Jump to content

Su-24 Fencer B


Satarosa

Recommended Posts

The Sukhoi Su-24B (NATO reporting name: Fencer B) is a supersonic, al-weather attack aircraft developed in the Soviet Union. The aircraft has a variable-sweep wing, twin-engines and a side-by-side seating arrangement for its two crew.

 

 

sukhoi-su-24-205508.jpg

 

 

o9tqxnj.jpg

Real War, Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCs1uki5QsyuHUdvtmWJTOg?view_as=subscriber

 

Real War, Voice Chat: https://discord.gg/UGa3KMe

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would love to see it in game as playable, Can't believe that really nice chart has that ridiculous donald cook story on it.

 

Depends where it was made I guess. Some people believe that crap lol.

Proud owner of:

PointCTRL VR : Finger Trackers for VR -- Real Simulator : FSSB R3L Force Sensing Stick. -- Deltasim : Force Sensor WH Slew Upgrade -- Mach3Ti Ring : Real Flown Mach 3 SR-71 Titanium, made into an amazing ring.

 

My Fathers Aviation Memoirs: 50 Years of Flying Fun - From Hunter to Spitfire and back again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope to see this plane ingame one day as a playable. I guess we will have to wait a long time till they all get fased out by the Su-34

 

Not entirely. The Su-24M (Not M2) might be possible. Both as it is 80's era and an exported platform, contrasted to the M2 which is modernized and only used by Russia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not entirely. The Su-24M (Not M2) might be possible. Both as it is 80's era and an exported platform, contrasted to the M2 which is modernized and only used by Russia.

 

I doubt that - even the Mig-29A 9-12A isn't possible afaik even though it's the first export version and in service with several NATO countries.

 

Imho we should not expect to see anything in DCS that is in russian Service - different versions do not seem to matter. Therefore i think even the base version Su-24 is not possible at the Moment.

 

IIRC ED has stated somewhere - i think it was chizh in the russian forum - that specifically the Su-24 is not going to happen.

Main Module: AH-64D

Personal Wishlist: HH-60G, F-117A, B-52H

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 5 weeks later...
My kind of aircraft. Does this do anything that the Su-25T doesn't? In what situation would you use this instead of the Su-25T?

 

 

Both are attack aircraft, but the difference is the Su-25T is for good for anti tank, the Su-24 is high speed long range attack aircraft who can carry big bombs !

 

32cdea9c95b16d6768e20306db75714e.jpg

Real War, Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCs1uki5QsyuHUdvtmWJTOg?view_as=subscriber

 

Real War, Voice Chat: https://discord.gg/UGa3KMe

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Su-25T is not good for SEAD and never were even IRL. Too slow, poor range, extremely bad performance when heavy loaded. At the end was canceled. Su-34 was already on serial production and of course Su-24 will remain until Su-34 increase in quantity.

 

Su-24 can performance +1100kph low flight. Su-25T is not the right design for a tactical task. The original design (Su-25A) have better acceleration and better maneuverability in general. At the end of the day Su-25T was canceled and we only have it as a valuable free plus but at this point the Sim get unbalanced because you can’t compared Su-25T flight performance with F-18...

 

ED know very well this. Anyway...

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why the B variant?

 

Su-24B

 

He entered service on 1975 (only 6 Su-24B were manufactured) in the Su-24 version, designated Fencer by NATO. He then carried 7000 kg of offensive charges under 6 points of carriage. It was the first Soviet aircraft to have an integrated avionics, that is to say that few antennas exceed. He possessed a Puma navigation and fire control radar and a Relyef nose-tracking and obstacle avoidance system in the nose, an Orion-A Doppler pulse radar, an Orbita-10-58 computer and a Sirena radar warning detector. The ejector seats were Zvezda K-36D Zero-Zero type. It was built from 1971 to 1983. It can also carry 2 to 4 AA-8 missiles of self-defense.

It was produced in several Blocks, like American devices: Blocks 4, 8, 9, 12 and 14 represented the initial series, bringing each time a modification.

The Fencer-B (Block 15 and 21) was distinguished by the appearance of a tail parachute.

 

 

su24_schem_04.jpg?resize=630%2C394&ssl=1

 

 

The B version of the Su-24 is clearly obsolete and probably declassified, which leaves a real possibility of the realization for DCS WORLD !!

 

 

 

The Su-25T and the Ka-50 are much more modern for example than the Su-24B..


Edited by Satarosa

Real War, Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCs1uki5QsyuHUdvtmWJTOg?view_as=subscriber

 

Real War, Voice Chat: https://discord.gg/UGa3KMe

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe a 3rd party, but given the podcast and certain statements a Su24 wont be made by ED thats for sure

 

Build:

 

Windows 10 64 bit Pro

Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD,  WD 1TB HDD

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes!

 

Would love to see it in game as playable, Can't believe that really nice chart has that ridiculous donald cook story on it.

 

Knowing that ED can't go there, as long as their main studio is based in Russia, would be really nice if a skilled and knowledgeful 3rd party could deliver this one in full fidelity!

Intel i7-13700KF :: ROG STRIX Z790-A GAMING WIFI D4 :: Corsair Vengeance LPX 64GB ::  MSI RTX 4080  Gaming X Trio  :: VKB Gunfighter MK.III MCG Ultimate :: VPC MongoosT-50 CM3 :: non-VR :: single player :: open beta

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey

 

HB has plans to make a West carrier aircraft.

 

Hi Silver Dragon, the problems in DCS world we have 2 US aircrafts carrier, with one with awful textures!

 

Both are absolutely bug-filled; spawn bug collision parking location, disincronization bug with space time, bug of the economy, buggy planes that slide by themselves ..

 

I would have definitely preferred to have only one aircraft carrier for the US and Russia, but 100% operational with HD textures and crew annimation, and above all NO bug (the bug of the economy is the most terrible!)

 

I like your youtube chanel ;)

Real War, Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCs1uki5QsyuHUdvtmWJTOg?view_as=subscriber

 

Real War, Voice Chat: https://discord.gg/UGa3KMe

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Silver Dragon, the problems in DCS world we have 2 US aircrafts carrier, with one with awful textures!

 

Both are absolutely bug-filled; spawn bug collision parking location, disincronization bug with space time, bug of the economy, buggy planes that slide by themselves ..

 

I would have definitely preferred to have only one aircraft carrier for the US and Russia, but 100% operational with HD textures and crew annimation, and above all NO bug (the bug of the economy is the most terrible!)

 

I like your youtube chanel ;)

 

Thanks Satarosa ;)

Remember the "new" carrier incoming with living deck and other implements, Kutnesov coming later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need for ten aircraft carriers but one that works!!

 

Thanks Satarosa ;)

Remember the "new" carrier incoming with living deck and other implements, Kutnesov coming later.

 

No need for ten aircraft carriers but one that works!! :D

Real War, Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCs1uki5QsyuHUdvtmWJTOg?view_as=subscriber

 

Real War, Voice Chat: https://discord.gg/UGa3KMe

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...