. However, at least a fighter variant would be nice, which from research seems to have been equipped with the Robot71 which is basically a Skyflash, this along with the integrated gun and radar would make it somewhat equivalent to a mirage in terms of weapons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how much fun it would actually be in terms of a dogfight though. While Saab made some aerodynamic and performance improvements, nothing was done to the intakes or engine for the most part, and so it would have the same high-AoA restrictions as the AJS37.

 

In some ways I see the JA37 as being similar to the Tornado F3: Decent long-range weapon system, but comprised up close.

Kozality

Vargar 1-2

107th JAS

http://throughtheinferno.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me it would be attractive as well. I believe this machine would be quite potent and nearly a 4th gen-fighter. Nevertheless it would be interesting how the selling would be done? Would it be a standalone plugin? Would it be a 'giveaway' for all those who own the AJS?

And even then, it would appear that DCS would grow into some sort of IL2, which had an immense number of the same plane - in all variants possible.

 

However it would add another fighter to a higher level, which is indeed good - a mirage needs some opponents i believe ;)

sigpic.png.4d2403c54e341ae5cf45e3309e87cb2c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how much fun it would actually be in terms of a dogfight though. While Saab made some aerodynamic and performance improvements, nothing was done to the intakes or engine for the most part, and so it would have the same high-AoA restrictions as the AJS37.

 

In some ways I see the JA37 as being similar to the Tornado F3: Decent long-range weapon system, but comprised up close.

 

Well the RM8B engine is quite different from the RM8A, and re-designed with the compressor stalls in mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well we are getting an AI JA-35

 

J35nr12.jpg

MY SYSTEM SPECS: Hardware Intel pentium 3 @ 800 MHz, 256 Mb RAM, Geforce 2 64Mb, Dell screen 1024x768 + Microsoft sidewhiner joystick + TrackIR 2 + TrackClitPro SOFTWARE: Microsoft Windows 98, Noice Attack & VIASAT PRO, SnackView

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are plenty of information, even online you can find studies about it's screen symbology etc.

 

It doesn't matter what information there is out. Developers are required legally to have contract with the manufacturer for the aircraft and its systems. ED requires this as it is a legal nightmare if they would go to release something the copyrights etc owning party is not with them...

i7-8700k, 32GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 2x 2080S SLI 8GB, Oculus Rift S.

i7-8700k, 16GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 1080Ti 11GB, 27" 4K, 65" HDR 4K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well we are getting an AI JA-35

Yes, that is clear. But before they announced the AI JA-35 they talked about making a AI JA-37 already. I wonder if this is still going to happen?

 

Edit: Nvm, a quick forum search answered my question: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3287520&postcount=10

Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

 

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

 

Tornado3 small.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but ... don't get me wrong, it would be muuuuuch better if it wasn't an AI JA.

What's my purpose of an AI if I'm flying online?

It's the cockpit which is tempting ;)

 

With the Draken it's the same, I want to fly this thing, not watch it fly ...

sigpic.png.4d2403c54e341ae5cf45e3309e87cb2c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but ... don't get me wrong, it would be muuuuuch better if it wasn't an AI JA.

What's my purpose of an AI if I'm flying online?

It's the cockpit which is tempting ;)

 

With the Draken it's the same, I want to fly this thing, not watch it fly ...

 

Sure, but creating a full DCS module requires a lot of work, time and money, unlike an AI aircraft.

Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

 

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

 

Tornado3 small.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...