Owl Dynamic Posted January 29, 2019 Share Posted January 29, 2019 In the Russian localization of DCS World with Flaming Cliffs 3, open the settings menu and open the control tab for specific air planes. You see a few inaccuracies. 1. MiG-29C to МиГ-29С or MiG-29S, not a mix of both. Better entirely in Russian. 2. МиГ-29 to МиГ-29А. That is how it appears in the mission editor. 3. МиГ-29G to MiG-29G, because it is the export version anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DmitriKozlowsky Posted January 29, 2019 Share Posted January 29, 2019 Cyrilic C is English S MIG-29C is as correct as MIG-29S S C variant designation is 'Sovremeignny', which Russian for Modernized. M is for 'moderny' is Russian variation of Mid Life Update. T extension is Thrust Vectoring. Thus MIG-29SMT is MIG-29 modernized and updated equipped with thrust vectoring engines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AeriaGloria Posted January 29, 2019 Share Posted January 29, 2019 (edited) I always heard T in MiG-29SMT was for ‘Toplivo,’ for fuel. Referring to the hunchback Edit: actually I read it in a book, Encyclopedia for Modern Aircraft by Paul Eden, 2004. AFAIK no operational MiG-29 has had TV, very unfortunate. Unless they are doing so to the MiG-35 and not telling anyone. Edited January 29, 2019 by AeriaGloria Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
draconus Posted January 29, 2019 Share Posted January 29, 2019 In the Russian localization of DCS World with Flaming Cliffs 3, open the settings menu and open the control tab for specific air planes. You see a few inaccuracies. 1. MiG-29C to МиГ-29С or MiG-29S, not a mix of both. Better entirely in Russian. 2. МиГ-29 to МиГ-29А. That is how it appears in the mission editor. 3. МиГ-29G to MiG-29G, because it is the export version anyway. These are valid points, perhaps would be better placed here: https://forums.eagle.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=328 Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX3060 Rift S T16000M TWCS TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owl Dynamic Posted January 29, 2019 Author Share Posted January 29, 2019 (edited) Cyrilic C is English S MIG-29C is as correct as MIG-29S The Russian named C300 is also called S300 in English. So better to have it consistent. A quick look at Wikipedia says MiG-29S, so I would assume this is the broader consensus. Also googling MiG-29C gives about 300k search answers versus 1,4m for MiG-29S. perhaps would be better placed here: https://forums.eagle.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=328 The russian forum does not have subcategories for bug reports and I thought it would be more finely sorted in here. Edited January 29, 2019 by Owl Dynamic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dudikoff Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 (edited) S C variant designation is 'Sovremeignny', which Russian for Modernized. M is for 'moderny' is Russian variation of Mid Life Update. T extension is Thrust Vectoring. Thus MIG-29SMT is MIG-29 modernized and updated equipped with thrust vectoring engines. Thrust Vectoring? Of course not, that's on the MiG-29OVT which is the converted MiG-29M prototype fitted with thrust vectoring and the only MiG-29 variant to have had those. T in SMT most probably does stand for extra fuel, e.g. like MiG-21SMT with it's grossly enlarged spine containing extra fuel compared to the originating MiG-21SM variant. Edited January 31, 2019 by Dudikoff i386DX40@42 MHz w/i387 CP, 4 MB RAM (8*512 kB), Trident 8900C 1 MB w/16-bit RAMDAC ISA, Quantum 340 MB UDMA33, SB 16, DOS 6.22 w/QEMM + Win3.11CE, Quickshot 1btn 2axis, Numpad as hat. 2 FPH on a good day, 1 FPH avg. DISCLAIMER: My posts are still absolutely useless. Just finding excuses not to learn the F-14 (HB's Swansong?). Annoyed by my posts? Please consider donating. Once the target sum is reached, I'll be off to somewhere nice I promise not to post from. I'd buy that for a dollar! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DmitriKozlowsky Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 For land systems, S is 'systema', as in System System-300. Russians often use term complex , or komplex using Cyrillic. The describe the entire system of actual vehicle and associated equipment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DmitriKozlowsky Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 Ehh.. You may be right. I may have switched O with T and vice versa. Hope nobody got hurt as result. However S & M designation are correct as far as I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frostie Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 In the Russian localization of DCS World with Flaming Cliffs 3, open the settings menu and open the control tab for specific air planes. You see a few inaccuracies. 1. MiG-29C to МиГ-29С or MiG-29S, not a mix of both. Better entirely in Russian. 2. МиГ-29 to МиГ-29А. That is how it appears in the mission editor. 3. МиГ-29G to MiG-29G, because it is the export version anyway. I'm not so sure about your first point. MiG29S (9.13) is FulcrumC hence MiG29C. MiG29 (9.12A) is FulcrumA hence MiG29A. English speaking variants is is either MiG29 + MiG29S (Russian) or MiG29A + MiG29C (NATO). "[51☭] FROSTIE" #55 51st PVO "BISONS" Fastest MiG pilot in the world - TCR'10 https://100kiap.org Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owl Dynamic Posted January 31, 2019 Author Share Posted January 31, 2019 (edited) I'm not so sure about your first point. MiG29S (9.13) is FulcrumC hence MiG29C. The NATO Codename does not have to correspond to its actual name. Counter-example: MiG-29K (9-31) is Codenamed Fulcrum-D. Seriously, it is MiG-29S (Latin) unless somebody would kindly post a link to a credible, significant source which says otherwise. MiG-29S (1,4 million google hits) vs MiG-29C (0,4 million google hits) so far and plus German, English and Russian wikpedia articles agree on that and they are not direct translations of each other. And also the russian "C" (Kyrillic) is pronounced like an english "S", so it makes sense. EDIT: http://migavia.ru/index.php/en/production/the-mig-29-fighters-family Even the official MiG page uses the "S" in the "SM" variants etc. Edited January 31, 2019 by Owl Dynamic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frostie Posted January 31, 2019 Share Posted January 31, 2019 The NATO Codename does not have to correspond to its actual name. Counter-example: MiG-29K (9-31) is Codenamed Fulcrum-D. Seriously, it is MiG-29S (Latin) unless somebody would kindly post a link to a credible, significant source which says otherwise. MiG-29S (1,4 million google hits) vs MiG-29C (0,4 million google hits) so far and plus German, English and Russian wikpedia articles agree on that and they are not direct translations of each other. And also the russian "C" (Kyrillic) is pronounced like an english "S", so it makes sense. I don't think you're understanding. The K in MiG29K (K = Korabelny, Ship-Borne) is Russian origin the same as the S in 29S. The C in MiG29C and A in MiG29A are of NATO origin, for example I doubt you'll find the MiG29 marked up as MiG29A in Russian documents. "[51☭] FROSTIE" #55 51st PVO "BISONS" Fastest MiG pilot in the world - TCR'10 https://100kiap.org Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owl Dynamic Posted February 1, 2019 Author Share Posted February 1, 2019 (edited) The C in MiG29C and A in MiG29A are of NATO origin, for example I doubt you'll find the MiG29 marked up as MiG29A in Russian documents. Here http://www.bredow-web.de/Berlin_Schoenefeld/MiG-29/mig-29.html it lists both MiG-29C (9.13, NATO) which has a more sturdy fuselage and additional fuel tanks and the MiG-29S (9.13S) which as an improved radar. And we have this latter variant as it says in the manual of the MiG-29 module. On p.49 it speaks about the new modern TWS2 radar mode for R-77 rockets and uses MiG-29S as a designation. So this functionality confirms what the website says. http://toad-design.com/migalley/index.php/jet-aircraft/mig29/mig29-variants/ Here it speaks of the MiG-29S variant as well. Both actually run under the Fulcrum C codename. Definitely a confusing scheme. EDIT: Check the game's internal reference book about the MiG-29S. At least in the russian version it says 9.13S variant. So I hope this finally puts a nail in the coffin for this debate that it should indeed be MiG-29S in the control tab of the settings. Edited February 1, 2019 by Owl Dynamic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AeriaGloria Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 I always heard the S is an upgrade that can be applied to 9.12 or 9.13, the example we have is 9.13S. So a 9.13doesmt necessarily have to be an S. My source is Paul Edens book from 2004. Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfa Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 МиГ-29 (9.12) = MiG-29 = "FULCRUM A" МиГ-29УБ (9.51) = MiG-29UB = "FULCRUM B" МиГ-29 (9.13) = MiG-29 = "FULCRUM C" МиГ-29С (9.13С) = MiG-29S = "FULCRUM C" There is no such thing as a "MiG-29C" or "MiG-29A" - these are erroneous designations....either simply a case of applying "Western" designation system(like F-16A and F-16C) to Russian aircraft, or mixing NATO reporting names with the original designation - i.e. MiG-29 + FUlCRUM A = MiG-29A. Note that: a) NATO makes no distinction between the MiG-29(9.13) and the MiG-29S(9.13S), but calls both "FULCRUM C". b) Russian/Soviet designation makes no distinction between different versions of the "baseline" MiG-29 - i.e. domestic 9.12, warsaw pact 9.12A, commercial 9.12B and even the 9.13 is still just called "MiG-29". JJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfa Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 I always heard the S is an upgrade that can be applied to 9.12 or 9.13, the example we have is 9.13S. So a 9.13doesmt necessarily have to be an S. My source is Paul Edens book from 2004. Thats correct :) JJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts