AeriaGloria Posted April 18, 2021 Share Posted April 18, 2021 On 4/12/2021 at 10:51 AM, IkarusC42B Pilot said: You missed the point completly. The point is there arent going to see any on the camera because theyre barely pushing the plane. ....bonus 720p gang It was not air show video. I have no idea where the actual comment was but Deka asked their sources at Chengdu/actual JF-17 pilots and they said the pilot can’t notice any wing flexing during maneuvers because the flexing is so little, and is thus not worth spending resources on. I’m pretty sure the case is exactly the same with the A-10 never getting wing flexing with it’s updated A-10C II model in DCS. I believe it was an SME on here that said there is no noticeable bend in the A-10 wing under any conditions. It’s not impossible 1 Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kotor633 Posted April 23, 2021 Share Posted April 23, 2021 When does Deka finally plan to publish an appropriate user manual for the JF-17? 1 ************************************** DCS World needs the Panavia Tornado! Really! ************************************** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killkenny1 Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 (edited) On 2/1/2021 at 2:24 AM, AeriaGloria said: There is a coin given to people who attended the maiden flight of block 3 and it shows a cheek pod, I’ll see if I can find the photo of it I saved Well apparently it is true. Edited April 28, 2021 by killkenny1 НЕТ ВОЙНЕ! Gib full-fi Su-27 or MiG-29 plz! AMD R7 3700X|32GB DDR4 RAM|Gigabyte RTX2070S Gaming OC|2TB NVMe SDD + 1TB SSD + 2TBB + 1TB HDD|Dell P3421W|Windows 10 Pro x64 TM Warthog|MFG Crosswind|Samsung Odyssey+|TrackIR 5 Modules: Mirage F1|Mi-24P|JF-17|F/A-18C|F-14A/B|F-5E|M-2000C|MiG-21bis|L-39|Yak-52|FC3|Supercarrier || Terrains: Persian Gulf|NTTR|Normandy|Syria Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampiresquid Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 Has anyone else noticed lower refresh rate in the JF17 hud? This patch.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razo+r Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 5 minutes ago, Vampiresquid said: Has anyone else noticed lower refresh rate in the JF17 hud? This patch.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahad458 Posted May 7, 2021 Share Posted May 7, 2021 On 5/6/2021 at 12:37 AM, Vampiresquid said: Has anyone else noticed lower refresh rate in the JF17 hud? This patch.. Yes i have also noticed in the latest update, pitch ladder refresh rate is smooth as before but airspeed and altimeter reading have now very very low refresh rates, i doubt if in real life Jeff has low refresh rates on HUD coz they doesn't look very good at all :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJQCN101 Posted May 12, 2021 Share Posted May 12, 2021 (edited) On 2/14/2021 at 1:54 AM, Zhivuchiy said: I wonder. Am I the only one who feels that FBW/drag should be tuned? Jeff is the only plane which I struggle to pull out from a dive and it does not bleed energy while turning as other planes, for example f-16. Otherwise a beatiful little bird which is fun to fly. I didn't spot any anomalies in CL CD curves or the testing results of SEP, and the FBW is line by line coded according to the real graph. Are you accelerating above M0.85, since that would have your g-limit reduced to 6g. You would be mostly flying at a lower AOA than an F-16 due to it's lower wing loading, thus a lower induces drag. (Unless you load it up.) Other than that the CL and CD themselves at subsonic regions are roughly on-par with an F-16, with less wing reference area. Being limited to 6g means you'll be pulling very little AOA, hence the impression of not bleeding energy. Anyways we need the following info to check if SEP at any specific point is correct or not: airspeed bleed rate, mach number, G, AOA, altitude, fuel and loadout, power settings, ambient temperature. Edited May 12, 2021 by LJQCN101 EFM / FCS developer, Deka Ironwork Simulations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zhivuchiy Posted May 12, 2021 Share Posted May 12, 2021 (edited) 4 часа назад, LJQCN101 сказал: I didn't spot any anomalies in CL CD curves or the testing results of SEP, and the FBW is line by line coded according to the real graph. Are you accelerating above M0.85, since that would have your g-limit reduced to 6g. You would be mostly flying at a lower AOA than an F-16 due to it's lower wing loading, thus a lower induces drag. (Unless you load it up.) Other than that the CL and CD themselves at subsonic regions are roughly on-par with an F-16, with less wing reference area. Being limited to 6g means you'll be pulling very little AOA, hence the impression of not bleeding energy. Anyways we need the following info to check if SEP at any specific point is correct or not: airspeed bleed rate, mach number, G, AOA, altitude, fuel and loadout, power settings, ambient temperature. Thank you, in 2.7 I do not see this behavior anymore. BTW: Are you familiar with this tool : https://dcs.silver.ru 2.7 data is still not there yet, though. Edited May 12, 2021 by Zhivuchiy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J20Stronk Posted May 12, 2021 Share Posted May 12, 2021 9 hours ago, LJQCN101 said: I didn't spot any anomalies in CL CD curves or the testing results of SEP, and the FBW is line by line coded according to the real graph. Are you accelerating above M0.85, since that would have your g-limit reduced to 6g. You would be mostly flying at a lower AOA than an F-16 due to it's lower wing loading, thus a lower induces drag. (Unless you load it up.) Other than that the CL and CD themselves at subsonic regions are roughly on-par with an F-16, with less wing reference area. Being limited to 6g means you'll be pulling very little AOA, hence the impression of not bleeding energy. Anyways we need the following info to check if SEP at any specific point is correct or not: airspeed bleed rate, mach number, G, AOA, altitude, fuel and loadout, power settings, ambient temperature. The only thing bothering me is the absurdly slow spool rate of the RD-93. Is it really this slow on the real plane? It takes roughly 6-7 seconds to go from 72% RPM to 80%. And the smaller the RPM change increment, the slower the spool rate. Basically, there appears to be some really bad RPM Smoothing Curve similar to Mouse Acceleration in FPS video games. Smaller increments like 75% -> 80% have a spool rate of ~1%/sec, while 75% -> 95% has a spool rate of ~5%/sec. (Which is still really slow) This RPM curve makes it really difficult to land and AAR, or pick up speed after a dive bombing maneuver. Again, I don't know if this is correct for the DEEC to apply a really slow curve to the throttle, but I doubt anyone would use an engine that has such sluggish throttle response times. It should also be noted, the MiG-29s RD-33 spools much faster at about 8%/s to 12%/s, and it doesn't seem to have that anoying curve affecting the small throttle increments. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marko.H Posted May 14, 2021 Share Posted May 14, 2021 On 5/6/2021 at 12:07 AM, Vampiresquid said: Has anyone else noticed lower refresh rate in the JF17 hud? This patch.. The refresh rate has reduced... and about the speed and altitude ladders, it has got a 4-5ish frame per second update now, instead of the smooth rising or lowering ladder we had on the sides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoikiy Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 (edited) why on this episode SD10 turn from the target? it is okay? AIM-120 always continue track the target even if rocket lose energy Edited May 19, 2021 by Stoikiy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sorcer3r Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 Hi, is there a chance that we can get white phosphorus rockets for the lau-68 pod ? [sIGPIC]http://i1293.photobucket.com/albums/b582/sorcerer17/sorcf16-b_zpsycmnwuay.gif[/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MK84 Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 Interesting JF-17 Block III patch with what looks like chin-mounted TGP. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paco2002 Posted September 22, 2021 Share Posted September 22, 2021 20 hours ago, MK84 said: Interesting JF-17 Block III patch with what looks like chin-mounted TGP. Indeed it is, and also PL-10 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirrah Posted October 14, 2021 Share Posted October 14, 2021 So... When will the JF-17 be converted from a remote controlled aircraft to an aircraft with a pilot inside the cockpit? Has Deka at any point announced or confirmed that they are working on a pilot body? And (I know, small chance) did they give any eta? I'm getting to a point where I'm ready to learn (purchase) a new module and I have a few of them in mind. Unfortunately, non of them have a pilot body (yet) and I decided to stop buying modules that won't get a pilot body. So I wonder, is Deka developing arms and legs? System specs: i7-8700K @stock speed - GTX 1080TI @ stock speed - AsRock Extreme4 Z370 - 32GB DDR4 @3GHz- 500GB SSD - 2TB nvme - 650W PSU HP Reverb G1 v2 - Saitek Pro pedals - TM Warthog HOTAS - TM F/A-18 Grip - TM Cougar HOTAS (NN-Dan mod) & (throttle standalone mod) - VIRPIL VPC Rotor TCS Plus with ALPHA-L grip - Pointctrl & aux banks <-- must have for VR users!! - Andre's SimShaker Jetpad - Fully adjustable DIY playseat - VA+VAICOM ~ That nuke might not have been the best of ideas, Sir... the enemy is furious ~ GUMMBAH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinchus2009 Posted November 6, 2021 Share Posted November 6, 2021 On 10/14/2021 at 11:46 AM, sirrah said: So... When will the JF-17 be converted from a remote controlled aircraft to an aircraft with a pilot inside the cockpit? Has Deka at any point announced or confirmed that they are working on a pilot body? And (I know, small chance) did they give any eta? I'm getting to a point where I'm ready to learn (purchase) a new module and I have a few of them in mind. Unfortunately, non of them have a pilot body (yet) and I decided to stop buying modules that won't get a pilot body. So I wonder, is Deka developing arms and legs? Why not focus on better request.. DO you look a lot at the pilot's legs and body while flying? I would recommend looking outside the cokpit or the instruments 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirrah Posted November 6, 2021 Share Posted November 6, 2021 (edited) 22 hours ago, Tinchus2009 said: Why not focus on better request.. DO you look a lot at the pilot's legs and body while flying? I would recommend looking outside the cokpit or the instruments Well yes, in VR I constantly see my legs. VR has quite a large vertical fov (compared to pancake) I stopped flying the Viper, because constantly seeing those empty gaps where my legs should be, is so immensely fake and (sorry for using the "i-word") immersion killing. I rather wait for the pilot body to be added, so the cockpit feels as cramped as it does irl Hense I wondered if anything was planned/on the horizon for the Jeff Edited November 7, 2021 by sirrah 1 System specs: i7-8700K @stock speed - GTX 1080TI @ stock speed - AsRock Extreme4 Z370 - 32GB DDR4 @3GHz- 500GB SSD - 2TB nvme - 650W PSU HP Reverb G1 v2 - Saitek Pro pedals - TM Warthog HOTAS - TM F/A-18 Grip - TM Cougar HOTAS (NN-Dan mod) & (throttle standalone mod) - VIRPIL VPC Rotor TCS Plus with ALPHA-L grip - Pointctrl & aux banks <-- must have for VR users!! - Andre's SimShaker Jetpad - Fully adjustable DIY playseat - VA+VAICOM ~ That nuke might not have been the best of ideas, Sir... the enemy is furious ~ GUMMBAH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tippis Posted November 6, 2021 Share Posted November 6, 2021 Also, having your knee board on… you know… your knee is quite nice. 1 ❧ ❧ Inside you are two wolves. One cannot land; the other shoots friendlies. You are a Goon. ❧ ❧ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger01 Posted November 20, 2021 Share Posted November 20, 2021 Any news for the Block III and/or HMD? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IcedVenom Posted November 20, 2021 Share Posted November 20, 2021 5 hours ago, Roger01 said: Any news for the Block III and/or HMD? Sadly Deka is really quiet as of late. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike_Romeo Posted November 20, 2021 Share Posted November 20, 2021 (edited) 8 hours ago, Roger01 said: Any news for the Block III and/or HMD? We wont get Block 3 since its to classified and its not even in service yet. HMD is done but not implemeted because the Pakistan airforce dont have it in their Block 1/2 planes. It was intruduced with the Block 3 which we wont get but they also said if they add the HMD to block I/II, they will add them too. Edited November 20, 2021 by Mike_Romeo 1 My skins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger01 Posted November 20, 2021 Share Posted November 20, 2021 Ho thanks for that. And the JF-17B? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AeriaGloria Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 22 hours ago, Roger01 said: Ho thanks for that. And the JF-17B? JF-17B only makes sense if we had block 2, and even then not totally easy as JF-17B is more like Block 2.5 with its 3 axis fly by optics and greater amount of composites. Would require quite an upgrade. There is alot before it could even be a block 2 in DCS, OBOGS, dedicated datalink radio, KLJ-7v2, increased payload limit, greater composites, LED landing lights, I always miss a few things. And JF-17B also has small fuel tank in vertical stabilizer, with a higher swept vertical stabilizer and bigger cockpit would require re doing the EFM. Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shimmergloom667 Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 So, I was wondering: since MGRS / UTM is the gift that keeps on giving - anyone knows if the RL Jeff can handle MGRS / UTM coordinate entry, and if so, has there been any word on that by the Devs? i7 - 9700K | 32 GB DDR4 3200 | RTX 2080 | VKB Gunfighter Mk II /w MCG Pro | Virpil T-50CM2 Throttle | TrackIR 5 | VKB Mk. IV AJS-37 | A/V-8B | A-10C | F-14A/B | F-16C | F-18C | F-86F | FC3 | JF-17 | Ka-50 | L-39 | Mi-8 | MiG-15bis | MiG-19 | MiG-21bis | M2000-C | P-51D | Spitfire LF Mk. IX | UH-1H Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pekins Posted January 23, 2022 Share Posted January 23, 2022 Noticed the JSOWs in the Jeff get really bad release range compared to the FA18's, that is flying angels 30 mach 0.9 ish, mission I did today I remember getting in the release line about 27 nm from the target wheres in the FA18 I can easily get 40+, is that normal or am I missing something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts